Academic Satisfaction: A Comparative Analysis Between Blended Schedule and Everyday Classroom Instruction Among College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v3i1.4097Keywords:
Academic Satisfaction, Blended Learning, Traditional InstructionAbstract
The face of education has been changing over the past couple of decades-from new teaching methodologies to a greater emphasis on student-centered learning. Indeed, research has documented that academic satisfaction is a leading contributor to students’ successful and healthy experiences throughout college. Furthermore, this growth in technology has given way to the emergence of blended learning, which merges traditional classroom instruction with online resources and digital tools. However, the relative effect of blended learning in comparison to a traditional classroom setting regarding academic satisfaction remains inadequately explored. This study addresses this gap by comparing the level of academic satisfaction of students involved in blended learning programs (MSA 1 and MSA 2) against those in traditional classroom instructions at the University of Mindanao Digos College. Quantitative data with a descriptive-comparative design were obtained from 350 university students via a standardized questionnaire adapted from the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ. Results showed that students in blended learning environments were more academically satisfied (MSA 1: X=3.98 and SD=.000; MSA 2: X=3.85 and SD=.268) compared to students in traditional classrooms (Everyday Classroom Instruction: X=3.66 and SD=.308). However, the statistical analysis showed no significant differences in satisfaction between the blended and traditional instructional methods, meaning that both approaches can effectively support student engagement and satisfaction. In conclusion, this research provides a valuable insight for investigating the relationship between instructional methods and academic satisfaction. It underscores the importance of adopting blended learning strategies to foster higher levels of student satisfaction, with encouragement of further exploration in how best to optimize teaching approaches for improved educational outcomes within diverse
References
Ali, R. (2019). Is blending the solution? A systematic literature review on the key drivers of blended learning in higher education. MNJR, 7(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.62338/6atv9m37
Awamleh, A. (2019). Students’ satisfaction with blended learning programmes in the faculty of physical education. Science for Education Today, 9(5), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1905.03
Boriçi, A. (2024). An empirical study of potential factors impacting student satisfaction: A study focused on students living in the north of Albania and attending public universities (Case: University of Shkodra, University of Tirana, and the University of Medicine, Tirana). International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(5), e04690. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i5.4690
Durán-Guerrero, J., Ulloa-Guerrero, L., & Salazar-Díaz, L. (2019). Blended learning: An effective methodology for teaching radiology to medical students. Revista De La Facultad De Medicina, 67(2), 273-277. https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v67n2.69862
Fauzan, A., Rispawati, R., & Sumardi, L. (2023). Blended learning models using Moodle SPADA UNRAM to enhance student critical thinking in the PPKN study program FKIP University of Mataram. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(1b), 482-491. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i1b.1229
Gaber, A., El-Moneiem, E., & Eldesokey, A. (2022). The effect of blended learning of the maternity course on academic students’ achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Health Sciences. https://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijhs/article/download/10603/6490
Gómez-Baya, D., García-Moro, F. J., Muñoz-Silva, A., & Martín-Romero, N. (2021). School satisfaction and happiness in 10-year-old children from seven European countries. Children, 8(5), 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8050370
Haris, S. (2024). Comparison of satisfaction of students in public and private sector colleges of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. JHRR, 4(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.341
Hoffman, J., Eden, K., & others. (2022). Impacting student satisfaction, engagement, and motivation in online and traditional classrooms. KOME Journal. https://komejournal.com/files/KOME_OF_JenEdenetal.pdf
Li, L. (2022). Students’ academic achievement and satisfaction in a blended learning community of College English in China: A quasi-experimental study. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119485
Li, T., Guo, T., & Qi, Z. (2023). The impact of school service quality on student learning satisfaction: A comparative study of public and private high schools in China. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372332986
Malik, A., Iqbal, M., & Sultan, A. (2023). Impact of academic satisfaction on university students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(3), 806–812. https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.2023.4341
Mirabolghasemi, M., Shasti, R., & Choshaly, S. (2021). An investigation into the determinants of blended learning satisfaction from EFL learners’ perspective. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-07-2020-0117
Noh, G., & Kim, D. (2019). Effectiveness of a self-directed learning program using blended coaching among nursing students in clinical practice: A quasi-experimental research design. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1672-1
Nunez, J. L., Barnachea, A. L., Gula, L. P., Jabagat, J. B., & Urbano, J. M. (n.d.). Filipino students’ standpoint on going back to traditional schooling in the new normal. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED622770
Putri, T., Mariani, N., & Muin, F. (2021). EFL students’ perceptions of social presence and satisfaction in online learning. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355697078
Riatun, R., & Lestari, E. (2022). Analysis of the effect of information quality, system quality, and support service quality on user satisfaction levels and its implications for blended e-learning continuance intention to use in the new normal era. Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research, 1(7), 1067-1082. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjsr.v1i7.2226
Shashidhar, V., Rao, Y., Haleagrahara, N., Woolley, T., Alele, F., & Malau‐Aduli, B. (2019). Factors influencing medical students’ experiences and satisfaction with blended integrated e-learning. Medical Principles and Practice, 29(4), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505210
Taliaferro, S. L., & Harger, B. L. (2021). Comparison of student satisfaction, perceived learning, and outcome performance. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 36(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-19-33
Vernadakis, N., Tsitskari, E., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). A comparison of student satisfaction between traditional and blended technology course offerings in physical education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234082597_A_COMPARISON_of_student_satisfaction_between_traditional_and_blended_technology_course_offerings_in_physical_education
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chinky Ainne Marie F. Hilot, Jamela-Kim B. Paderog, Ashlie Faith E. Gaduyon, Jaeve P. Jumao-As, Loriene Michaella V. Lagrada, Chiela Mae A. Lamoste, Marian Joy Q. Batiancila

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.