Protection and Characteristics of Geographical Indications in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v2i2.1515Keywords:
Protection, Characteristics, Intellectual Property Rights, Geographical IndicationsAbstract
Geographical Indications are product identification associated with a specific geographic location. Indonesia has a Geographical Indication protection system to protect local products and promote unique products that can only be found in certain areas through Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The main characteristics of Geographical Indications in Indonesia include the relationship between the product and the geographical environment, the quality and reputation attached to the product, as well as the traditions and local wisdom associated with the product. The protection of Geographical Indications in Indonesia aims to ensure that only products that comply with the specified criteria may use the Geographical Indications mark. Characteristics of Geographical Indications include links with regions and traditions, as well as the reputation of products originating from the area. This protection helps promote and sustain local culture and economy. The research methodology used in this study uses a type of normative research with various approaches, which consist of statutory approach (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The sources of legal materials used in this study are in the form of primary law (primary source) and secondary law (secondary source) and non-legal material. The results of the research and the main findings are that the characteristics of geographical indications are different from other IPRsgeographic indication has unique characteristics caused by natural factors, thus giving effect to the goods or products produced by a certain region.
Downloads
References
Ayu, Miranda R. (2006). Memperbincangkan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Indikasi Geografis. Alumni.
Iswi Hariyani, Cita Yustisia Serfiyani, R. Serfiyanto D.P . (2020). Buku Pintar Haki Dan Warisan Budaya. Gadjah Mada University Press
Junus, W. (2007). Pentingnya Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Sebagai Bagian dari HKI dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual
Peter Mahmud Marzuki (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Ketiga). Kencana
Riswandi, Budi Agus, & Syamsudin (2004). M. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Budaya Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada
Rotstein, F. (2009). A Teaching Case for WIPO. Sidamo Melbourne Law School
Candra Irawan, (2017). Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Perspective on Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia. JWIP, 5(3), 12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12073
Marescotti, A. (2020). Are Protected Geographical Indications Evolving Due to Environmentally Related Justifications? An Analysis of Amendments in the Fruit and Vegetable Sector in the European Union. Sustainability Journal, 9(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093571
Hananto, Pulung W H. (2014). Geographical Indication as a Tool to Protect Indonesian Herritage: Lesson From Bali Kintamani Arabic Coffee Case. Journal Of Intellectual Property Law And Practice, 8(5), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpu149
Kishore, K. (2018). Geographical Indications in Horticulture: An Indian Perspective. International Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23(7), 159-166. https://doi.org/ 10.4172/2375-4516.1000162
Purwaningsih, E. (2014). ‘Disclosure of Origin pada Pengakuan dan Publikasi Tradisional Knowledge dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Qius Iustum, 21(2), 272. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss2.art6
Rustiala, Kal., & Munzer, Stephen R. (2007). The Global Struggle Over Geographical Indication. The European Journal of International Law, 18(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm016
Rohani, (2015). The Law Protection of Traditional Knowledge throught Sui Generis Law. Fiat Justisia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(1).428-449. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no4.609
Belleti, Giovani et. (2011). The Effect of Protecting Geographical Indicatios: Ways and Means of Their Evaluation. Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property. 7(2). 55-57. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1822153
Sudjana, (2018). Implications of Protecting Geographical Indications Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 on Local Economic Development. Veritas et Justitia, 4(3) 30. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2915
Syprianus Aristeus, (2014). Opportunities for Indonesian Industry and Trade in the Implementation of the ASEAN Economic Community. Rechts Vinding Journal: National Law Development Medi,. 3(5), 145. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i2.37
Tashiro, A.; Uchiyama, Y.; Kohsaka (2019). R ‘Impact of Geographical Indication Schemes on Traditional Knowledge in Changing Agricultural Landscapes: An Empirical Analysis From Japan. Journal Of Rural Studies, 68(10), 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.014
WIPO Secretariat for the Sixth Session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs, and Geographical Indications (SCT) (2002, March 20). Document SCT/6/3 Rev. on Geographical Indications: Historical Background, Nature of Rights, Existing Systems for Protection and Obtaining Protection in Other Countries. https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=2091
Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) of Indonesia (2021, February 2). Data E-Indikasi Geografis https://dgip.go.id
Article 22. Agreement On Trade-Related Aspects Of Intellectual Property Rights
Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nuzulia Kumala Sari, M. Khoidin, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, Djulaeka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
