Science Teachers’ Experiences with the Spiral Progression Approach in the Philippines: A Scoping Review

Authors

  • Lovely M. Demandante Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines
  • Lilibeth G. Abrogena Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines
  • Jayferson G. Panilo Mariano Marcos State University, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i5.8600

Keywords:

Philippine Science Education, Science Teachers, Spiral Progression Approach, Teachers’ Experience

Abstract

The Spiral Progression Approach (SPA) has been introduced into the science education curriculum in the Philippines for purposes of ensuring continuity, integration, and progressive learning of science concepts by students across different grade levels. However, the literature regarding the experiences of science teachers in implementing this approach is scattered across many areas. This scoping review was carried out in order to identify and consolidate all the available evidence regarding the experiences of science teachers in the implementation of the SPA in the Philippine context. This study used the scoping review methodology framework established by Arksey and O’Malley (2005), supported by JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting frameworks. Ten (10) studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The results indicated that the experiences of the teachers were both positive and challenging at the same time. SPA was seen to be advantageous in fostering continuity of learning, concept reinforcement, engagement of the learners, and wider exposure to different fields of science. However, the persistent difficulties faced included teaching outside the specialization of the teachers, lack of mastery of the content taught, inability of the learners to retain the prerequisites to the concepts, lack of time to teach, lack of sufficient learning materials, inadequate laboratory facilities, and difficulties in linking concepts from different grade levels. Responses included peer mentoring, teamwork, cooperative learning, independent learning, internet searching, activity adaptation, and localization of teaching materials. From the above discussion, it can be noted from the literature that the implementation of SPA by teachers is affected by the curriculum, teacher preparedness, student preparedness, resourcefulness, and context. Thus, further research is needed on teachers' personal experiences, their strategies for dealing with these situations, and curriculum implementation in different Philippine contexts. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Baron, J. V., & Dela Cruz, J. A. (2023). The spiral progression approach in teaching science: Its volatilities, uncertainties, complexities, and ambiguities (VUCA). Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 3(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v3i2.1194

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

Calzado, J. M., & Abo, C. P. (2025). Spiral progression approach, digital literacy and competency of teachers: Basis for learning activity guides. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(6), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.261

Degorio, J. M. L. (2022). Teaching in the K–12 science spiral curriculum: An experiential approach. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2022.728a

Gonzales, N. J. (2019). Narrative experience of seasoned teachers in teaching science using spiral progression curriculum. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj403

Hernandez, L. L. (2021). Experiences of science teachers in implementing spiral approach. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(3), 866–870. https://ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT21MAR652.pdf

Jarap, M. G., & Puertos, J. (2026). Teaching context, professional support, and challenges of science teachers in the spiral progression approach. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 54(5), 658–676. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.540507

Linaugo, J. D. (2026). Navigating changes in the science curriculum: Teachers’ resilience and systemic gaps. Veredas do Direito, 23(4), e234642. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v23.n4.4642

Manzano, E. (2022). Experiences of science teachers under the spiral progression approach. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(7), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7317262

Mariano, K. R. M., & Mina-Roguel, S. S. (2025). Association of science teaching effectiveness in spiral progression approach and science teaching efficacy belief among science teachers. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 9(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v9i1.9322

Nahine, G., Nuñez, M., & Cabrezos, A. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and suggestions toward spiral progression of chemistry contents. International Journal of Science Academic Research, 5(1), 6942–6947. https://www.scienceijsar.com/article/teachers%E2%80%99-perceptions-experiences-and-suggestions-toward-spiral-progression-chemistry

Orbe, J. R., Espinosa, A. A., & Datukan, J. T. (2018). Teaching chemistry in a spiral progression approach: Lessons from science teachers in the Philippines. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n4.2

Perez, J. C. S., Bongcales, R. C. A., & Bellen, J. A. (2020). A scoping review on the implementation of the spiral progression approach. Journal of Academic Research, 1(1), 11–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343304741_A_Scoping_Review_on_the_Implementation_of_Spiral_Progression_Approach

Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

Resurreccion, G. A., Taala, W. D., & Adanza, J. R. (2016). Spiral progression approach in teaching science in selected private and public schools in Cavite. In Proceedings of the URUAE International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.17758/UR.UH0516148

Rosas, T. J. A. (2019). Lived experiences of junior high school specialized science teachers teaching science using the spiral progression approach. Journal of Education and Society, 3(1). https://journals.lnu.edu.ph/index.php/jes/article/view/26

Tirol, S. L. (2022). Spiral progression approach in the K to 12 science curriculum: A literature review. International Journal of Education, 10(4), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.5121/ije.2022.10403

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., . . . Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

How to Cite

Demandante, L. M. ., Abrogena, L. G. ., & Panilo, J. G. . (2026). Science Teachers’ Experiences with the Spiral Progression Approach in the Philippines: A Scoping Review. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation , 5(5), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i5.8600

Similar Articles

91-100 of 238

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.