The Effect of Open Letters on the Perceptions of Electoral Accountability and National Sovereignty - A Study of Adichie’s & Oke’s Post-Election Letters to the American Governments

Authors

  • Essien Oku Essien Department of Communication, Culture and Media Studies, Drexel University, Chestnut Street, Pennsylvania, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2149-4527
  • Oluwaferanmi Dahunsi Department of Mass Communication, Bowen University, PMB 284 Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria
  • Peace Chinenye Nwachukwu Department of Mass Communication, National Open University of Nigeria, Ahmadu Bello Way, Victoria Island Lagos, Nigeria
  • Tosin Aribisala Department of News, Parallel Facts, Oso Street, Opebi, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v2i4.1783

Keywords:

Nigerian Election, Dissatisfaction, Perceptions, American governments, Letters

Abstract

Reactions in Nigeria to Adichie’s letter to the US President after the election were mixed, particularly leading to a reactive letter from Oke to the US President and Canadian Prime Minister. The complexity and diversity of Nigerian politics, as well as the challenges of striking a healthy balance between the demands for openness and accountability and the worries about national sovereignty and outside interference, is illuminated by an in-depth analysis of the perspectives and perceptions held by Nigerians with regard to the 2023 presidential elections outcome that prompted the letters. Hence, the study on reconciling the conflicting perceptions of electoral accountability versus national sovereignty in Adichie’s and Oke’s post-election letters to the American governments aims to present a variety of Nigerians’ perspectives in regards to the outcome of the presidential election, to consider the alleged electoral malpractices in the Election and how these prompted the letters to the American governments and to reconcile the conflicting perspectives of openness/accountability (Adichie’s Letter) and national sovereignty/interference (Oke’s Letter). The study is built on the frame of the agenda-setting theory. The paradigmatic analysis method is employed and the study’s discourse is further divided into four paradigms. The study concludes that all matters must be handled on the basis of deliberate patriotism and without any sentiment of ethnic biases as was perceived by Nigerians in order to resolve the tension between Adichie and Oke’s letters, which present opposing views on the importance of openness and accountability and the value of independence and national sovereignty, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Essien Oku Essien, Department of Communication, Culture and Media Studies, Drexel University, Chestnut Street, Pennsylvania, USA

Essien Essien is a doctoral student in the Department of Communication, Culture and Media Studies in the College of Arts and Science, Drexel University, Pennslyvania, USA where he focuses on research in political conflict/Crisis and Policy Communication. He is a First Class Communication graduate from the Cross River University of Technology, Nigeria where he emerged as the 2021 Best Graduated communication student. He is a member of the Common Grounds Research Network, a research body based in the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA.

References

Akhaine, S. O. (2011). Nigeria’s 2011 elections: The ‘crippled giant’learns to walk? African affairs, 110(441), 649-655.

Alghamdi, S. (2015). Analysing paradigmatic influences in a particular research. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(8), 78-83.

Aluaigba, M. T. (2016). Democracy deferred: The effects of electoral malpractice on Nigeria’s path to democratic consolidation. Journal of African Elections, 15(2), 136-158.

Arogbofa, J. (2022). Understanding the Leadership Crisis in Africa Using the Case of Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).

Baccini, L., Brodeur, A., & Weymouth, S. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of population economics, 34, 739-767.

Cancela, J., & Geys, B. (2016). Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections. Electoral studies, 42, 264-275.

Catoto, J. (2022). Metaphors in Political Speeches: Understanding President Duterte’s Discourse. American Journal of Arts and Human Sciences 1 (2), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v1i2.313https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajahs

Davis, G. F. (2021). Corporate purpose needs democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 902-913.

Egharevba, E. M., & Chiazor, A. I. (2012). Political corruption and national development in Nigeria. In international conference on Democracy, Governance and Curbing corruption in sub-Saharan Africa, Cheyney University of Pennsylvania, USA, 8, (10).

Epstein, S. B., & Kronstadt, K. A. (2013). Pakistan: US foreign assistance. Library of congress Washington DC.

Halliday, F. (2012). Political Journeys: The Open Democracy Essays. Yale University Press.

Idowu, H. A., & Mimiko, N. O. (2020). Enabling factors for peaceful political power alternation and democratic consolidation in Ghana and Nigeria. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 16(1), 161-195.

Ifeoma, C. O. (2008). The impact of foreign aid on the sovereignty of states: A case study of Kenya (1980-2005) (Doctoral dissertation).

Igbokwe-Ibeto, J. C., Osakede, O. K., Nkomah, B. B., & Kinge, F. R. (2016). Election and democratic consolidation in Nigeria: an analysis of the 2015 general elections. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter), 5(10), 1.

Jashari, M., & Pepaj, I. (2018). The role of the principle of transparency and accountability in Public Administration. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio, 10(1).

Khaldi, K. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative or mixed research: which research paradigm to use?. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), 15.

Khosrowjerdi, M. (2022, February). Good governance and national information transparency: A comparative study of 117 countries. In Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future: 17th International Conference, iConference 2022, Virtual Event, February 28–March 4, 2022, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 143-160). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Landemore, H. (2020). Open democracy: Reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.

Leese, M. (2017). Holding the project accountable: Research governance, ethics, and democracy. Science and engineering ethics, 23(6), 1597-1616.

Lewis, P. M. (2011). Nigeria votes: More openness, more conflict. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 60-74.

Mahakwe, A. S. (2022). The Roles of some selected Institutions in democratic Consolidation in Nigeria, 1999-2021. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 11, 68-81.

McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2014). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass communication and society, 17(6), 781-802.

Milward, A. (2017). The frontier of national sovereignty: history and theory 1945-1992. Routledge.

Napieralski, B. (2017). Political Catholicism and Euroscepticism: The deviant case of Poland in comparative perspective. Routledge.

NDI-IRI, (2023). NDI-IRI Joint International Election Observation Mission Releases Final Report on 2023 Nigerian General Elections. Retrieved from https://www.iri.org/news/ndi-iri-joint-international-election-observation-mission-releases-final-report-on-2023-nigerian-general-elections/

Nwaokolo, S. (2023). Indigenous Lagosians hail Tinubu over victory as President-elect. Nigerian Tribune. Retrieved from https://tribuneonlineng.com/indigenous-lagosians-hail-tinubu-over-victory-as-president-elect/#:~:text=A%20community%2Dbased%20organisation%20of,inclusive%2Dteam%2Dof%2Dtechnocrats

Obiagu, A., & Ajaps, S. (2022). Civic engagement in Nigeria: A new sociopolitical development perspective. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 9(1), 128-147.

Odunsi, W. (2023). Full Text of Peter Obi’s Speech Rejecting Presidential Election Result. Daily Post. Retrieved from https://dailypost.ng/2023/03/02/full-text-of-peter-obis-speech-rejecting-presidential-election-result/

Ogunnoiki, A. O. (2018). Political parties, ideology and the Nigerian State. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 4(12), 114-150.

Oostveen, A. M. (2010). Outsourcing democracy: losing control of e‐Voting in the Netherlands. Policy & internet, 2(4), 201-220.

Orjinmo, N. (2023). Nigeria elections 2023: Why young people are excited. BBC News online. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-64719408.amp

Premium Times (2023). Atiku rejects outcome of 2023 presidential election. Premium Times. Retrieved from https://www.premiumtimesng.com/features-and-interviews/585825-atiku-rejects-outcome-of-2023-presidential-election-full-speech.html#:~:text=Having%20consulted%20with%20leaders%20of,as%20such%20must%20be%20challenged.

Price, N. (2023). 2023 Presidential Election Results in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/2023-presidential-election-results-in-nigeria/

Standing, G. (2012). The precariat: why it needs deliberative democracy. Open Democracy.

Taufiq, I. (2015). Transparency and accountability in the qur’an and its role in building good governance. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 6(4), 73-81.

Ukpong, U. M., Uduak, A., Ekere, S. A., & Akpan, E. O. (2022). Government Expenditure and Agricultural Sector Output in Nigeria. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 1(4), 20-26.

Vanguard Online (2023). Full text: Chimammanda’s letter to Biden on Nigeria’s Hollow Democracy. Vanguard Online. Retrieved from https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/04/full-text-chimamandas-letter-to-biden-on-nigerias-hollow-democracy/amp/

Williams, T. T. (2010). The open space of democracy. Wipf and Stock Publishers.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-22

How to Cite

Essien, E. O., Dahunsi, O., Nwachukwu, P. C., & Aribisala, T. (2023). The Effect of Open Letters on the Perceptions of Electoral Accountability and National Sovereignty - A Study of Adichie’s & Oke’s Post-Election Letters to the American Governments. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 2(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v2i4.1783