An Experimental Analysis of Empathy: Comparing Animal and Human Responses to Emotional Distress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v3i1.4391Keywords:
Animal, Emotional Distress, Empathy, HumanAbstract
This study seeks to elaborate on the emotional response of humans towards other humans and animals. In these circumstances, a video presentation has been utilized as the source of the specific details that will be used in an assessment to be answered by the participants. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the study, 20 college students were carefully selected. These participants were screened to exclude individuals with a history of traumatic experiences involving animals or humans, minimizing potential biases that could influence their emotional responses. A paired sample t-test was utilized since the researchers used a within-subject design. The p-value of 0.001 is below the threshold of 0.05. This signifies a statistically significant difference in empathy scores between the two groups, with participants exhibiting greater empathy towards animals than humans, as indicated by the positive t-statistic. Based on these findings, the null hypothesis was rejected, stating no difference in empathy scores between humans and animals.
References
Barklam, E. B., & Felisberti, F. M. (2024). The influence of pet owners’ empathy on perceptions of dog and cat distress vocalizations and caregiving behaviors. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1-15.
Cameron, C. D., Lengieza, M. L., Hadjiandreou, E., Swim, J. K., & Chiles, R. M. (2022). Empathic choices for animals versus humans: The role of choice context and perceived cost. The Journal of Social Psychology, 162(1), 161-177.
Cardoso, S. D., Faraco, C. B., de Sousa, L., & Pereira, G. D. G. (2022). Empathy with humans and with non-human animals: are there differences between individuals who have adopted and those who have relinquished a pet? Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 49, 46-52.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113.
Does, W. (2015). Measuring empathy: Collaborative assessment project (MECAP).
Faner, J. M. V., Dalangin, E. A. R., De Leon, L. A. T. C., Francisco, L. D., Sahagun, Y. O., & Acoba, E. F. (2024). Pet attachment and prosocial attitude toward humans: the mediating role of empathy to animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1391606.
Gamble, R. S., Henry, J. D., Decety, J., & Vanman, E. J. (2024). The role of external factors in affect-sharing and their neural bases. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105540.
Giacomin, M., Johnston, E. E., & Legge, E. L. (2023). Exploring narcissism and humanand animal-centered empathy in pet owners. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1087049.
Gómez-Leal, R., Costa, A., Megías-Robles, A., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Faria, L. (2021). Relationship between emotional intelligence and empathy towards humans and animals. PeerJ, 9, e11274.
Gu, X., Xie, L., & Bexell, S. M. (2024). The link between attitudes toward animals and empathy with humans in China: Mediation of empathy with animals. Anthrozoös, 37(1), 75-88.
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022). The complexity of the human–animal bond: Empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism in human–animal relationships and animal hoarding. Animals, 12(20), 2835.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hanah Bianca B. Dacillo, Sara G. Camacho, Danzel Dave V. Tamara, Claire Lynn B. Culajara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
