Capturing Moments and Flavors: A Student-market Feasibility Study of a Photobooth with Edible Props and Takeaway Treats

Authors

  • Michael Joshua D. Aban Department of Business and Innovation, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
  • Jezza Mae S. Balatayo Department of Business and Innovation, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
  • Hakim D. Camama Department of Business and Innovation, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
  • Daniella Grace E. Marzo Department of Business and Innovation, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
  • Mary Joy R. Ratilla Department of Business and Innovation, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines
  • Jupert Jasser G. Abellana Department of Business and Innovation, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsde.v5i2.7942

Keywords:

Edible Props, Event Entertainment, Experiential Marketing, Iligan City, Photobooth Service, UAI Study

Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility of an edible-prop photobooth service as an innovative event entertainment concept in Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology. Using a quantitative-descriptive design, data were gathered from 300 respondents, predominantly students aged 18 to 21 from Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology, through purposive sampling via online and face-to-face survey distribution. The instrument was based on the Usage, Attitude, and Image (UAI) framework, supplemented by the Theory of Planned Behavior and Experiential Marketing Theory. Findings revealed a strong level of customer interest, with 88.6% of respondents expressing willingness to engage with edible props during photo sessions, and 94.6% agreeing that the concept would enhance event entertainment as the highest combined positive response across all measured items. The concept was also perceived as highly unique (92.3%) and memorable (93.0%), supporting its differentiation from traditional photobooth  services. While 92.6% of respondents indicated willingness to try the service, price sensitivity was notable: 54.3% preferred a price point of ₱145.00 and nearly 80% indicated a ceiling of ₱160.00, underscoring the importance of cost-conscious pricing in a student-dominated market. Primary concerns centered on hygiene and food safety (257 respondents), cleanliness and mess management (238), and product cost (192). Cotton candy and lollipops emerged as the most preferred edible props due to their visual appeal, photogenic qualities, and low-mess characteristics—advantages that also reduce operational complexity. Overall, the study suggests that student consumers show a generally positive reception to the concept. However, sustaining operations will depend on implementing strong food safety practices, offering menu options that consider common allergens, and maintaining a pricing strategy within the ₱145–₱160 range. As an initial feasibility study focused on the student market, the findings are based on expressed preferences and intended behaviors rather than actual purchasing data. Therefore, conclusions regarding market viability should be interpreted with caution. Despite these limitations, the study provides an empirical basis for future research on hybrid eatertainment services, particularly within Philippine provincial event markets, which remain underrepresented in existing experiential marketing literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, J. A. R. (2025). Capturing the millennial market: Key factors influencing customer acquisition in Pasig City’s traditional Spanish fine dining restaurants. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 4(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v4i2.4924

Bacay, E., Castro, A. A. G., Tandoc, E. M., Tablanza, S. D., & Oates, M. B. (2025). Influence of spend rewards and vouchers: Assessing consumer behavior towards paying more to get discounts. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v4i2.4950

Carmo, M., Marques, C., & Dias, Á. (2022). Experiential marketing and customer satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Promotion Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2054903

Fajar, M., Udjaja, Y., Purwanto, E. S., & Anderies. (2021). RTR AR photo booth: The real-time rendering augmented reality photo booth. In 2021 1st International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence (ICCSAI) (pp. 289–294). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSAI53272.2021.9609795

Fernandes, J. V., & Krolikowska, E. (2022). The festival customer experience: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 14(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-11-2021-0083

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

Jiang, Y., Lyu, C., & Hu, Y. (2025). Foodstagramming by Generation Z customers: The role of psychological ownership. Anatolia, 36(1), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2024.2320688

Kim, J., Choi, H., Hu, M., & Chern, M. (2020). Customer participation and value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 109, 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.007

Kim, J., Lee, C., & Jung, T. (2020). Exploring consumer behavior in experiential services. Sustainability, 12(10), 1–15.

Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2015). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant (Expanded ed.). Harvard Business Review Press.

Napitupulu, S. A., & Rr. Erlina. (2024). Business analysis of automatic photobooth business at Slay the Box using Business Model Canvas in Bandar Lampung City. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 3(05), 1014–1025. https://tinyurl.com/ysu36228

Ong, A. K. S., Tacardon, E. R., & Gumasing, M. J. J. (2025). An extended theory of planned behavior approach for assessing factors affecting street food consumption in the Philippines. Food Quality and Preference, 123, 105344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105344

Philp, M., Jacobson, J., & Pancer, E. (2022). Predicting social media engagement with computer vision: An examination of food marketing on Instagram. Journal of Business Research, 149, 736–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.078

Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (2019). The experience economy. Harvard Business Review Press.

Rahman, K. (2025). Integrating consumer behavior theories: Understanding modern consumer decision-making. In Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Proceedings, 15. https://doi.org/10.20429/amtp.2025.07

Singh, P., & Singh, V. (2024). The power of AI: Enhancing customer loyalty through satisfaction and efficiency. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2326107

Vegas Dyce, M., Marcella-Hood, M., & Pirie, E. (2024). Pic first, eat later: An investigation into motivations behind the foodstagramming phenomenon. Hospitality & Society, 14(3), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1386/hosp_00086_1

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

How to Cite

Aban, M. J. D. ., Balatayo, J. M. S. ., Camama, H. D. ., Marzo, D. G. E. ., Ratilla, M. J. R. ., & Abellana, J. J. G. . (2026). Capturing Moments and Flavors: A Student-market Feasibility Study of a Photobooth with Edible Props and Takeaway Treats. American Journal of Social Development and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsde.v5i2.7942

Similar Articles

1-10 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.