Personality Psychotype According to The A. Kapalbayeva Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v4i1.7125Keywords:
Emotional Regulation, Kapalbayeva Method, Karmic Growth, Personality psychotypes, Self-AwarenessAbstract
This paper is a complete exploration of a new paradigm of learning personality psychotypes A. Kapalbayeva Method which is a synthesis of spiritual philosophy and practical psychology. The study has used a mixed research design which involves both a qualitative thematic analysis of the principles underlying the method and a quantitative survey research of 170 participants aged between 18 and 65. The results show that there was an equal distribution of hard (50%) and soft (50%) psychotypes, with a significant difference in the intensity of emotional regulation (F(1, 168) = 6.82, p = 0.010), with the hard types having high intensity (mean = 3.48) and the soft types having high suppression (mean = 3.15). Age became one of the primary predictors of psychotype activation (p = 0.009, OR = 1.025), which is consistent with the developmental timeline of method, whereas family-related triggers occurred in 87% of participants, which is consistent with its karmic growth model. The fear of core and the opposite states were confirmed, i.e., The Pride was afraid of losing and becoming a victim, and 76% of people stated they were better aware of themselves after identification. Transformative potential of the method was observed in the practical results of 73% and 60% levels of the improvement of communication and relationships satisfaction, respectively. The context of the study situates these findings in the context of the existent personality typologies (e.g., Ennegram) and spiritual psychology, showing its original contribution to it by the theme of vibrational consciousness and empowerment of a creator. Irrespective of such shortcomings like self-report bias and cross-sectional nature, the study confirms the relevance of the methodology to the personal development and interpersonal processes. It is suggested to conduct future studies to cover the longitudinal impact, cultural differences, and physiological validation in order to support the empirical basis of the validity and expand its use in mental health and social harmony programs.
References
Awareness of Enneagram personality types and marital satisfaction among married couples in Kiambu County, Kenya. (2019). International Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 19–38. https://finessejournals.com/index.php/IJAHSS/article/view/11
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Mineka, S. (1994). Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.103
Edwards, A. C. (1991). Clipping the wings off the enneagram: A study in people’s perceptions of a ninefold personality typology. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 19(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1991.19.1.11
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 865–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00636.x
Estacio, R. D., & Angeles, H. G. V. (2025). Teaching efficacy and Enneagram personality types: A correlational study among pre-service early childhood educators in Quezon City University. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 6824–6831. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400497
Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2003). Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1975–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00045-X
Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. American Psychologist, 63(8), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3
Hoseinian, S., Azimipour, P., Karami, A., Yazdi, S. M., & Keshavarz Gerami, G. (2012). Study of the psychometrical features of Enneagram personality types. Journal of Career & Organizational Counseling, 4(12), 125–144.
Hur, Y., & Lee, K. H. (2011). Analysis of medical students’ Enneagram personality types, stress, and developmental level. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.3.175
Kapalbayeva, A. (2022). Personality psychotype according to the A. Kapalbayeva method [Unpublished manuscript].
MacDonald, D. A. (2000). Spirituality: Description, measurement, and relation to the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68(1), 153–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.t01-1-00094
Morales, S., Pérez-Edgar, K. E., & Buss, K. A. (2015). Attention biases towards and away from threat mark the relation between early dysregulated fear and the later emergence of social withdrawal. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(6), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9963-9
Moscovitch, D. A. (2009). What is the core fear in social phobia? A new model to facilitate individualized case conceptualization and treatment. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.04.002
Olatunji, B. O., Haidt, J., McKay, D., & David, B. (2008). Core, animal reminder, and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioral, physiological, and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1243–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.009
Oshio, A., Taku, K., Hirano, M., & Saeed, G. (2018). Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.048
Sloan, E., Hall, K., Moulding, R., Bryce, S., Mildred, H., & Staiger, P. K. (2017). Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 57, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.002
Wink, P., Ciciolla, L., Dillon, M., & Tracy, A. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and personality: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 75(5), 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00466.x
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Altynai Kapalbaeva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.