Exploring Identity and Selfhood in A Number: A Freytagian Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v4i2.4684Keywords:
Ethical Dilemmas, Freytag’s Pyramid, Human Cloning, Identity, SelfhoodAbstract
Caryl Churchill’s A Number (2002/2008) explores identity, scientific innovation, and the ethical dilemmas of human cloning, particularly the debate between nature and nurture. The play questions whether identity is shaped by genetics, experiences, or personal choices, raising profound ethical and psychological concerns about the consequences of replicating human life. This study examines how A Number navigates identity and ethical dilemmas through Freytag’s Pyramid, focusing on Salter and his cloned sons: Bernard 1, Bernard 2, and Michael Black. The exposition introduces Salter’s guilt and the origins of the clones, while the rising action builds tension as Bernard 2 confronts his father about his existence, uncovering the unsettling truth about multiple clones and triggering an identity crisis. The climax unfolds when Bernard 1, filled with resentment, confronts Salter and kills Bernard 2, exposing the selfish motives and emotional toll of cloning. In the falling action and resolution, unresolved tensions persist, leaving behind irreversible consequences that provoke reflection on identity, ethics, and scientific responsibility. The play’s open-ended conclusion compels audiences to question the moral implications of cloning and the commodification of human life in an era of rapid technological advancements. To deepen this analysis, this study incorporates Jean Baudrillard’s (1994) concept of simulacrum, which examines how cloning blurs the boundaries between original and copy, and Emmanuel Levinas’s (1969) ethics of the Other, which provides a moral framework for understanding the ethical consequences of treating cloned individuals as disposable entities. By examining these perspectives, this study underscores how A Number interrogates the intersection of identity, ethics, and selfhood, encouraging further exploration of these pressing issues.
Downloads
References
Aston, E. (2003). Feminist views on the English stage. Cambridge University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original
work published 1981)
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bochner, A. (2007a). The clone as simulacrum. Journal of Dramatic Theory, 21(2), 120–135.
Bochner, A. (2007b). The ethics of cloning. Ethics & Social Welfare, 1(1), 91–105.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” Routledge.
Churchill, C. (2008). A number (pp. 161–206). Nick Hern Books. (Original work published 2002)
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Derrida, J. (1995). Archive fever: A Freudian impression (E. Prenowitz, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Freytag, G. (2021). Technique of the drama: An exposition of dramatic composition and art (E. J. MacEwan, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1863)
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper Perennial. (Original work published 1927)
Jaenisch, R., & Wilmut, I. (2001). Don’t clone humans! Science, 291(5513), 2552.
Kass, L. R. (1998). The wisdom of repugnance: Why we should ban the cloning of humans. The New Republic, 216(22), 17–26.
Kass, L. R. (2002). Life, liberty, and the defense of dignity: The challenge for bioethics. Encounter Books.
Lacan, J. (1977). Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Lanza, R. P., Cibelli, J. B., & West, M. D. (1999). Prospects for the use of nuclear transfer in human transplantation. Nature Biotechnology, 17(12), 1171–1174.
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press.
Luckhurst, M. (2015). Caryl Churchill’s dramatic philosophy. Modern Drama, 58(3), 315–332.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1997). Cloning human beings: Report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press.
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Viking.
Sartre, J.-P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism (C. Macomber, Trans.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1946)
Segal, N. (2000). Entwined lives: Twins and what they tell us about human behavior. Dutton.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2005). Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights.
Weber, K. (2008). The clone as the ultimate deferred self. Journal of Postmodern Ethics, 15(2), 86–94.
Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J., & Campbell, K. H. (1997). Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature, 385(6619), 810–813.
Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. MIT Press.
Žižek, S. (2001a). On belief. Routledge.
Žižek, S. (2001b). The fragile absolute: Or, why is the Christian legacy worth fighting for? Verso.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Motikala Subba Dewan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
