Principal-Agent Perspectives on Payment Strategies and Motivation: A Case Study of University of Cape Coast CoDE Weekend Online Distance Learning Programme

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i3.6766

Keywords:

Contractual Relationships, Incentive Mechanisms, Online Learning, Payment Practices, Principal-Agent Theory, Tutor Motivation

Abstract

This research investigates the influence of payment practices on tutor motivation within the University of Cape Coast’s College of Distance Education (CoDE) Weekend Online Distance Learning Programme, employing the Principal-Agent Theory as an analytical framework. The study addresses how strategic delays and rushed payments may create opportunistic behaviors among tutors, affecting their effort, commitment, and overall programme effectiveness. Thus, recognizing the potential for opportunistic behaviors arising from delayed or hurried payments, the research investigates how such payment strategies influence tutors’ effort, commitment, and overall performance. A mixed-methods approach is utilized, combining quantitative surveys administered to tutors and qualitative interviews with administrators and tutors to gain nuanced insights into their perceptions and experiences. The study aims to identify the extent to which payment timing and structure affect motivation and engagement, and how these factors subsequently impact the quality and effectiveness of the distance learning programme. Anticipated findings are expected to reveal critical links between incentive alignment and tutor effort, offering evidence-based recommendations for designing sustainable payment systems that enhance motivation and accountability. The research contributes to the broader understanding of contractual incentive mechanisms in distance education and provides practical policy implications for optimizing payment strategies to foster long-term engagement and educational quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Luke Boryang Liekum, Gbewaa College of Education, Pusiga-Bawku, Ghana

    Luke Boryang LIEKUM, MPhil,

    Tutor, Department of French Gbewaa College of Education P.O.Box 157, Pusiga Bawku, Ghana
    Contact: +233209407911/+233249435300 liekum@gmail.com lbliekum@st.ug.edu.gh  

References

Bruno, B., Faggini, M., & Parziale, A. (2017). Motivation, incentives and performance: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(12), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n12p29

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Growth of organizational support: Future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 423–429.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Gneezy, U. (2005). Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review, 95(1), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828662

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.

Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74–91.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jiang, N. (2025). Research on incentive mechanisms in the data market: A multitask principal‑agent model. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/.

Kaufman, R., & Watkins, B. (2014). Motivation and distance education: Factors influencing teacher engagement. Distance Education Quarterly, 19(2), 45–58.

Laffont, J.-J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model. Princeton University Press.

Moore, M. G. (2018). Distance education: A systems view. Routledge.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.

Park, T.-Y., Park, S., & Barry, B. (2022). Incentive effects on ethics. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0251

Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.

Silverman, K. (2016). Incentives and motivation. PMC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/.

Van der Merwe, A., & Moalosi, R. (2015). Incentive structures and motivation of distance education tutors. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(2), 245–259.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Liekum, L. B. . (2026). Principal-Agent Perspectives on Payment Strategies and Motivation: A Case Study of University of Cape Coast CoDE Weekend Online Distance Learning Programme. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation , 5(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i3.6766

Similar Articles

1-10 of 159

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.