The Use of AI Tools in Writing Research Proposals: Perceptions, Practices, and Academic Implications Among Students

Authors

  • Marinel Vergara-Burgos Mindoro State University,Alcate, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines
  • John Edgar S. Anthony Mindoro State University,Alcate, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v5i2.7319

Keywords:

Academic Implications, AI Tools, Perceptions, Practices

Abstract

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic settings has transformed the way students approach research writing. This study investigates the types of AI tools commonly used by third-year BS Information Technology students at Mindoro State University (MinSU) in developing research proposals. It also explores their perceptions of AI-assisted writing, its influence on research quality and originality, and associated ethical implications. Employing an exploratory research design, in-depth interviews were conducted using a researcher-made guide covering four major objectives. Findings reveal that students frequently use AI-powered tools such as Grammarly, QuillBot, and ChatGPT for grammar correction, paraphrasing, and idea generation. Additionally, citation managers like Mendeley and Zotero, and plagiarism detection tools like Turnitin, are widely adopted. Students view AI tools as beneficial for enhancing writing efficiency, coherence, and content structure. However, concerns about over-reliance, loss of originality, fabricated sources, and ethical boundaries were also expressed. While AI tools support the research writing process, students stress the importance of human revision and critical thinking to ensure authenticity. The study highlights a significant variance in AI use based on individual writing skills, task complexity, and institutional policy clarity. It underscores the dual role of AI—as both a valuable academic aid and a potential threat to intellectual autonomy and academic integrity. The findings emphasize the need for clear institutional guidelines, AI literacy programs, and responsible integration strategies to promote ethical and effective use of AI in research writing across higher education institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychological Association. (2023). How to cite ChatGPT. APA Style Blog. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt

Bai, X., & Wang, D. (2023). Enhancing academic writing with AI writing tools: An exploratory study. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), 68–84.

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11134-6

Caballero, R. C., & Santiago, M. L. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in Philippine higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Philippine Journal of Educational Technology, 4(1), 45-60.

Cikrikci, Ö., & Griffiths, M. D. (2023). AI detection tools in higher education: Addressing plagiarism and academic integrity in the age of machine-generated content. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11547-y

Chiu, T. K. F., Chen, J., & Wang, T. (2023). Student perspectives on AI writing tools in academic settings: Opportunities and limitations. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100129

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Council. (2023). Position statement: Authorship and AI tools. COPE. https://publicationethics.org

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating? Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dahl, S., & Dalsgaard, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence and academic writing: A critical perspective on the use of AI in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 67-81.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., & Zaki, M. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102679

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28, 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

Ghosh, A., Patel, R., & Kim, H. (2023). AI-assisted academic writing: Benefits, risks, and ethical dilemmas. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 102374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102374

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2023). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals (AI and authorship guidance). http://www.icmje.org

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchenhoff, H., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Winkler, J. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education.Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). AI writing assistants in higher education: Students’ perceptions of Grammarly and implications for learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7493

Zou, D., Luo, S., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence–based writing assistants for academic writing: A scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13288

Kumar, R., Kumari, N., & Ahmed, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Addressing the writing challenges of ESL students. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10245–10265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10935-4

Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., & Churchill, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence and education: Reflections, opportunities, and challenges. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10041-8

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/about-pearson/innovation/open-ideas/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf

Martin, R., & Tang, R. (2020). Reference management software and citation practices: Tools for academic writing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 51(3), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.51.3.02

Salazar, J. P. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of AI: Perceptions and concerns among Filipino educators. Journal of Philippine Higher Education Research, 12(2), 89-105

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., ... & Nerini, F. F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Wang, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2023). Artificial intelligence in literature discovery: A bibliometric review of tools and applications. Scientometrics, 128, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04681-6

Yeo, S. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of AI: Balancing innovation and ethical use. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(1), Article 8. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol20/iss1/8

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Burgos, M. V., & Anthony, J. E. S. . (2026). The Use of AI Tools in Writing Research Proposals: Perceptions, Practices, and Academic Implications Among Students. American Journal of Education and Technology, 5(2), 70-75. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v5i2.7319

Similar Articles

1-10 of 141

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.