From Remediation to Retention: Assessing the Effectiveness of Academic Support Systems in a Local College Math Education Program

Authors

  • Noel A. Comia City College of Calapan, Guinobatan, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines
  • Qiarah Syrah A. Chavez City College of Calapan, Guinobatan, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v4i5.5687

Keywords:

Mathematics Education, Performance, Remediation, Retention, Tutoring

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between institutionalized remediation practices and the academic performance of Bachelor of Secondary Education major in Mathematics (BSED Math) students at City College of Calapan. Notwithstanding the long-standing support systems—including Consultation Hours, Math-Tulong Tutorials, and Guidance Counseling—the persistent existence of academic difficulties and low course completion rates in mathematics reinforced the need to evaluate the interventions’ effectiveness. The study employed a descriptive-correlational and comparative research design. The requisite data were gathered through validated survey instruments administered to 108 third- and fourth-year BSED Math students who had been recipient of the remediation pratices. Academic performance was evaluated on the basis of final grades in core mathematics subjects, specifically in Algebra, Calculus, Geometry, and Statistics. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s r correlation, and independent samples t-tests were used to analyze the association between remediation exposure and academic achievements. The results revealed a compelling positive correlation between Consultation Hours and academic performance, a relatively robust relationship for Math-Tulong Tutorials, and a moderate but significant connection for Guidance Counseling. Fourth-year students exhibited significantly higher mathematics performance than their third-year counterparts, establishing a persuasive manifestation of cumulative benefits emergent from sustained remediation exposure. Nevertheless, positive outcomes do not reflect efficient utility of mediation, for findings indicated underutilization of services and deficient coordination, particularly arising from the counseling domain. The study recommended a Contextualized Enhanced Remediation Program (CERP) to be further developed as the IMPACT Program, intending to consolidate and strengthen remediation through an integrated, structured, and data-driven approach. The study reveals that while current interventions yield academic benefits, a more holistic, organized and adaptive remediation framework is essential to improve outcomes and support student retention in the mathematics teacher education degree program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abad, M. A., & Florencio, J. B. (2022). Structured academic counseling programs and their effect on student planning and task management. Journal of Student Services, 11(1), 45–59.

Balazo, G. F. O. (2021). Struggling learners’ achievement level using electronic Strategic Intervention Material in Mathematics (eSIMath). American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology, 5(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v5i2.96

Barcelona, A. (2022). Upgrading the Problem-Solving Experiences of the Primary Students Using an Online Singapore Mathematics Platform. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(3), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i3.750

Bautista, R. M., & Francisco, L. D. (2022). Determinants of academic performance in college mathematics: A study among preservice teachers. Philippine Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), 22–37.

Bernardo, F. C., & Cruz, M. A. (2023). Collaborative academic advising: Linking guidance services with instructional support. Educational Support Quarterly, 10(3), 14–28.

Bierer, S. B., Tori, C. J., & Chen, Y. Y. (2015). Variability in remediation: What works and what we know. Journal of Remedial Strategies in Education, 5(2), 119–134.

Burch, P., & Good, A. (2021). Equity issues in college remediation: Who benefits most? Higher Education and Equity Journal, 9(1), 33–47.

Cabral, R. D., & Manalo, J. R. (2022). Improving remedial instruction through teacher training in Philippine public colleges. Asian Journal of Teacher Education, 4(2), 66–79.

Cheng, K. P., & Sarmiento, R. M. (2023). Sustained remediation and its impact on midterm and final math performance. Education Research in Practice, 12(4), 54–70.

Cleland, J. A., Knight, L. V., Rees, C. E., Tracey, S., & Bond, C. M. (2010). Remediation: Three steps to academic recovery. Journal of Educational Diagnostics, 7(1), 100–115.

Delos Santos, A. G., Martinez, E. P., & Bacay, S. P. (2022). Predicting student success in Algebra and Statistics through remedial engagement. Mathematical Education Quarterly, 14(3), 20–36.

Dizon, R. M., Santos, P. A., & Medina, L. J. (2023). Integrated academic remediation models in tertiary education. Southeast Asian Review of Education, 5(1), 38–53.

Domingo, V. F., & Caballero, M. A. (2023). Instructional scaffolding during consultation: Its impact on college math performance. Journal of Higher Math Pedagogy, 8(2), 59–75.

Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole Publishing.

Garcia, K. T., & Sevilla, M. O. (2024). From fragmentation to integration: Academic support systems in teacher education. Research in Higher Learning, 9(1), 77–90.

Ghosh, L. R., & Mendez, D. J. (2022). Integrated remediation frameworks: Supporting student retention through support convergence. International Journal of Remediation Studies, 6(4), 43–61.

Gonzales, H. R., & Yambao, M. C. (2023). Using diagnostics to direct math remediation: A case from public HEIs. Philippine Journal of Assessment and Learning, 7(3), 28–46.

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.

Hernandez, R. L., & Ilagan, T. R. (2021). Tracking academic recovery in mathematics through proactive interventions. Journal of Educational Improvement, 5(3), 95–108.

Kuhn, D. (2022). Peer learning and sociocultural construction of knowledge in mathematics education. Journal of Sociocognitive Development, 9(2), 101–115.

Lee, J. M., Reyes, K. A., & Sandoval, C. G. (2022). Aligning consultation with course pacing: A study on optimization of faculty office hours. Journal of Academic Resource Management, 7(4), 17–34.

Lim, C. G., & De Vera, R. P. (2021). Educational statistics applications. Manila: Blue Pages Publishing.

Lopez, J. C., & Rivera, P. D. (2022). Bridging foundational gaps: Strategies in college mathematics remediation. Southeast Asian Journal of Math Teaching, 5(2), 43–58.

Madrid, A. R., & Uy, B. M. (2023). Flexible and dynamic remediation in public higher education. Education and Innovation, 6(3), 92–105.

Martin, E. G., & Javier, R. T. (2023). Evaluating Math-Tulong: Peer tutorial impact on preservice math teachers. Philippine Journal of Peer Learning, 3(1), 25–39.

Morales, J. T., & Quinto, L. C. (2021). Aligning remediation to national standards in teacher education. Academic Performance Studies, 4(2), 51–64.

Nguyen, T. A., & Morales, F. J. (2021). The effects of structured consultation sessions on math performance. International Journal of Educational Practice, 12(2), 80–94.

Ong, S. L., & Herrera, M. T. (2024). Consultation sessions and student engagement before exams. Educational Supports Today, 9(2), 45–60.

Ramos, E. G., & Sison, M. F. (2024). Academic counseling and math course completion: An institutional study. Philippine Journal of Higher Education Research, 10(1), 61–78.

Reyes, A. F., & Sandoval, C. (2023). Consultation, feedback, and structured support: Optimizing student understanding. Journal of Institutional Academic Support, 7(1), 33–48.

Rivera, S. A., & Santos, J. F. (2024). Contextualizing remediation in Philippine local colleges. Education Policy and Practice Review, 6(2), 88–104.

Salas, J. P., Gutierrez, A. C., & Balagtas, E. M. (2021). Systemic remediation in tertiary mathematics education: A national survey. Journal of Mathematics Curriculum, 5(1), 70–89.

Sarmiento, J. L., & Lim, F. D. (2021). Peer-assisted mathematics learning in low-pressure environments. Learning Interactions in College, 3(2), 40–55.

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.

Snyder, C. J., Fischer, R. A., & McClain, J. A. (2019). On the challenges of defining effective remediation. Journal of Education Research and Improvement, 11(1), 88–103.

Tan, M. S., & Evangelista, J. P. (2022). Context-responsive remediation for underprepared college students. Journal of Educational Interventions, 6(1), 52–68.

Torres, J. L., & Dela Peña, M. R. (2021). The academic side of counseling: Structuring student success services. Asian Journal of Counseling, 9(1), 19–34.

Torres, M. A., Villanueva, D. L., & Reyes, C. T. (2023). Faculty mentoring and accuracy of peer tutorials. Journal of Higher Academic Learning, 6(4), 73–90.

Usher, E. L., & Rosen, H. L. (2023). Extending self-efficacy theory in academic support services. Journal of Educational Psychology and Practice, 15(2), 59–76.

Villanueva, D. L., & Reyes, F. J. (2024). Effective peer remediation through documentation and training. Philippine College Tutorial Studies, 4(2), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.953

Zhang, Y., & Gomez, R. T. (2022). Enhancing student reasoning through structured peer-assisted learning. International Journal of Math Education Studies, 11(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.2008036

Downloads

Published

2025-09-25

How to Cite

Comia, N. A., & Chavez, Q. S. A. (2025). From Remediation to Retention: Assessing the Effectiveness of Academic Support Systems in a Local College Math Education Program. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 4(5), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v4i5.5687