The Days of Repentance with the True Promise Ideological and Theological Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v5i3.6104Keywords:
Analysis, Discourse, Ideology, Language, News, TheologyAbstract
Israel’s aggressive attitude and behavior, which has lasted almost a century since its establishment in 1948 and before, has spread to almost the entire Middle East region. The process that started with the October 7 Hamas operation, which is the big excuse behind it, now constitutes the perfect version of Israel’s aggressive attitude. The news discourse of this aggressive attitude of Israel, which covers the entire Middle East region (in the context of the social media Instagram page), a cold war tension with Iran, although there are sometimes hot conflicts between them, and the news discourse of the two states are discussed comparatively. In the one-month period of this ongoing process, the ideological and theological dimension of the war is tried to be clarified on the discourse of these two enemy states. This study first begins with the definition of language, which is the means of expression of discourse. Then, what discourse is, which has a cause-and-effect relationship with language, is mentioned. It is clarified how the relationship between news and discourse is and how the ideological/theological discourse in the news discourse occurs. With what discourse these states convey the ideological/theological discourse of a one-month period during the war on the Instagram platform, at macro and micro levels within the framework of Van Dijk’s discourse analysis. is under review
Downloads
References
Aslan, K. (2004). Haber nasıl okunur? [How to read the news?]. Anahtar Kitaplar.
Çulhanoğlu, M. (2009). Nefret söylemi el kitabı [Hate speech handbook]. Council of Europe.
Devran, Y. (2010). Haber, söylem, ideoloji [News, discourse, ideology]. Referans Kitaplar.
Dursun, Ç. (2004). Haber, hakikat ve iktidar ilişkisi [The relationship between news, truth, and power]. Elips Kitap.
Elliott, R. (1996). Discourse analysis: Exploring action, function, and conflict in social texts. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(6), 65–68.
IRNA Turkish. (n.d.). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/irna_turkish/
Parker, I. (2002). Discourse analysis. In P. Banister, E. Burman, I. Parker, M. Taylor, & C. Tindall (Eds.), Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide (pp. 92–108). Open University Press.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.
Potter, W. J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in general linguistics. McGraw-Hill.
The Jerusalem Post. (n.d.). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/thejerusalem_post/
Tonkiss, K. (2006). Analysis of text and speech: Content and discourse analysis. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (2nd ed., pp. 367–383). Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & E. H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Blackwell.
Vardar, B. (2002). Açıklamalı dilbilim terimleri sözlüğü [Annotated dictionary of linguistic terms]. Multilingual.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2002). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zeynep Kılıç

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




