Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Their Performance Appraisal in Public Secondary Schools

Authors

  • J.A. Mungasia Department of Educational Psychology, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya
  • J.B. Ouda Department of Educational Psychology, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya
  • K. Otieno Department of Educational Psychology, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.530

Keywords:

Performance Appraisal, Self-Efficacy, Secondary Schools, Kenya

Abstract

This paper aimed to assess the effect of teachers’ self-efficacy on their performance appraisal in public secondary schools in Sabatia Sub County, Vihiga County, Kenya. The study, anchored on the social cognitive theory, adopted correlational and descriptive survey research designs. Stratified random sampling was used to select 12 schools and 227 teachers for the study based on category of school, status, and gender. Principals of each sampled school and the Sabatia Sub-County Teachers’ Service Commission director were purposively sampled. Data for the study was collected using questionnaires, interview guide, and document analysis guide. Quality assurance of research instruments ensured through piloting, content validity and test retest for reliability. Quantitative data was analysed using SPSS (version 25.0) descriptively and inferentially, while qualitative data was analyzed thematically. The findings showed the R-value from the model summary of the regression between self-efficacy and performance appraisal was 0.617. The R square value was 0.381, which implied 38.1 % effect on self-efficacy was attributed to teacher appraisal. The findings show significant effect of self-efficacy on performance appraisal. Therefore, performance appraisal for teachers needs to be enhanced since it plays a significant role in boosting their confidence, thus their self-efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aurah, C. and McConnell, T. (2014). Comparative study o Pre-Service teaching: self-efficacy beliefs of Teaching in Kenya and United States of America,USA. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 233-239.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Cresswell, J. W. & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2014). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: sage publications Ltd.

Danielson, C (2001). New trends in teacher evaluation. Education leadership 58(5), 12-15.

Danielson, C and McGreal, T. (2001). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria. VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development.

Darling-Hammand et al. (2013). Evaluating teacher evaluation. Colleagues 10(2) article 8.

Gall, M.D, Gall, J.P, & Borg,W. R. ( 2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th Edition) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Gerald, L. F, Varma, K., Corliss, S.B. & Linn, M. C. (2011). Professional Development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research, 81(3) 408-448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311415121

Dugatkin, L. A “Behavior” http://Psychologytoday.com. Goddard, I. & Emerson, C. (2006). Appraisal and your School. Oxford: Heinemann.

Elliot, K. (2015). “Teacher performance or development?” Australian journal of Teacher Education, 40(19) http://dx.doi.org/10.14.

Goddard, I. & Emerson, C. (2006). Appraisal and your School. Oxford: Heinemann.

Hilterington, E, M and Park R. O. (1999). Child Psychology: A contemporary viewpoint (5th Edition) McGrow-hill college.

Jarvinen, P. (2004). On research methods. Opinpajan kirja,Tampere, Finland.

Kadenyi. (2014). Influence of Teacher Appraisal on Improvement of Students Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools In Vihiga Sub-County, Kenya( A Master’s Thesis to University of Nairobi).

Kothari, C. A. (2004). Research methodology: methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.

Kumar, C. R. (2008). Research methodology. New Delhi:APH.

Mugenda, O. M and Mugenda, A. G. (2001). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi. Acts press

OECD (2013). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris.OECD.

Okumbe, J. A. (1999). Education management: Theory and Practice. Nairobi. Nairobi University Press

Overbaugh, R. & Lu, R. (2008). The impact of a NCLB-EETT funded professional development program on teacher self-efficacy and resultant implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 41(1) 43-61. http://dx.doi.10.1080/15391623.2008.10782522

Pajares, P. (1997). Current directions in Self-efficacy research: in M. Maer & P. R. Pintrich( eds). Advances in motivation and achievement Volume 10 (pp1-49), Greenwich. C. T. JAI. press.

Ross, J. & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of randomized field trial. Journal of Education Research. 101(1) 50-60. http://dx.doi./103200/JOER.101.1.50-60

Sharma, G & Sanger, M. (2015). “A Study of Time Management In Relation To Stress and Self Efficacy Among Married Working and Non-working Women” Journal for Studies in management and Planning, 1

Myers, D. G. (1995). Psychology, (4th edition). Worth publishers.

Wasserman. E. & Maymon, Z. (2017). The correlation between professional development and teacher’s self-efficacy. International Education Research, 5(1), 1-12 http://dx.org/10.12735/iersnlpl

Downloads

Published

2022-09-24

How to Cite

Mungasia, J. A., Ouda, J. B., & Otieno, K. (2022). Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Their Performance Appraisal in Public Secondary Schools. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.530