Probing the Impact of the Eclectic Approach in the Reading Comprehension Competence of Basic Schools Pupils in Ghana: With Kuka Primary School in Focus

Authors

  • Luke Boryang Liekum Department of Languages, Gbewaa College of Education, Pusiga-Bawku, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i6.808

Keywords:

Eclectic, Approach, Probing, Reading activities, Comprehensive Reading, Competence

Abstract

The paper caused an investigation into the causes of Kuka M/A Primary pupils’ inability to read comprehension passages and to sustain their interest in reading comprehension using eclectic approach. Literature was provided to support the study. Action research design was used in the study. A sample size of fifty (50) pupils was drawn from the entire school population for data gathering purposes. The instruments employed for the study were tests and observation while data were analyzed using frequency tables. The study revealed that lack of participatory activity in the classrooms, lack of pre-reading skills, absenteeism, and others were the causes of the pupils’ inability to read. The study further revealed that using an eclectic approach improves pupils’ performance in class. It became known that most of the pupils were now interested in reading comprehension passages very well because the lessons adopted the interactive activity-based approach. A number of recommendations were made to assist stakeholders of the school to make good use of this current study to improve upon their performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afari, S. & Okunner, B. (2005). English teachers guide for Junior High Schools, Accra-Ghana: Afram Publication Ltd.

Amoateng, D. (1994). Causes of reading difficulties, Presbyterian Publication: Kumasi-Ghana.

Anderson, P. (1994). Developing children’s classroom listening strategies, The Reading Teachers Press: London.

Annor, K.A (1997). An Assessment of the service quality delivery in tertiary education, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. K.N.U.S.T Press: Kumasi - Ghana

Asamoah, A., Kutor, N. & Chilisa, B. (2004). Teaching English in basic schools, Institute for Education Development and Extension: Accra.

Boyer, L. (2008). “Response to intervention: implementation of a state wide system”. In Rural special Education Quarterly 27(4) 18-26. Accessed on the 13th January 2020.

Cobbetal, T., Zahar, R. & Spada N. (2003). Acquiring vocabulary through reading. Effects of frequency and contextual richness, The Canadian modern language Review.

Distance Learning Academy (2020, January 15). English as a language. Retrieved from www.reacher.net

Eckert, M. A., Lombardino, L. J., & Leonard, C. M. (2001). Planar Asymmetry Tips the Phonological Playground and Environment Raises the Bar, In Child Development. 74 (4)988-100. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8624.00330

Eckert, M. (2001). McKnight Brain institute of University of Florida. Florida University Press. Florida.

Encarta Students (2009). Improving reading skills in English. https//:www.llahmazulaeman83wordPress.com.

Foerch, B. (1998). National Association for the Education of young children, London: MacMillan Education Ltd.

Harmer, D. (2007). How to teach English (New Edition), Cambridge, UK Pearson Education Limited.

Harris, D. (2007). Educational leadership, reading and learning; closing the vocabulary, Ministry of Education Press: Oakland.

Jannes, S. (2006). Reading assessment and instruction for all learners, New York: Guilford Press.

Jeans, C. & Stahl, B. (2004). Practice in early reading series. Dorrance Publishing Company: UK.

Kumar, C.P (2013).The Eclectic method; Theory and its application to the learning of English. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications.

Larsen & Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in language teaching (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Li, W. (2012). An Eclectic method of College English Teaching. In Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3(1), 166-171.

Margaret, S. and Snowling, A. (2013). Developing Reading. In Journal of the British Academy, British Academy Publication: Britain.

Ministry of Education (2004). National Reading strategy-department of education. www.education.gov.zalinkclick.aspx? 20/07/2020

Ministry of Education (2004). National Reading strategy-department of education. www.education.gov-zalinkclick.aspx?

Mitchell, W. (2003). Improving reading skill in English, University of Florida: Florida University Press.

Morgan, D. (2014). Morgan learning Solutions. www.helpingeverychildtoread.com/ind.

Panel, D. (2010). Social Research methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th Ed.). United States: Pearson Education Limited.

Rijlaarsdam, G. (2004). Teachers’ task demands, students test expectations, and actual test content”. In British Journal of Education psychology, 74, 205-220.

Rocket, R. (2014). Developing Reading abilities, Guilford Press: London

Rosenblatt (1994). Exemplary literacy practices in transitional strategies instruction, The Guilford Press: London

Savage, J. (2000). Participative observation: Standing in the shoes of others? In Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 324-339

Sir-Francis, B (1997). Effective reading skills, Bethany house publishers: Minnesota.

Suyanto, C. (2007). Reading Process: Brief Edition of Reading process and practice (3rd Edition). Miami University: Heinemann.

Tarignan, B. (2008). Reading for understanding. In Towards a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. U.S: Department of Education.

Tsadiday, S.W.K (1993). A Comprehensive Guide to English methods for teachers in training, Shepherd Printing Press: Accra New-town.

Urmarian, M. (2001). Learning to read at Beginner level. Bristol Publication Limited: U.K.

Wattle, F. (2002). Guide to reading comprehension, University of Zambia; Institute of Education publication: Zambia.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-04

How to Cite

Liekum, L. B. (2022). Probing the Impact of the Eclectic Approach in the Reading Comprehension Competence of Basic Schools Pupils in Ghana: With Kuka Primary School in Focus. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 1(6), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i6.808