The Responsiveness of Scales to Scientific Research Methodologies in University Theses

Authors

  • Firas Adredah Mansoor Imamaladham University College, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i1.2348

Keywords:

Standards, Scientific Research Methods, Standards

Abstract

The research aims to define scales and their criteria and measure the extent of research methodologies’ responsiveness to these scales by utilizing a sample comprising 50 university theses and dissertations in the field of information and knowledge technology from 2015 to 2023. A standardized measurement system was constructed to assess the level of research methodologies’ alignment with the established criteria utilized in scientific research. The research adopted a descriptive-analytical approach as the execution method, employing direct examination and reference listing as data collection tools. Data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel, and graphical curves were plotted. The results demonstrated the existence of 14 criteria associated with scales that enhance the effectiveness and responsiveness of research methodologies in scientific investigations. The responsiveness levels of research methodologies to the utilized criteria exhibited variation, ranging between 30% and 80%, contingent upon the research domain. The study revealed that the effectiveness ratio of criteria performance in hypothesis achievement within the study domain reached 51%, while the ratio of non-achievement of criteria performance stood at 49%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed Anwar Badr, and others. (2013). Research methods in information science and libraries in the twenty-first century. Cairo: Academic Library

Ali Salim Al-Alawneh. (1996). Practical research methods in administrative sciences. Amman: Dar Al-Fikr Publishing.

Ali, Z., & Bhaskar, S. B. (2016). Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. Indian journal of anaesthesia, 60(9), 662.

Amer Qandilji, and Iman Al-Samarrai. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative scientific research. Amman: Dar Al-Yazouri.

Alsomaidaee, M., Al Janabi, A. A. M., & Neamah, R. (2023). The Impact of Brand Capital on the Stock Price Crash Risk, an Empirical Study. American Journal of Environmental Economics, 2(1), 29-36.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Ertl, B., Hartmann, F. G., & Heine, J. H. (2020). Analyzing large-scale studies: Benefits and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 577410.

Faraj, Al-M.. (2016). Modern educational assessment and measurement. Amman: Dar Hamithra for Publishing and Translation.

Fitzner, K. (2007). Reliability and validity a quick review. The Diabetes Educator, 33(5), 775-780.

Fok, C. C. T., & Henry, D. (2015). Increasing the sensitivity of measures to change. Prevention Science, 16, 978-986.

Hauser, J., & Katz, G. (1998). Metrics: you are what you measure!. European Management Journal, 16(5), 517-528.

Kyriazos, T. A., & Stalikas, A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: The steps of scale development and standardization process. Psychology, 9(11), 2531-2560.

Mahmoud Ahmed Abu Samra, and Muhammad Abdul-Ilah Al-Titi. (2019). Scientific research methods from clarification to empowerment. Amman: Dar Al-Yazouri.

Medhat Abu Al-Nasr. (2004). Rules and stages of scientific research. Cairo: Nile Arab Group.

Musleh Ahmed Abu Shaqif. (2015). Encyclopedia of standards in social, educational, psychological and administrative sciences. Dar Al-Manhal: Amman

Muslim Abdullah Hassan. (2015). Total quality management: ISO standards. Amman: Dar Al-Mu’tazz.

Onyemaechi, U., Chinyere, U. P., & Emmanuel, U. (2018). Impact of telecommuting on employees’ performance. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 54-54.

Raja Mahmoud Abu Allam. (2014). Research methods in psychological and educational sciences. Cairo: Universities Publishing House.

Robinson, M. A. (2018). Using multi‐item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management. Human resource management, 57(3), 739-750.

Sawsan Shaker Majeed. (2013). Foundations for constructing psychological and educational tests and standards. Amman: Dar Al-Manhal.

Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., & Rout, T. (2018). Benefits and relevance of International Standards in a design science research project for process assessments. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 60, 48-56.

Spencer, D. S. (1986). The Master’s Degree in Transition. CGS Communicator, 19(1), n1.

Wollack, J. A., Cohen, A. S., & Wells, C. S. (2003). A method for maintaining scale stability in the presence of test speededness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40(4), 307-330.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-22

How to Cite

Mansour, F. A. (2024). The Responsiveness of Scales to Scientific Research Methodologies in University Theses. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i1.2348