A Review on the Great Game in Afghanistan: A Realist Perspective on the Geopolitical Struggle for Control

Authors

  • Imranullah Akhtar Professional Development Center, Law & Political Science, Alfalah University, Nangarhar, Afghanistan
  • Nazifullah Niazi Quality Assurance Department, Alfalah University, Jalalabad, Afghanistan

Keywords:

Great Game, Geopolitics, Self-Interests, Power Politics, Realism

Abstract

This review aims to analyze the Great Game in Afghanistan from a realist perspective, focusing on the geopolitical struggle for control among major powers. The study delves into historical events and power dynamics to comprehend the motivations and actions of key actors. The Great Game in Afghanistan refers to the historical rivalry and strategic competition between great powers for regional influence and control. This review adopts a realist perspective, which asserts that states act primarily in their own self-interest and pursue power and security in international relations. The methods employed include historical analysis and comparative analysis, providing comprehensive information on the Great Game in Afghanistan and examining key events, diplomatic maneuvers, and power dynamics. The results shed light on the motivations and actions of key actors, highlighting the enduring nature of the Great Game. The Great Game in Afghanistan, involving great powers like the British Empire, the Soviet Union, and the US, has led to instability and hindered Afghanistan’s development as a sovereign nation. The conclusion underscores the significance of power politics in shaping Afghanistan’s trajectory, and the Great Game in Afghanistan highlights the persistent power dynamics in international relations, driven by geopolitical considerations and self-interest, resulting in conflicts and instability. The recommendation emphasizes the need for a nuanced and pragmatic approach to managing the country’s geopolitical dynamics. The Great Game’s historical context calls for a pragmatic approach to managing Afghanistan’s geopolitical struggles, prioritizing regional cooperation, inclusive diplomacy, and economic development for stability and progress.

References

Abid, A. (2023). The Great Game of 19th Century: The Significance of Tribal Belt as Buffer to the Buffer State of Afghanistan. Global social sciences review, https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-i).09

Afridi, A. A. (2023). The Great Game of 19th Century: The Significance of Tribal Belt as Buffer to the Buffer State of Afghanistan. Global Social Sciences Review, VIII.

Ahmed, A. S. (1981). Afghanistan: the great game revisited—a review article. The Journal of Asian Studies, 41(1), 73-80.

Amantaev, I. A. Z. (2014). Afghanistan, Great Britain, and Russia during “The Great Game”.

Azadany, A. H. (2016). How Would a Realist Explain the Civil War in Afghanistan?. European Scientific Journal, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.19044/ESJ.2016.V12N8P401

Bearden, M. (2001). Afghanistan, graveyard of empires. Foreign Aff., 80, 17.

Berkowitz, B. (2007). The Great Game and the endgame in Afghanistan.

Bhat, Ali. (2020). Great Game in Central Asia: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Social Sciences, 16, 125-133. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2020.125.133. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343973188_Great_Game_in_Central_Asia_Causes_and_Consequences

Burke, J. (2015). The great game. 25. 44-45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297564230_The_great_game

Eventon, Ross. (2011). Russia, Afghanistan and the Great Game. NOREF Article. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/138659/7%20oct.pdf

Fraser, T. (2018). Great Game in Asia. 10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324925753_Great_Game_in_Asia

Huband, Mark. (2019). Great Game, Dirty Game. 10.4324/9780429495847-4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334350376_Great_Game_Dirty_Game

Husain, Farrukh. (2018). Afghanistan In The Age of Empires: The Great Game for South and Central Asia. First ed. UK: Silk Road Books.

Idil, T.. (2013). Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia. The International Journal of Turkish Studies,

Jalali, A. A. (2017). The Great Game and the British Invasion of Afghanistan: 1809–1839. In A Military History of Afghanistan: From the Great Game to the Global War on Terror (pp. 79–116). University Press of Kansas. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1p6qpc3.8

Khalilzad, Z. (1996). Afghanistan in 1995: Civil War and a Mini-Great Game. Asian Survey, 36(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645816

Leslie, J. (2021). Second Afghan War Casualties. 10.1093/Nq/Clxv.oct07.247-B. Https://Www.researchgate.net/Publication/31423440_second_afghan_war_casualties

McLachlan, K. (1997). Afghanistan: The geopolitics of a buffer state. Geopolitics, 2(1), 82-96.

McLean, K. (2017). Kabul, Afghanistan, 1962: The New Great Game. In Crossing the River Kabul: An Afghan Family Odyssey (pp. 64–65). University of Nebraska Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p6jhvp.22

Peter, Gilbert. (2012). Afghanistan – the “great game” without end?. The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, https://doi.org/10.1108/17479881211230673

Reilly, D. A. (2003). The power politics game: offensive realism in theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming, 34(2), 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878103252889

Rubin, B. R., & Rashid, A. (2008). From Great Game to Grand Bargain: Ending Chaos in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Foreign Affairs, 87(6), 30–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20699370

Sareen, Sushant. (2021). Afghanistan: The endgame and the new great game. {Online} Available at: https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/afghanistan-the-endgame-and-the-new-great-game/(Accessed 10-11-2021)

Scott, D. (2008). The great power ‘great game’between India and China:‘The logic of geography’. Geopolitics, 13(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040701783243

Walberg, E. (2011). Postmodern imperialism: Geopolitics and the great games. SCB Distributors.

Published

2024-08-10

How to Cite

Akhtar, I., & Niazi, N. (2024). A Review on the Great Game in Afghanistan: A Realist Perspective on the Geopolitical Struggle for Control. Journal of International Relations and Peace, 1(1), 15–22. Retrieved from https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/jirp/article/view/2723