Supervision of Instruction: Teachers and School Heads’ Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i4.3862

Keywords:

Constraints in the Supervision of Instruction, Strategies

Abstract

The research focused on discovering the tactics used by school heads and the challenges faced when overseeing teaching in selected public secondary schools in Puerto Princesa City Division. The research utilized descriptive, correlation methods. The study included 139 participants, with 124 being teachers and 15 being school heads from the 15 public secondary schools in Puerto Princesa City Division. The researcher collected data from a survey questionnaire they created, the School Improvement Plan (SIP), The data was analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, weighted mean, ranking, Pearson-r correlation, and t-test methods. The results showed that the school heads’ supervisory strategies focused on enhancing instruction. They informed the teachers about the professional development opportunities that are available to them in certain areas. They frequently conducted their instructional supervision. The most popular functions were giving teachers feedback through performance assessment and evaluation that was constructive and accurate. The mentoring abilities of the school heads, along with the passive and uncooperative behavior of teachers, hindered their ability to supervise instruction effectively. The school heads’ instructional supervisory strategies were influenced by the frequency of instructional supervision provided to teachers, as they focused on developing, adopting, and implementing programs for instructional improvement, learning assessment, and teacher improvement. The research suggests that during mentorship sessions, school administrators should provide teachers with advice, specifically focusing on teaching techniques and the discovery and use of educational materials; Within the school improvement initiative, it is critical for school heads to establish or modify a program based on research. School administrators need to collaborate with expert teachers to evaluate and improve the curriculum in order to address the unique requirements of the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brookover, M., & Lezotte, R. (2019). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 1-12.

Hallinger, P. (2019). Developing instructional leadership terms in secondary schools: A framework. NASSP Bulletin, 73(517), 35-47.

Harris, M. (2019). Principals as agents? Investigating accountability in the compensation and performance of school principals. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 61(3), 45-62.

Heck, A. (2019). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 12-29.

Lashway, J. (2019). Empowering principal behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 123-145.

Leithwood, S. (2019, November 2). Learning communities for administrators. Educational Leadership. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/learning-communities-for-administrators

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2019). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles. Corwin Press.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2019). School leadership that works: From research to results. Sage Publications.

Stronge, J. M. (2018). Theory and practice of supervision. Dodd, Mead and Co.

Swearinger, M. E. (2019). Supervision of instruction: Foundations and dimensions. Allyn & Bacon.

Published

2024-11-25

How to Cite

Rizada, M. C. S. (2024). Supervision of Instruction: Teachers and School Heads’ Perspective. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(4), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i4.3862