Language as Economic Power: A Review of its Role in Global Business, International Relations and Public Policy

Authors

  • Tiyamike Mazaza-Jere Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow 117198, Russian Federation, Russia
  • Confidence Ododa Faculty of Social Sciences, Higher school of Economics, Myasnitskaya Street, 9/11, Room 529, Moscow, 101000, Russia
  • Ogbe George Junior Faculty of Social Sciences, Higher school of Economics, Myasnitskaya Street, 9/11, Room 529, Moscow, 101000, Russia
  • Yasir Abubakar Yusuf Academy of Engineering, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow 117198, Russian Federation, Russia
  • Othuke Godstime Arobaga Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Ambrose Alli University Ekpoma, Ekpoma, along the Benin-Auchi Road (Km 70), Edo State, Nigeria
  • Vincent Lucky Uhunamure Ecobank Nig Ltd, 236 Obodoukwu Road, Ogbaru Market, Onitsha, Anambra State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsde.v5i2.8386

Keywords:

International Business, International Relations, Language Economics, Language Policy, Linguistic Power, Multilingualism, Trade

Abstract

Language as a means of communication operates as an economic resource, an organizational capability, a policy instrument, and a medium of international power. This study synthesizes 65 peer-reviewed studies published between 1990 and 2026 across multinational business, trade and labor economics, language policy, international relations and multilingual marketing. The study made use of thematic stratification in comparing how linguistic competence, distance, hierarchy and institutional regulation shape cross-border exchange. Evidence from multinational enterprises shows that common corporate languages can accelerate coordination while redistributing status, trust, participation and access to knowledge. Economic research links shared language and translation capacity to trade intensity, market entry, migrant earnings, language acquisition and development. Policy studies also reveal that official language regimes allocate public resources and political recognition, with multilingual arrangements producing uneven access to institutions. International relations scholarship identifies rhetoric, discourse and sociolinguistic representation as mechanisms through which security communities, diplomatic attractions and legitimate identities are formed. Marketing research finds that code-switching and language congruity influence persuasion, emotional intensity, and perceptions of multinational and local brands as well. Across synthesized studies, language reduces transaction costs while creating distributive effects that conventional efficiency measures often conceal. Moreover, the synthesis further advances a multilevel framework in which linguistic capital affects individual mobility, organizational governance, market integration and geopolitical authority. It identifies digital language management, virtual work, procurement design and fairness in multilingual institutions as priorities for future research and policy evaluation across diverse contemporary regional and sectoral settings worldwide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Back, H., & Piekkari, R. (2024). Language-based discrimination in multilingual organizations: A comparative study of migrant professionals’ experiences across physical and virtual spaces. Journal of World Business, 59(3), 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2024.101518

Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Björkman, I. (2007). Language fluency, socialization and inter-unit relationships in Chinese and Finnish subsidiaries. Management and Organization Review, 3(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00060.x

Beenstock, M., Chiswick, B. R., & Repetto, G. L. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance and country of origin on immigrant language skills: Application to Israel. International Migration, 39(3), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00155

Bleakley, H., & Chin, A. (2004). Language skills and earnings: Evidence from childhood immigrants. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323031067

Brannen, M. Y., Piekkari, R., & Tietze, S. (2014). The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.24

Clots-Figueras, I., & Masella, P. (2013). Education, language and identity. The Economic Journal, 123(570), F332–F357. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12051

de Silva, M. (2026). Language-bargaining in the Council of the European Union: Meaning negotiations and the concept of gender equality. Journal of European Public Policy, 33(3), 968–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2442077

Deltas, G., & Evenett, S. (2020). Language as a barrier to entry: Foreign competition in Georgian public procurement. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 73, 102616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102616

Dustmann, C., & Fabbri, F. (2003). Language proficiency and labour market performance of immigrants in the UK. The Economic Journal, 113(489), 695–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.t01-1-00151

Egger, P. H., & Lassmann, A. (2012). The language effect in international trade: A meta-analysis. Economics Letters, 116(2), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.018

Fidrmuc, J., & Fidrmuc, J. (2016). Foreign languages and trade: Evidence from a natural experiment. Empirical Economics, 50(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-0999-7

Fierke, K. M. (2002). Links across the abyss: Language and logic in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 46(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00236

Fredriksson, R., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Piekkari, R. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual organization. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(4), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610713879

Gazzola, M. (2006). Managing multilingualism in the European Union: Language policy evaluation for the European Parliament. Language Policy, 5(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-006-9032-5

Gazzola, M. (2016). Multilingual communication for whom? Language policy and fairness in the European Union. European Union Politics, 17(4), 546–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516657672

Ginsburgh, V., Melitz, J., & Toubal, F. (2017). Foreign language learning and trade. Review of International Economics, 25(2), 320–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12268

Ginsburgh, V., Ortuño-Ortín, I., & Weber, S. (2007). Learning foreign languages: Theoretical and empirical implications of the Selten and Pool model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(3–4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.10.005

Hansen, L. (2000). The Little Mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020501

Harzing, A.-W., & Feely, A. J. (2008). The language barrier and its implications for HQ-subsidiary relationships. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600810848827

Harzing, A.-W., Köster, K., & Magner, U. (2011). Babel in business: The language barrier and its solutions in the HQ-subsidiary relationship. Journal of World Business, 46(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.07.005

Hayfron, J. E. (2001). Language training, language proficiency and earnings of immigrants in Norway. Applied Economics, 33(15), 1971–1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840010018630

Henderson, J. K. (2005). Language diversity in international management teams. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2005.11043722

Hodges, A., & Seawright, L. (2023). Transnational technical communication: English as a business lingua franca in engineering workplaces. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231154860

Hutchinson, W. K. (2002). Does ease of communication increase trade? Commonality of language and bilateral trade. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49(5), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9485.00247

Isphording, I. E., & Otten, S. (2013). The costs of Babylon—Linguistic distance in applied economics. Review of International Economics, 21(2), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12041

Isphording, I. E., & Otten, S. (2014). Linguistic barriers in the destination language acquisition of immigrants. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 105, 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.027

Janssens, M., Lambert, J., & Steyaert, C. (2004). Developing language strategies for international companies: The contribution of translation studies. Journal of World Business, 39(4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2004.08.006

Junnier, F. (2024). English as a lingua franca discourse in European Union higher education and research policy. European Journal of Language Policy, 16(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2024.8

Krebs, R. R., & Jackson, P. T. (2007). Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284

Krishna, A., & Ahluwalia, R. (2008). Language choice in advertising to bilinguals: Asymmetric effects for multinationals versus local firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1086/592130

Ku, H., & Zussman, A. (2010). Lingua franca: The role of English in international trade. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.03.013

Laitin, D. D., & Ramachandran, R. (2016). Language policy and human development. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000265

Lauring, J., Jonasson, C., Sanden, G. R., & Peltokorpi, V. (2025). Digital international language management: Opportunities and challenges for multilingual organizations. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-08-2024-0188

Lohmann, J. (2011). Do language barriers affect trade? Economics Letters, 110(2), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.10.023

Luna, D., & Peracchio, L. A. (2005). Advertising to bilingual consumers: The impact of code-switching on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 760–765. https://doi.org/10.1086/426609

Luna, D., Peracchio, L. A., & de Juan, M. D. (2003). The impact of language and congruity on persuasion in multicultural e-marketing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/153276603768344771

Luo, Y., & Shenkar, O. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400197

Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, D., & Welch, L. (1999a). Adopting a common corporate language: IHRM implications. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851999340387

Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, D., & Welch, L. (1999b). In the shadow: The impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational. International Business Review, 8(4), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(99)00015-3

Mattern, J. B. (2005). Why “soft power” isn’t so soft: Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031601

Melitz, J. (2008). Language and foreign trade. European Economic Review, 52(4), 667–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.05.002

Melitz, J., & Toubal, F. (2014). Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. Journal of International Economics, 93(2), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.04.004

Milliken, J. (1999). The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003

Nakagawa, M., & Sugasawa, S. (2022). Linguistic distance and economic development: A cross-country analysis. Review of Development Economics, 26(2), 793–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12850

Neeley, T. B. (2013). Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organization Science, 24(2), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0739

Neeley, T. B., & Dumas, T. L. (2016). Unearned status gain: Evidence from a global language mandate. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 14–43. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0535

Nye, J. S., Jr. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699

Peltokorpi, V., & Vaara, E. (2014). Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: Productive and counterproductive effects of language-sensitive recruitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 600–622. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.1

Piller, I. (2001). Identity constructions in multilingual advertising. Language in Society, 30(2), 153–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501002019

Pool, J. (1991). The official language problem. American Political Science Review, 85(2), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963171

Pouliot, V. (2008). The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization, 62(2), 257–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080090

Puntoni, S., de Langhe, B., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2009). Bilingualism and the emotional intensity of advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.1086/595022

Reiche, B. S., Harzing, A.-W., & Pudelko, M. (2015). Why and how does shared language affect subsidiary knowledge inflows? A social identity perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(5), 528–551. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.3

Rivera-Batiz, F. L. (1990). English language proficiency and the economic progress of immigrants. Economics Letters, 34(3), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(90)90134-M

Śliwa, M., & Johansson, M. (2014). How non-native English-speaking staff are evaluated in linguistically diverse organizations: A sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(9), 1133–1151. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.21

Steyaert, C., Ostendorp, A., & Gaibrois, C. (2011). Multilingual organizations as “linguascapes”: Negotiating the position of English through discursive practices. Journal of World Business, 46(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.07.003

Tange, H., & Lauring, J. (2009). Language management and social interaction within the multilingual workplace. Journal of Communication Management, 13(3), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540910976671

Tenzer, H., Pudelko, M., & Harzing, A.-W. (2014). The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 508–535. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.64

Tenzer, H., Pudelko, M., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2021). The impact of language barriers on knowledge processing in multinational teams. Journal of World Business, 56(2), 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101184

van Parijs, P. (2000). The ground floor of the world: On the socio-economic consequences of linguistic globalization. International Political Science Review, 21(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512100212006

van Parijs, P. (2004). Europe’s linguistic challenge. European Journal of Sociology, 45(1), 113–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975604001407

Volk, S., Köhler, T., & Pudelko, M. (2014). Brain drain: The cognitive neuroscience of foreign language processing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(7), 862–885. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.26

Welch, D. E., & Welch, L. S. (2008). The importance of language in international knowledge transfer. Management International Review, 48(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0019-7

Xia, Q., & Zhou, B. (2024). The impact of common language on international trade: Evidence from Korean language. PLOS ONE, 19(8), e0307914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307914

Xu, C., & Liu, X. (2023). The economic value of language in China: How important is Mandarin proficiency in the Chinese labor market? A bounding approach. Labour Economics, 84, 102393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102393

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Mazaza-Jere, T., Ododa, C., Junior, O. G., Yusuf, Y. A., Arobaga, O. G., & Uhunamure, V. L. (2026). Language as Economic Power: A Review of its Role in Global Business, International Relations and Public Policy. American Journal of Social Development and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsde.v5i2.8386

Similar Articles

1-10 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.