Discussion-Based Approaches: Factors That Affect University Students’ Performance on Virtual Classroom Instruction

Authors

  • Kathy P. Maglalang Mindoro State University- Calapan City Campus, Philippines
  • Emelinda E. Rivera Mindoro State University- Calapan City Campus, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i2.1563

Keywords:

Virtual Classroom Instruction, Students’ Performance, CTE University Students

Abstract

This study examined the factors that affect the student’s performance in virtual classroom instruction and the student’s perception of virtual classroom instruction. The study used a descriptive research design to categorize the study variables, and it presents quantitative research that used internet surveys to collect data from respondents. The participants in the study were third-year BSED-English students enrolled in the second semester of the A.Y. 2020–2021 at the College of Teacher Education (CTE) of Mindoro State University, Philippines. 59 out of 90 student respondents participated in the survey in a span of three weeks, which covered 65% of the identified student respondents. The study used a researcher-made online survey questionnaire using Google forms with a close-ended statement. Results revealed that the support of the university and the support of instructors are great contributors to students’ performance in virtual classroom instruction. Meanwhile, regarding students’ perception of virtual classroom instruction, virtual classroom instruction does not meet students’ needs and learning styles and equips students’ knowledge, skills, and abilities, which affirms that students’ needs and learning styles are met when learning is face-to-face. It is necessary to provide a user-friendly Learning Management System (LMS) from a pedagogical perspective. Teachers must detect student needs and scaffold learning by closely observing student involvement and participation patterns to ensure they meet students’ needs and learning styles and equip their knowledge, skills, and abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, S., Hasan, N., & Aziz, N. (2020). Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college. Pak. Journal Medical Science 36(S4), S57-S61.https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2768

Ahmad, N., Yahaya, N., & Hassan, R. (2018). Relationship modeling of critical success factors for enhancing sustainability and performance in E-learning. Sustainability, 10(12), 4776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124776

Alipour, P. (2020). A Comparative Study of Online Vs. Blended Learning on Vocabulary Development Among Intermediate EFL Learners. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1857489

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group.

Alrefaie, Z., Hassanien, M., & Al-Hayani, A. (2020). Monitoring Online Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic; Suggested Online Learning Portfolio (COVID-19 OLP). MedEdPublish, 9, 110. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000110.1

Chirikov, I., Iannone, A., Stith, K., & Bunning, K. (2020). The role of faculty in reducing academic dishonesty among engineering students. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2464-2480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1569472

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255971

Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L.-E., Hall, J., & Ginns, P. (2018, May). Being able to adapt in the classroom improves teachers’ well-being. The Conversation, 5(21), 1-5. https://theconversation.com/being-able-to-adapt-in-the-classroom-improves-teachers-well-being-97679

Comer, D. R., Lenaghan, J. A., & Sengupta, K. (2015). Factors that affect students’ capacity to fulfill the role of the online learner. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 145-155.

Dibner K. A. (2020). Reopening k-12 schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Report from the national academies of Sciences, engineering, and Medicine. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 324, 833–834.

Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Černochová, M. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0172-1

Fullan, M. (2007). Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons.

García, E., & Weiss, E. (2020). COVID-19 and Student Performance, Equity, and U.S. Education Policy: Lessons from Pre-Pandemic Research to Inform Relief, Recovery, and Rebuilding. Economic Policy Institute.

Green, C., Burgos, D., & Hilera, J. R. (2020). Preparing education for the crises of tomorrow: A framework for adaptability. International Review of Education, 66(5), 857-879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09897-6

Harefa, S., & Sihombing, G. L. A. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning amidst the Covid-19 pandemic: A study of junior, senior high school and college students in a remote area. F1000Research, 10.

Heggart, K. (2015, February). Developing a growth mindset in teachers and staff. https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/developing-growth-mindset-teachers-and-staff

Horzum, M. B. (2018). Students’ perception of virtual classroom practices: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 1-18.

Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270-284.

Khalil, M., & Ebner, C. (2014). A brief literature review on online learning (e-learning): Challenges and advantages. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning, 744-752.

Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169-183.

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.

Lan M. & Hew K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using the mixed method. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 17, 1–24.

Lee, Q. & Im, Y. (2014). Innovation of higher education in the globalized era—emerging trends report 2013–2014. In R. H. Kinshuk & J. K. Price, (Eds..), ICT in education in the global context, 221–247. Berlin: Springer.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.004

Liu, F., & Cavanaugh, C. (2012). Factors influencing student academic performance in online high school algebra. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 27(2), 149-167.

Liu, Q. (2013). A study on the effectiveness of online learning in higher education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 540-546.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.

Melton, B., Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (2010). Language practice with multimedia-supported web-based grammar revision material. Recall, 22(3), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000115

Moisey, S. D., Neuhauser, C., & Hornik, J. (2008). Distance education technologies: Best practices for K-12 settings. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 151-175.

Mosca J.B. (2010). A Comprehensive Student-based Analysis of Hybrid Courses: Student Preferences and Design Criteria for Success. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 8, 7–21.

Oh, E. G. et al. (2020). Design review of MOOCs: application of E-learning design principles. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 455–475.

Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses

Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change, 219. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.

Vernadakis N, et al. (2011). Comparing hybrid learning with traditional approaches to learning the Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2003 program in tertiary education. Computers & Education. 188–199.

Ward, M. E., et al. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn, 11, 57–77.

Watson, J. F., & Kalmon, S. (2015). Online learning in postsecondary education: A review of the empirical literature (2011-2013). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(4), 275-299.

Yeboah, A. K., & Smith, P. (2016). Relationships between minority students online learning experiences and academic performance. Online Learning, 20(4), n4.

Yoon, S. A. (2017). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level online research course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 16(1), 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-09

How to Cite

Maglalang, K. P., & Rivera, E. E. (2023). Discussion-Based Approaches: Factors That Affect University Students’ Performance on Virtual Classroom Instruction . American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i2.1563