Science Teachers’ Experiences with the Spiral Progression Approach in the Philippines: A Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i5.8600Keywords:
Philippine Science Education, Science Teachers, Spiral Progression Approach, Teachers’ ExperienceAbstract
The Spiral Progression Approach (SPA) has been introduced into the science education curriculum in the Philippines for purposes of ensuring continuity, integration, and progressive learning of science concepts by students across different grade levels. However, the literature regarding the experiences of science teachers in implementing this approach is scattered across many areas. This scoping review was carried out in order to identify and consolidate all the available evidence regarding the experiences of science teachers in the implementation of the SPA in the Philippine context. This study used the scoping review methodology framework established by Arksey and O’Malley (2005), supported by JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting frameworks. Ten (10) studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The results indicated that the experiences of the teachers were both positive and challenging at the same time. SPA was seen to be advantageous in fostering continuity of learning, concept reinforcement, engagement of the learners, and wider exposure to different fields of science. However, the persistent difficulties faced included teaching outside the specialization of the teachers, lack of mastery of the content taught, inability of the learners to retain the prerequisites to the concepts, lack of time to teach, lack of sufficient learning materials, inadequate laboratory facilities, and difficulties in linking concepts from different grade levels. Responses included peer mentoring, teamwork, cooperative learning, independent learning, internet searching, activity adaptation, and localization of teaching materials. From the above discussion, it can be noted from the literature that the implementation of SPA by teachers is affected by the curriculum, teacher preparedness, student preparedness, resourcefulness, and context. Thus, further research is needed on teachers' personal experiences, their strategies for dealing with these situations, and curriculum implementation in different Philippine contexts.
Downloads
References
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Baron, J. V., & Dela Cruz, J. A. (2023). The spiral progression approach in teaching science: Its volatilities, uncertainties, complexities, and ambiguities (VUCA). Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 3(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v3i2.1194
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Calzado, J. M., & Abo, C. P. (2025). Spiral progression approach, digital literacy and competency of teachers: Basis for learning activity guides. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(6), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.261
Degorio, J. M. L. (2022). Teaching in the K–12 science spiral curriculum: An experiential approach. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2022.728a
Gonzales, N. J. (2019). Narrative experience of seasoned teachers in teaching science using spiral progression curriculum. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj403
Hernandez, L. L. (2021). Experiences of science teachers in implementing spiral approach. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(3), 866–870. https://ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT21MAR652.pdf
Jarap, M. G., & Puertos, J. (2026). Teaching context, professional support, and challenges of science teachers in the spiral progression approach. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 54(5), 658–676. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.540507
Linaugo, J. D. (2026). Navigating changes in the science curriculum: Teachers’ resilience and systemic gaps. Veredas do Direito, 23(4), e234642. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4642
Manzano, E. (2022). Experiences of science teachers under the spiral progression approach. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(7), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7317262
Mariano, K. R. M., & Mina-Roguel, S. S. (2025). Association of science teaching effectiveness in spiral progression approach and science teaching efficacy belief among science teachers. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 9(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v9i1.9322
Nahine, G., Nuñez, M., & Cabrezos, A. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and suggestions toward spiral progression of chemistry contents. International Journal of Science Academic Research, 5(1), 6942–6947. https://www.scienceijsar.com/article/teachers%E2%80%99-perceptions-experiences-and-suggestions-toward-spiral-progression-chemistry
Orbe, J. R., Espinosa, A. A., & Datukan, J. T. (2018). Teaching chemistry in a spiral progression approach: Lessons from science teachers in the Philippines. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n4.2
Perez, J. C. S., Bongcales, R. C. A., & Bellen, J. A. (2020). A scoping review on the implementation of the spiral progression approach. Journal of Academic Research, 1(1), 11–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343304741_A_Scoping_Review_on_the_Implementation_of_Spiral_Progression_Approach
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Resurreccion, G. A., Taala, W. D., & Adanza, J. R. (2016). Spiral progression approach in teaching science in selected private and public schools in Cavite. In Proceedings of the URUAE International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.17758/UR.UH0516148
Rosas, T. J. A. (2019). Lived experiences of junior high school specialized science teachers teaching science using the spiral progression approach. Journal of Education and Society, 3(1). https://journals.lnu.edu.ph/index.php/jes/article/view/26
Tirol, S. L. (2022). Spiral progression approach in the K to 12 science curriculum: A literature review. International Journal of Education, 10(4), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.5121/ije.2022.10403
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., . . . Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lovely M. Demandante, Lilibeth G. Abrogena, Jayferson G. Panilo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



