In the Shade of the Tree: Understanding Wildlife Conservationists’ ExperiencesThrough a Phenomenological Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v4i1.7144Keywords:
Coping Strategies Wildlife Environmental Sustainability, Lived Experiences, Wildlife Conservation SDG No. 8: Decent work and economic growth, SDG No. 11: Sustainable cities and communities, SDG No. 15: life on land, SDG No. 14: life below waterAbstract
Wildlife conservationists dedicate their efforts to preserving and protecting local wildlife. The primary purpose of this study is to explore the lived experiences of Davao City’s wildlife conservationists, including both the rewarding and challenging aspects of their work, as well as the coping strategies they employ. The researchers adopted a qualitative research design, specifically a phenomenological approach. A semi-structured questionnaire served as the main research instrument. Eight wildlife conservationists from Davao City, representing various organizations, were interviewed about their experiences, challenges, and coping mechanisms.The results revealed that conservationists are driven by a genuine love for wildlife and by memorable encounters with animals. However, they also face difficult realities, such as emotionally and physically demanding fieldwork, job insecurity, financial instability, and the stress associated with animal care. To cope, many find comfort in wildlife itself—interacting with animals and spending time in nature helps them relax and feel grounded. Support from family, friends, and colleagues also plays a key role in managing emotional stress. Additionally, they rely on effective time management, strategic work planning, and lessons gained through mentorship and experience. Based on their insights, the study underscores the value of ongoing training and seminars for raising awareness and highlights the importance of holistic, community-based conservation efforts. Strengthening partnerships with government agencies and reinforcing conservation policies are seen as essential steps toward helping conservationists perform their roles more effectively and maintain their well-being. Despite the challenges, these conservationists remain deeply committed to their mission, demonstrating that passion remains a powerful driving force in the field of wildlife protection.
References
Adeoye-Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441
Bennett, N. J., & Satterfield, T. (2018). Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.008
Boon, P. I. (2023). Is poor mental health an unrecognized occupational health and safety hazard for conservation biologists and ecologists? Pacific Conservation Biology, 29(4), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC21059
Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2019). Towards convivial conservation. Conservation & Society, 17(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_19_75
Chenery, S. (2025, January 5). “I sort of fell apart”: Black summer bushfires’ toll on the vets and carers helping Australian wildlife. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jan/05/australia-black-summer-bushfires-vets-wildlife
Church, A., Fish, R., Haines-Young, R., Mourato, S., Tratalos, J., Stapleton, L. M., Willis, C., & Coates, P. (2014). UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 5: Cultural ecosystem services and indicators. UNEP-WCMC, LWEC. https://surli.cc/xbkxim
Cranston, K. A., & Khalil, K. (2022). Conservation psychology: The future of conservation built upon a legacy. Zoo Biology, 41(5), 377–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21531
Creswell, J. W. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book266033
Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Western, D., Galvin, K. A., McElwee, P., & Cabeza, M. (2020). Historical shifts in local attitudes towards wildlife by Maasai pastoralists of the Amboseli Ecosystem (Kenya): Insights from three conservation psychology theories. Journal for Nature Conservation, 53, 125763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125763
Gierczyk, M., Gromkowska-Melosik, A., & Scott, J. (2023). The snowball sampling strategy in the field of social sciences: Contexts and considerations. Polish Sociological Review. https://doi.org/ (or URL if DOI not available)
Jones, P., & Smith, R. (2022). The impact of nature exposure on cognitive function and emotional well-being. Ecopsychology Journal, 12(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2022.0045
National Geographic Society. (n.d.). Conservation stories: The experiences that inspired young explorers. National Geographic Society. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/conservation-stories-experiences-inspired-young-explorers/
Pienkowski, T., Dickens, C., & Entwistle, A. (2023). Supporting conservationists’ mental health through better working conditions. Conservation Biology, 37(1), e14097. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14097
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jackson A. Sison, Edel John Siva, Kaye Ann C. Penazo, Veronica Elizabeth T. Tataes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.