Sino-U.S. Strategic Competition in the Indo-Pacific: Is it Thucydides’ Trap?
Keywords:
Indo-Pacific, Rivalry, Strategic Competition, Thucydides TrapAbstract
This paper aims to analyze the Sino-U.S. rivalry and the possibility of hot conflict. The realist scholars analyzed the current paradigm through the lens of the realist perspective. The realist views it in the context of the U.S.-USSR, Cold War, and ‘Thucydides’ Trap. In contrast, the liberalist views it with the liberalist spectrum. Scholars view the current rivalry in the old theories, like the previous chronicles, such as the Thucydides trap and the Cold War. However, they may analyze the paradigm from new angles, with ground facts. Find the solution in between the realist and liberalist points of view. Strategic competition does not mean war and destruction; it implies that powers compete in geopolitics. The term Strategic Competition came into practice during the détente era, in the 1970s, when both powers i.e. the US and USSR were in a tough Cold War rivalry, but through negotiation, tension was reduced. The U.S-China are in strategic competition and they will reduce the rivalry and not go to war. China wants to gain superpower status without war, believing Sun Tzu’s philosophy ‘To win without fighting is better than winning with losses’. It’s normal in international relations that powers achieve their interest through military power, diplomacy, trade, and aid. Power, helps states to get tactical and bargaining leverage. China’s behavior and pattern show that China did not colonize foreign land, noninterference foreign policy, and did not influence its economic or political ideology on other governments. Hence, there is no possibility of Thucydides ’trap.
References
Azam, S. (2021). Dynamics of US-China rivalry and new warfare. https://shorturl.at/rghTY
Allison, G. (2017). The Thucydides trap. Foreign Policy, 9(6).
Ackerman, G., & Peterson, H. (2020). Terrorism and COVID-19. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(3), 59–73.
Ahmed, S. (1999). Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program: Turning points and nuclear choices. International Security, 23(4), 178–204.
Ali, M. (2009). US foreign aid to Pakistan and democracy: An overview. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 29(2), 247–258.
Ali, S. M. (2020). The US-China strategic rivalry and its implications for Pakistan. Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific Project.
Allison, G. (2018). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap?
Allison, G. T. (2017). Destined for war? The National Interest, (149), 9–21.
Arrighi, G. (2009). Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the twenty-first century. Verso Books.
Brewer, S. A. (2011). Why America fights: Patriotism and war propaganda from the Philippines to Iraq. Oxford University Press.
Callahan, W. A. (2009). China: The pessoptimist nation. OUP Oxford.
Carr, Q. (2024). Imperial arrogance: Spartan and the Corinthian War, 404–386 BCE. Military History Chronicles, 1(1).
Chen, G., Chen, J., Deng, X. C. X., Deng, Y., Kurlantzick, J., Pang, Z., & Zhu, Z. (2009). Soft power: China’s emerging strategy in international politics. Lexington Books.
Cornier, R. J. (2022). Strategic competition: A grounded theory study of China’s preferred form of warfare (Doctoral dissertation, National American University).
Demause, L. (2013). Is starting wars always self-destructive? Journal of Psychohistory, 40(3).
Deng, Y. (2021). How China builds the credibility of the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(131), 734–750.
DiCicco, J. M. (2017). Power transition theory and the essence of revisionism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151–1169.
Epstein, S. B., & Kronstadt, K. A. (2011). Pakistan: US foreign assistance (No. R41856). Congressional Research Service.
Friedland, R., & Boden, D. (Eds.). (1994). NowHere: Space, time, and modernity. University of California Press.
Garlick, J., & Havlová, R. (2020). China’s “Belt and Road” economic diplomacy in the Persian Gulf: Strategic hedging amidst Saudi–Iranian regional rivalry. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 49(1), 82–105.
Gertz, B. (2000). The China threat: How the People’s Republic targets America. Regnery Publishing.
Ghosh, P. (2020). International relations. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Glaser, B. S. (2014). US-China relations: Managing differences remains an urgent challenge.
Grosz, E. (2020). The nick of time: Politics, evolution and the untimely. Routledge.
Harvey, D. (1990). Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3), 418–434.
Heiduk, F., & Wacker, G. (2020). From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Significance, implementation, and challenges.
Hillman, J. (2022). China’s entry into the WTO: Mistake by the United States? In Forthcoming chapter in China and the WTO.
Hout, T. M., & Ghemawat, P. (2010). China vs the world. Harvard Business Review, 88(12), 94–103.
Huang, Y. (2021). The US-China trade war has become a Cold War.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2005). Power and liberal order: America’s postwar world order in transition. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 5(2), 133–152.
Kaldor, M. (2013). New and old wars: Organised violence in a global era. John Wiley & Sons.
Kaplan, R. D. (2005). How we would fight China. The Atlantic, 295(5), 49–64.
Kelso, J. S. (2000). Principles of dynamic pattern formation and change for a science of human behavior. In Developmental science and the holistic approach (pp. 73–94). Routledge.
Köllner, P., Patman, R. G., & Kiglics, B. (2021). From Asia–Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Diplomacy in an emerging strategic space. In From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Diplomacy in a contested region (pp. 1–27). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Krepinevich Jr, A. F. (2001). Military experimentation: Time to get serious. Naval War College Review, 54(1), 76–89.
Langlois, C. C., & Langlois, J. P. P. (1996). Rationality in international relations: A game-theoretic and empirical study of the US-China case. World Politics, 48(3), 358–390.
Larsen, K. (2024). The competition for the Indo-Pacific: The United States, China, and their competition for influence through multilateralism within the Indo-Pacific region.
Lee, J. (2019). Did Thucydides believe in Thucydides’ trap? The history of the Peloponnesian War and its relevance to US-China relations. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24(1), 67–86.
Liebig, M. (2014). Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra: A classic text of statecraft and an untapped political science resource. Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics, (74).
Lippert, B., Perthes, V., & SWP-Deutsches, S. W. (2020). Strategic rivalry between United States and China: Causes, trajectories, and implications for Europe.
Low, K. C. P., & Teo, T. C. (2014). Some Chinese war strategies: Applying its key lessons to strategic leadership. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(12), 91–99.
Mahapatra, C. (2011). India-China-Pakistan triangle: The US factor. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 6(4), 407–421.
Malik, M. (2016). Balancing act: The China-India-US triangle. World Affairs, 179(1), 46–57.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2007). Structural realism. In International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (pp. 77–94).
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50.
Muthayya, S., Sugimoto, J. D., Montgomery, S., & Maberly, G. F. (2014). An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1324(1), 7–14.
Naarajärvi, T. (2018). A superpower in the making: China’s path to global influence. Finland, FIIA.
Nye, J. S. (2023). Cold war with China is avoidable. In Soft power and great-power competition: Shifting sands in the balance of power between the United States and China (pp. 177–179). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Palmore, J. (2003). US ballistic missile defense and China. Defense & Security Analysis, 19(4), 369–375.
Parikh, A., & Kureshi, B. (2024). The necklace of diamonds & string of pearls: The duo counter-reactive game that deems over the world. GLS KALP: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(3), 1–14.
Perot, E. (2021). The AUKUS agreement: What repercussions for the European Union? European Issues, (608), 28.
Pierson, P. (2000). Not just what, but when: Timing and sequence in political processes. Studies in American Political Development, 14(1), 72–92.
Qiao-Franco, G., & Zhu, R. (2022). China’s artificial intelligence ethics: Policy development in an emergent community of practice. Journal of Contemporary China, 1–17.
Radzinsky, B. (2021). The strategic implications of the evolving US-China nuclear balance. The Washington Quarterly, 44(4), 163–182.
Saeed, M. (2017). From the Asia-Pacific to the Indo-Pacific: Expanding Sino-US strategic competition. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 3(04), 499–512.
San, T. K. (2014). Dynastic China: An elementary history. The Other Press.
Sayler, H. M. (2019). Hypersonic weapons: Background and issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Shafqat, D. S., & Shahid, S. (2020). Changing dynamics of China-India relations: CPEC and prospects for Pakistan.
Shi, X., & Yao, L. (2019). Prospect of China’s energy investment in Southeast Asia under the Belt and Road Initiative: A sense of ownership perspective. Energy Strategy Reviews, 25, 56–64.
Singh, S. (2021). The challenge of a two-front war. Stimson Center.
Stone, R. W. (2011). Controlling institutions: International organizations and the global economy. Cambridge University Press.
Sullivan, J. J. (2014). Hobbes and his contemporaries. In A handbook to the reception of Thucydides (pp. 239–260).
Supyan, V. B. (2020). President Trump’s foreign economic reforms: Preliminary results. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 90, 653–660.
Talone, A. J. (2019). How the United States can reinforce India as a counterbalance to China in the Indian Ocean region from a military standpoint (Doctoral dissertation, Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Command and General Staff College).
The US-China conflict and the role of Pakistan: The view of realists and liberalist scholars and philosophers. (Ghosh, P. 2020). International Relations. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Thompson, W. R. (2001). Identifying rivals and rivalries in world politics. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 557–586.
Tierney, D. (2021). The future of Sino-US proxy war. Spring 2021.
Trump, D. J. (2017). National security strategy of the United States of America. US Government Printing Office.
U.S. State Government. (2024). The United States’ enduring commitment to the Indo-Pacific: Marking two years since the release of the administration’s Indo-Pacific strategy.
Wang, F. L. (2005). Preservation, prosperity, and power: What motivates China’s foreign policy? Journal of Contemporary China, 14(45), 669–694.
Weimar, N. D. (2013). Sino-Indian power preponderance in maritime Asia: A (re-)source of conflict in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. Global Change, Peace & Security, 25(1), 5–26.
Winkler, S. C. (2023). Strategic competition and US-China relations: A conceptual analysis. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(3), 333–356.
Xia, G. (2014). China as a “civilization-state”: A historical and comparative interpretation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 43–47.
Zhang, W. W. (2012). The China wave: Rise of a civilizational state. World Scientific.
Zhao, S. (2014). A neo-colonialist predator or development partner? China’s engagement and rebalance in Africa. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(90), 1033–1052.
Zongyi, L. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative and the US “Indo-Pacific” strategy. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 18(2), 1–147.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Saleem T. M Azam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
