From Indigenous to Improved Breeds: Adoption Dynamics and Intensity of Artificial Insemination Among Farmers in Western Kenya

Authors

  • G. O. Awuor Department of Agricultural Economics and Resource Management, Moi University, P.O Box 3900, Eldoret, 30100, Kenya https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3762-2480
  • E. Kipkemei Department of Agricultural Economics and Resource Management, Moi University, P.O Box 3900, Eldoret, 30100, Kenya
  • A. Serem Department of Agricultural Economics and Resource Management, Moi University, P.O Box 3900, Eldoret, 30100, Kenya
  • A. K. Kipkoech Department of Agricultural Economics and Resource Management, Moi University, P.O Box 3900, Eldoret, 30100, Kenya https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5604-6405

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajfst.v4i2.5280

Keywords:

Adoption Intensity, AI Technology, Probit, Western Kenya

Abstract

Adoption of Artificial Insemination (AI) has the potential to upgrade local dairy breeds for improved milk production in western Kenya. This study employed the double hurdle probit model to analyze factors influencing the adoption and intensity of AI technology. A multistage random sampling technique was employed to identify sample units among adopters and non-adopters of AI technology. Data was obtained from cross-sectional survey of 378 farmer households. Results of the probit model showed that age, education level, experience, milk sales, AI cost, worker’s skill on heat detection, semen type, AI reliability, and availability of the inseminator positively and significantly influenced AI technology adoption. Only training on livestock production negatively and significantly influenced AI technology adoption. Results of the truncated regression showed that age, education level, experience, and training on livestock production positively and significantly influenced the intensity of AI technology use. Group membership and the availability of the inseminator negatively and significantly influenced the intensity of AI technology adoption. It is concluded information is the most critical factor influencing adoption of AI. Building more trust and confidence about AI technologies will lead to increased adoption. The study recommends the improvement of farmer education through introduction of effective farmer training and information sessions. There is need to conduct training needs assessments before the trainings are carried out so as to capture the farmers’ interest together with their socio-economic environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abot, D. M. (2020). Factors Influencing Adoption of Artificial insemination by Smallholder Livestock Farmers in Dryland Production Systems of Kenya. Unpublished MSc. Thesis; University of Nairobi.

Abraha, B., Muluken, G. and Jemal, Y. (2020). Adoption of Artificial Insemination Service for Cattle Crossbreeding by Smallholder Farmers in Laelay-Maichew District. Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 12(2), 104 – 112. https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE2020.1183

Agricultural Sector Development Support Programme (ASDSP). (2014). Report on milk production rates in Kenya. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Kenya.

Ayantunde, A. A., Fernandez-Rivera, S., Hiernaux, P. H., & Tabo, R. (2008). Implications of restricted access to grazing by cattle in the wet season in the Sahel. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(5), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.06.006

Bayan, B. (2018). Factors Influencing Extent of Adoption of Artificial Insemination (AI) Technology among cattle farmers in Assam. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 14(3), 528 – 534. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2018.00166.X

Castellini, G., Raffaelli, S., Mancinelli, V., Boncinelli, F., Corsi, C., & Gallerani, G. (2025). Determinants of consumer and farmer acceptance of new production technologies: A systematic review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 1557974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1557974

Chen, L., Guan, X., Zhuo, J., Han, H., Gasper, M., Doan, B., Yang, J., & Ko, T.-H. (2020). Application of double hurdle model on effects of demographics for tea consumption in China. Journal of Food Quality, 2020, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9862390

Cragg, J. G. (1971). Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica, 39(5), 829–844. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909582

Directorate of Livestock Production and Veterinary, Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya. (2019). Climate report for Western Kenya livestock production. Government Printer.

Dumara, A., & Zenbaba, O. S. (2020). Factors affecting adoption and its intensity of malt barley technology package in Malga Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 6(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20160103.15

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2016). The global dairy sector: Facts. FAO.

Gahakwa, D., Asiimwe, T., Nabahungu, N. L., Mutimura, M., Isibo, T., Mutaganda, A., & Ngaboyisonga, C. (2014). A decade of agricultural research in Rwanda: Achievements and the way forward. In B. Vanlauwe et al. (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for agricultural intensification of the humid highland systems of Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 69–80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07662-1_6

Gebre, Y. H., Gebru, G. W., & Gebre, K. T. (2022). Adoption of artificial insemination technology and its intensity of use in Eastern Tigray National Regional State of Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security, 11(44). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00384-3

Henning, J. I. F., Mare, F. A., & Willemse, B. J. (2010). Profitability analysis of different reproduction methods with Dohne Merinos. Paper presented at the AEASA Conference 2010, Cape Town, South Africa.

Herana, T., & Kumari, S. (2017). Factors affecting small dairy farmers’ adoption and intensity of adoption of artificial insemination technology: A case study of Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 7(6), 335-346. https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/191667

Howley, P., O’Donoghue, C., & Heanue, K. (2012). Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A panel data analysis of the use of artificial insemination among dairy farmers in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(171). https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n6p171

Ingabire MC, Liu Y, Pesha JC, Hardi A (2018). Factors affecting adoption of artificial insemination technology by small dairy farmers in Rwanda. A case of Rwamagana district. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 9(12):46-53. https://doi.org/10.7176/JESD/9-12-06

Kaaya, H., Bashasha, B., & Mutetikka, D. (2005). Determinants of utilization of AI services among Ugandan dairy farmers. Department of Veterinary Services and Animal Industry. Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness. Faculty of Agriculture, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. pp. 34 - 43.

KALRO. (2024). Livestock. Retried from https://www.kalro.org/divisions/livestock/

Kimunya, E.G. (2014). Effects of Patterns of Adoption of Dairy Farming Technologies among Small-Scale Farmers. Nairobi, Kenya: University of Nairobi.

Kiplagat, M. D., Cheruiyot, R., Matura, F. K., Kimani, F., & Gitau, M. G. (2025). The status of dairy development in the highly dairy and potential dairy counties in Kenya. Journal of Agriculture Science & Technology, 24(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.4314/jagst.v24i1.7

KNBS. (2019). 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census, Volume II: Distribution of Population by Administrative Units. KNBS, Nairobi.

Livondo, J. L., Kipkoech, A., & Macharia, E. W. (2015). Factors affecting communication channels preference by farmers in adoption of agricultural technology for Striga control: A case of Bungoma County, Kenya. Journal of Current Research in Agricultural Science, 11(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAERD2015.0697

Mahama, A., Awuni, J. A., Mabe, F. N., & Azumah, S. B. (2020). Modelling adoption intensity of improved soybean production technologies in Ghana: A generalized Poisson approach. Heliyon, 6(7), e03543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03543

Mahoussi, F. E., Adegbola, P. Y., Aoudji, A. K. N., Kouton-Bognon, B., & Biaou, G. (2021). Modeling the adoption and use intensity of improved maize seeds in Benin, West Africa: A double-hurdle approach. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.99.20520

Mwanga, G., Mujibi, F. D. N., Yonah, Z. O., & Chagunda, M. G. G. (2019). Multi-country investigation of factors influencing breeding decisions by smallholder dairy farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Tropical animal health and production, 51(2), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1703-7

Odero-Waitituh, J. A. (2017). Dairy farming in Kenya: An analysis of resource allocation, productivity and profitability. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 9(7), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAERD2017.0869

Okello, D., Owuor, G., Larochelle, C., Gathungu, E., & Mshenga, P. (2021). Determinants of utilization of agricultural technologies among smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 6, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100213

Olutumise, A. I., Adene, I. C., Ajibefun, A. I., & Amos, T. T. (2020). Adoption of improved technologies and profitability of catfish processors in Ondo State, Nigeria: A Cragg’s double-hurdle model approach. Scientific African, 10, e00576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00576

Özsayın, D. (2020). Factors affecting the use of artificial insemination of farmers in dairy farming.International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 4(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.13

Pope, M., & Sonka, S. (2020). Quantifying the economic benefits of on-farm digital technologies. Farmdoc daily 10, 40. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2020/03/quantifying-the-economic-benefits-of-on-farm-digital-technologies.html

Sharma, P. R., Singh, M., Sinha, P. K., Mollier, R. T., & Rajkhowa, D. J. (2020). Factors for adoption of artificial insemination technology in pig: Evidence from small-scale pig production system. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52, 2755–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02391-7

Shehu, M. B., Kezi, M. D., & Bidoli, T. D. (2010). Challenges to farmers’ participation in artificial insemination (AI) biotechnology in Nigeria: An overview. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v14i2.64128

Tefera, S. S. (2013). Determinants of artificial insemination use by smallholder dairy farmers in Lemu-bilbilo District, Ethiopia. Unpublished MSc Thesis. Egerton University.

Temba, A. E. M. (2011). Factors Affecting Adoption of Artificial Insemination Technology by Dairy Farmers in Kinondoni District. MA Thesis; Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.

Wafula, B. N., Ngeno, V., Serem, A., & Kipkorir, P. (2021). Adoption and intensity of improved fish feeds use in Western Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 85(1–4), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.2021.1894567

Wanjala, S. P. O., & Njehia, K. B. (2014). Herd characteristics on smallholder dairy farms in Western Kenya. Journal of Animal Science Advances, 4(8), 996–1003. https://doi.org/10.5455/jasa.20140827111904

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Awuor, G. O., Saina, E., Serem, A., & Kipkoech, A. K. (2025). From Indigenous to Improved Breeds: Adoption Dynamics and Intensity of Artificial Insemination Among Farmers in Western Kenya. American Journal of Food Science and Technology, 4(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajfst.v4i2.5280