Differentiated Instruction in Mathematics Achievement: Validating Mckenzie’s Domain of Multiple Intelligences

Authors

  • Kay Rica A. Palma Senior High School Principal, NU Davao, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v5i1.6544

Keywords:

Differentiated Instruction, Mathematics Education, Mathematics, McKenzie’s Domain of Multiple Intelligences

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of using McKenzie’s domain of multiple intelligences as a way of validating differentiated instruction in response to mathematics achievement. This study used the nonequivalent control group design. The instruments used in this study is a 90-item adopted Multiple Intelligence test and a 30-item teacher-made test for the topics on The Embodiment of Circles and Introduction to Coordinate Geometry. The difference between the pre-test and post-test of the experimental and control groups is generally not significant. Although the study failed to reject the null hypothesis stating that there is no significant difference of the mean gain scores of the experimental and control groups, the increase of the mean gain scores of the experimental and control group implies that there is a positive development in the math achievement of the students if differentiated instruction is applied when students are grouped according to McKenzie’s domain of intelligences. Appropriate assessment must be employed when applying differentiated instruction to identify the student’s dominant domains of intelligences. Moreover, although the traditional technique had a positive impact in the mathematical achievement of students, varied use of techniques may also be implied to address their needs. The differentiated instruction by McKenzie may significantly impact students’ academic performance; therefore, it should be encouraged.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Affholder, L. P. (2003). Differentiated instruction in inclusive elementary classrooms [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Kansas.

Altun, M. (2000). Mathematics teaching: For the education facilities and elementary education teachers (8th ed.). Erkam Publishing.

Aranda, M. R., & Zamora, J. (2016). Using differentiated instruction in improving the academic performance of students in Filipino language [Unpublished manuscript]. National University.

Arespacochaga, M. R. (2011, February). Leap Educator’s Conference 2011: Teaching math effectively. https://www.leap-phillipines.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/049-Breakout-Teaching-HS-Math-Effectively.pdf

Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Baykul, Y. (2004). *Mathematics teaching at elementary education for 1-5 classes* (7th ed.). Pagem A Publishing.

Blozowich, D. G. (2001). Differentiated instruction in heterogeneously grouped sixth grade classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, Immaculata College]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Bosch, N. (2001). Differentiated curriculum. http://www.adifferentplace.org/differentiated.htm

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.

Chua, S., Tan, J., Ubarro, A., Cayetano, M. A., & Guerrero, R. (2015). Soaring 21st century mathematics: Grade 10 (K to 12). Phoenix Publishing House.

Coleman, M. R. (2001). Curriculum differentiation: Sophistication. Gifted Child Today, 24(2), 24–26.

Demircioglu, H., & Guneysu, S. (2000). The new targets and the multiple intelligence approach. The Journal of Child Development and Education, 1(1), 15–22.

Esparrago, M., Reyes, N., & Manalo, C. (2015). The new grade 10 next century mathematics. Phoenix Publishing House.

Gallego, M. K. F. (2024). School climate and burnout among mathematics teachers as basis for teacher empowerment action plan: A convergent parallel design. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(4), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v3i4.2585

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). Fontana Press.

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligence. In Mindanao eLearning Space, Module 2: Your many intelligences. Department of Education, Philippines.

Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2013). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t fit all (3rd ed.). Corwin.

Guild, P. B. (2001). Diversity, learning style and culture. New Horizons for Learning. http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/styles_guild.htm

Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. http://www.cast.org/ncac/classroompractice/cpractice02.doc

Hess, M. A. (1999, March 26). Teaching in mixed ability classrooms. Wisconsin Education Association Council. http://www.weac.org/kids/1998-99/march99/differ.htm

Hodge, P. H. (1997). An analysis of the impact of a prescribed staff development program in differentiated instruction on student achievement and the attitudes of teachers and parents toward that instruction [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Alabama.

Johnsen, S. (2003). Adapting instruction with heterogeneous groups. Gifted Child Today, 26(3), 5–6.

Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (1997). Teaching trigonometry. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 30–52.

Koeze, P. A. (2007). Differentiated instruction: The effect on student achievement in an elementary school [Master’s thesis, Grand Valley State University]. ScholarWorks@GVSU.

Konstantinou-Katzi, P., Tsolaki, E., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Koutselini, M. (2013). Differentiation of teaching and learning mathematics: An action research study in tertiary education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(3), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.714491

Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34–62.

Lee-Chua, Q. (2007). Why is math so hard? And many other tips to keep a sound mind/body. Anvil Publishing.

MacGillivray, L., & Rueda, R. (2001). Listening to inner city teachers of English language learners: Differentiating literacy instruction (CIERA Report No. 1-005). Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. http://www.ciera.org/library/archive/2001-05/0105McRued.htm

McAdamis, S. (2001). Teachers tailor their instruction to meet a variety of student needs. Journal of Staff Development, 22(2), 1–5.

McBride, B. (2004). Data-driven instructional methods: “One-strategy-fits-all” doesn’t work in real classrooms. T.H.E. Journal, 31(11), 38–40.

McGraw-Hill. (2008). California geometry: Concepts, skills, and problem solving, teacher wraparound edition. McGraw-Hill Companies.

McKenzie, W. (2002). Multiple intelligences and instructional technology: A manual for every mind. International Society for Technology in Education.

Montillado, C. J. (2023). Metacognitive awareness and attitude towards communicative approach of junior high school students. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 2(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i5.1745

Morgan, H. (2014). Maximizing student success with differentiated learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2013.832130

Mulroy, H., & Eddinger, K. (2003, June). Differentiation and literacy [Paper presentation]. Institute on Inclusive Education, Rochester, NY, United States.

Muthomi, M. W., & Mbugua, Z. K. (2014). Effectiveness of differentiated instruction on secondary school students achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 4(1), 116–122. http://www.ijastnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_1_January_2014/12.pdf

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.

National Science Foundation. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of the traditional lecture method. Retrieved June 2013, from http://citrl.wceruw.org/diversityresources/resources/resource-book/tagesanddisadvantagesofthetraditionallecturemethod.htm

Oronce, O., & Mendoza, M. (2015). *E-math 10*. Rex Book Store.

Philippine Department of Education. (2015). Philippine education for all 2015: Implementation and challenges. http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Philippines/Philippines_EFA_MDA.pdf

Raymunde, P. P., Jr., Lapuz, J. B., Morre, M. C., Jr., Uyangoren, J. R., Gomez, J. J. M., & Villamil, J. A. (2024). Navigating the academic gap: A phenomenological inquiry on the experiences of teachers in DepEd’s Catch-Up Fridays. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(5), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v3i5.2980

Robinson, E. M. (2004). Teacher decision-making in utilizing differentiated instruction [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Marywood University.

Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills of learning disabled children. The Journal of Special Education, 19(3), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698501900307

Silabay, J. A. (2008). Effectiveness of contemporary instructional process in enhancing mathematics competence of sophomore high school students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Southern Philippines.

Sizer, T. R. (1999). No two are quite alike. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 6–11.

Strong, R. W., Silver, H. F., & Perini, M. J. (2001). Making students as important as standards. Educational Leadership, 59(3), 56–61.

Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935–947.

Sucuano, J. (2012). Effectiveness of convergent mastery technique in teaching selected topics in high school trigonometry [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Southeastern Philippines.

Takele, M. (2009). Teaching-learning of trigonometric function in secondary schools in Jimma Zone [Master’s thesis, Addis Ababa University]. http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/2873

Taylor, J. (2010, September 10). Confusing stats terms explained: Standard deviation. Statistics Mental. http://jeremyjaytaylor.squarespace.com/smmctheblog/confusing-stats-terms-explained-standard-deviation.html

Tello, E. (2010). Making mathematics word problems reliable measure of student mathematics abilities. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 15–26.

The Center for Educational Measurement, Inc. (2013). Stella Maris Academy of Davao diagnostic test result – secondary mathematics [Unpublished raw data].

The Center for Educational Measurement, Inc. (2014). Stella Maris Academy of Davao diagnostic test result – secondary mathematics [Unpublished raw data].

The Center for Educational Measurement, Inc. (2015). Stella Maris Academy of Davao diagnostic test result – secondary mathematics [Unpublished raw data].

Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Differentiated instruction in the regular classroom. Understanding Our Gifted, 14(1), 3–6.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice? Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_11

Tomlinson, C. A., Moon, T. R., & Callahan, C. M. (1998). How well are we addressing academic diversity in the middle school? Middle School Journal, 29(3), 3–11.

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203

Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 5, 147–158. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/227

Tullte, J. (2000). Differentiated classrooms [Report]. Cedar Mountain Academy.

UP NISMED & SEAMEO RECSAM. (2011). Learning to teach and teaching to learn: Improving practice in mathematics classroom through lesson study. University of the Philippines National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development.

Valencerina, M. A. (2013). The effect of cooperative learning method supported with multiple intelligence theory on students’ achievement in mathematics [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Southeastern Philippines.

Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.005

Warlick, D. (2004). Redefining literacy for the 21st century. Linworth Publishing.

White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental design and methods (Methodological Briefs No. 8). UNICEF Office of Research. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/brief_8_quasi-experimental%20design_eng.pdf

Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 5(3), 65–72.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Palma, K. R. A. . (2026). Differentiated Instruction in Mathematics Achievement: Validating Mckenzie’s Domain of Multiple Intelligences. American Journal of Education and Technology, 5(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v5i1.6544

Similar Articles

1-10 of 152

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.