Millenial E- Learning Systems and Their Academic Performance in Mathematics

Authors

  • Ma. Chona S. Rizada Graduate School, Palawan State University, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines
  • Raymond P. Rey Graduate School, Palawan State University, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i2.1331

Keywords:

Millennial Learners, E- Learners, Math Learning Systems, E-Learning Academic Performance, Mathematics

Abstract

This paper uses digital and technologically enhanced learning processes to present the millennial generation’s E-learning systems in mathematics courses, attitudes, and academic performance. It aims to determine the e-learning systems of college students in their mathematics classes and their effects on their academic performance. This study used qualitative and quantitative methods and descriptive–correlational and descriptive-comparative research methods involving 72 college students taking p mathematics courses. The results show that regarding e-learning materials, the majority strongly agreed with preferred using Technologies to solve problems using application software, web assignments submitted on yahoo chat, emails, messengers, and solving problems in class using a calculator’s math lab and math way. Millennial e-learners prefer Online based learning, Video conferencing, yahoo groups, group chats, messengers’ groups, video calls, emails, Twitter, Instagram, Math software, and online chat. Students’ academic performance improved when the e-learning system was used, and it was found that their academic grades differed significantly when e-learning systems over traditional learning systems. The E-learning style is recommended in teaching mathematics courses.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alch, M.L. (2000). Get ready for a new type of worker in the workplace: The net generation: supervision, 61(4), 3.

Coomes. M. D., & DeBard, R. eds. (2004). Serving the millennial generation. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.

Davidson, C. N. (2007). We can ignore the influence of digital technologies. Education Digest, 73(1), 15-18.

Dede, C. (2005). Planning for the new millennial learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. 15.1-15.22 in Educating the Net Generation. Oblinger, D. G. and Oblinger, J. L. eds., an EDUACAUSE eBook.

Elam, C., Stratton, T. & Gibson, D. D. (2007). Welcoming a new generation to college: Millennial students. Journal of College Admission, 2, 1-25.

Frand, J.L. (2000). Information age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education.Educause Review, 35, 16-4.

Githen, R. P. (2006). Cautions: Implementing interpersonal interaction in workplace e-learning. Tech Trends, 50(5), 21-27.

Hawtrey, K. (2007). Using experiential learning techniques. Journal of Economic Education, 38(2), 143-52.

Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

Manochehri, N. & Young, J. I. (2005). The impact of student learning styles with web-based instructor-based learning on student knowledge and satisfaction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 313-316.

Marías, J. (1970). Generations: A historical method Translated by H.C. Raley, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

Marston, C. (2005). Motivating what is in it for me? workforce: Managing across generations.

Martin, C. A. (2005). From high maintenance to high productivity: What managers need to know about Generation Y. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(1), 39-4.

McCasland, M. (2005). Mobile marketing to millennials. Young Consumers, Quarter 2, 8-15.

Messineo, M. Gaither, G. Bolt, J. & Ritchey, K. (2007).Inexperienced versus experienced students’ expectations for active learning in large classes. College Teaching, 55(3), 125–33.

Murray, J. P. (2004). Nursing: The next generation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 25(3), 106.

Newlin, M. H., Lavooy, M. J. & Wang, A. Y. (2005). An experimental comparison conventional DNSns web-based instructional formats. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 327–336.

Nicholas, A.J. & Lewis, J.K. (2008). Millennial Attitudes Toward Books E-Book sooks. The International Journal of the Book, 5(2), 1–92.

Pelton, L. E., True, S. L. (2004). Teaching business ethics: Why gen y? Marketing Education Review, 14(3), 63–70.

Shannon, D. M., Johnson, T. E., Searcy, S. & Lott, A. (2002). Survey professionals using electronic surveys. ERIC Digests, EDO-TM-02-02 4 pages.

Skiba, D. J. (2006). The Millennials: Have they arrived at your school of nursing? Nursing Education Perspectives, 25(6), 370-371.

Smith, J. W., & Clurman, A. (1997). Rocking the ages: The Yankelevich report on generational marketing. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

Trei, L. (2006, November 15). Researchers study how technology shapes how students learn. Stanford Report. Retrieved December 2007 http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2006/november15/Barron-111506.html

Trotter, A. (2007). Projects probe new media’s role in changing the face of learning. Education Week, 7(14), 1–10.

University College London (UCL) CIBER Group. (2008). Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future (CIBER Briefing paper; 9). London.

Zemke, R. Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, baby boomers, Xers, and nesters in your workplace. New York: American Management Association.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-07

How to Cite

Rizada, M. C. S., & Rey, R. P. (2023). Millenial E- Learning Systems and Their Academic Performance in Mathematics. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 2(2), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i2.1331