Science Teachers’ Academic Optimism and Stages of Concern on the Content Enrichment Program of DOST-SEI Project STAR

Authors

  • Love Joy M. Pascua Department of Science and Technology, Science Education Institute, Philippines
  • Cesario Y. Pacis Mariano Marcos State University, College of Industrial Technology, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i4.3244

Keywords:

Academic Optimism, Content Enrichment, Science Teachers, Stages of Concern

Abstract

This study aimed to explore Science teachers’ academic optimism, their stages of concern regarding the DOST-SEI Project STAR content enrichment program, and the relationship between these variables. The research utilized a descriptive design involving 353 public school Science teachers in the Philippines who attended the Project STAR Science Content Enrichment Webinar Series. Data were collected via a three-part survey distributed through Google Forms and analyzed using frequency and percentage distribution, weighted mean, and Pearson r correlation. Findings revealed that Science teachers exhibited high academic optimism across three dimensions: self-efficacy, trust in students and parents, and academic emphasis. Attendance in the content enrichment program significantly predicted teachers’ academic optimism as a collective construct. Nearly all measures of academic optimism were high, with one very high indicator showing that teachers are adept at fostering student learning values. They are committed to bridging the gap between essential knowledge and its relevance to students’ lives. Regarding the stages of concern, teachers showed high levels of implementing what they learned from the DOST-SEI Project STAR Content Enrichment Program, indicating practical application. This suggests that teachers are beginning to collaborate, coordinate implementation, and evaluate achievements collectively, learning from each other. Moreover, results indicated a significant positive correlation at the 0.01 level between teachers’ academic optimism (self-efficacy, trust in students and parents, academic emphasis) and their stages of concern (self, task, impact). This underscores the interconnectedness between teachers’ confidence, their collaborative efforts, and their focus on improving educational outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhendal, D., Alshatti, S. A., & Alnwaiem, A. (2017). Teacher academic optimism and effective teaching-learning environment at Kuwaiti primary schools. Educational Science Journal.

Alshammari, B. S. (2000). The developmental stages of concern of teachers toward the implementation of the information technology curriculum in Kuwait.

Babu, S., & Mendro, R. (2003). Teacher accountability: HLM-based teacher effectiveness indices in the investigation of teacher effects on student achievement in a state assessment program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL, April.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman and Company.

Beard, K. S., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers: Confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1136–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.003

Bevel, R. K. (2010). The effects of academic optimism on students’ academic achievement in Alabama.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Delgado, P. (2019). The importance of parental involvement in teaching. Observatory. https://observatory.tec.mx/edu-news/the-importance-of-parental-involvement-in-teaching/

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide science (Grade 3 to Grade 10). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Science-CG_with-tagged-sci-equipment_revised.pdf

Department of Education. (2020). Guidelines on the use of the most essential learning competencies (MELCs). https://commons.deped.gov.ph/MELCS-Guidelines.pdf

Department of Science and Technology – Science Education Institute. (2020). STAR Manual.

Department of Science and Technology – Science Education Institute. (2021). Annual report.

Donovan, S. R. (2014). Learning from academically optimistic teachers: Supporting academic optimism.

Fahy, P., Wu, H., & Hoy, W. K. (2010). Individual academic optimism of secondary teachers: A new concept and its measure. In W. K. Hoy & M. DiPaola (Eds.), Analyzing school contexts: Influences of principals and teachers in the service of students (pp. 209–227). Information Age.

Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can’t improve without it. Teachers College, Columbia University.

Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00028312006002207

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 479–508.

Higher Education and Southeast Asia and Beyond. (2020). How is COVID-19 impacting higher education? Head Foundation Org. https://headfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/HESB-8-COVID19_2020.pdf

Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446.

Johnson, D. (2020). Upskilling and reskilling for the ‘new normal’ of education. Edelements. https://www.edelements.com/blog/upskilling-and-reskilling-for-the-new-normal-of-education

Meier, K. (2018). Role of teachers in the curriculum process. Chron. https://work.chron.com/role-teachers-curriculum-process-5344.html

Mitchell, R. M., Mendiola, B., Schumacker, R., & Lowery, X. (2016a). Creating a school context of success: The role of enabling school structure and academic optimism in an urban elementary and middle school setting. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2015-0018

Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Sandilos, L. (2014). Improving students’ relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/education-career/k12/relationships

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 211–247.

Teacher Certification Degrees. (2023). Science teacher career guide. https://www.teachercertificationdegrees.com/careers/science-teacher/

Wagner, C. A., & DiPaola, M. F. (2011). Academic optimism of high school teachers: Its relationship to organizational citizenship behaviors and student achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 21(6), 893–926.

William and Mary School of Education. (2023). The importance of curriculum development in enhancing teaching and learning. William and Mary. https://counseling.education.wm.edu/blog/the-importance-of-curriculum-development-in-enhancing-teaching-and-learning.org

Downloads

Published

2024-09-25

How to Cite

Pascua, L. J. M., & Pacis, C. Y. (2024). Science Teachers’ Academic Optimism and Stages of Concern on the Content Enrichment Program of DOST-SEI Project STAR. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(4), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i4.3244