Comparing Writing Speed and Quantity with Sign Pens and Ballpoint Pens: An Experimental Analysis

Authors

  • Chris Shantana Siton University of Mindanao Digos College, Philippines
  • Shaenly Christell Bao University of Mindanao Digos College, Philippines
  • Angel Micah Rejas University of Mindanao Digos College, Philippines
  • Bea Athena Cabang University of Mindanao Digos College, Philippines
  • Claire Lynn B. Culajara University of Mindanao Digos College, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v3i1.4190

Keywords:

Ballpoint Pen, Quantity, Sign Pen, Speed, Writing

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of sign pens and ballpoint pens on writing performance, with a focus on writing speed and quantity. Participants of the study were 20 college students who took part in a within-subject experiment, rewriting a 587-word story under controlled conditions with both pen types. Writing speed was assessed in words per minute, and the total quantity of words was recorded as well. Statistical tools, such as paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank test in which results show for speed of writing is that sign pens significantly outperformed the ballpoint pen (p = 0.004, d = 0.740) as well as for the quantity of writing which also revealed great amount of effect (p = 0.020, d = 1.00). Both writing speed and quantity revealed significant difference when using sign pens than ballpoint pens. These finding are beneficial for students, educators, and pen makers, highlighting the significance of ergonomic and effective pen designs in academic fields. Future studies should look into additional variables including grip comfort, hand fatigue, and writing clarity to better understand the function of writing tools in academic performance.

References

Cristobal, J. (2022). Test construction principles violated in selected summative tests in English. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 1(2), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v1i2.317

Graham, S. (2021). A walk through the landscape of writing: Insights from a program of writing research. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1951734

Handley, M. A., Lyles, C. R., McCulloch, C., & Cattamanchi, A. (2018). Selecting and improving quasi-experimental designs in effectiveness and implementation research. Annual Review of Public Health, 39(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014128

Hase, A. (2022). Evaluation of writing performance for different types of ballpoint pen ink by acoustic emission sensing. Lubricants, 10(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants10030044

Lee, J., Murad, S., & Nikolov, A. (2023). Ballpoint/rollerball pens: Writing performance and evaluation. Colloids and Interfaces, 7(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids7020029

Lin, Y.-C., Hsu, C.-H., Lin, C.-F., Hsu, H.-Y., Liu, J.-W., Yeh, C.-H., & Kuo, L.-C. (2022). Pen-grip kinetics in children with and without handwriting difficulties. PLOS ONE, 17(6), e0270466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270466

Linc_Seo. (2024). Ball pens: Grip comfort, ink color, and writing style. Linc. https://linclimited.com/blog/ball-pens-grip-comfort-ink-color-and-writing-style/?utm_source=chatgpt.com&fbclid=IwY2xjawHVrXZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHbu1PYVD-bVPmqsQ12AEWzHu7TQZCHUZUQ4xqxCNWFrOC59ikE4fxL3qKw_aem_XQC4hHUle95uHURj0nWlbw

Micunovic, I. (2020, September 24). The art of Chinese calligraphy. Meer. https://www.meer.com/en/63496-the-art-of-chinese-calligraphy

Mokhetsengoane, S. J., & Pallai, P. (2023). Effective teaching in the 21st century: Investigating barriers and solutions from one university in Assam, India. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 2(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v2i1.1390

Moore, C., & Buzzini, P. (2020). A review on porous-tipped writing instruments: Current market trends, properties, and analytical methodologies. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. https://journal.asqde.org/articles/267?_rsc=khg8o

Ni, Y., He, N., Lü, Y., Zou, N., Song, H., Li, H., & Zhao, P. (2020). Study of ink aging: Targeting triethylene glycol in carbon-based black gel ink strokes on paper. Forensic Science International, 311, 110296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110296

Warrior, P. (2023). Speed writing essentials: Choosing the perfect pen (2024). Pen Vibe. https://penvibe.com/speed-writing-essentials-choosing-the-perfect-pen/

Warrior, P. (2023). The best 3 pens for fast handwriting. Pen Vibe. https://penvibe.com/the-best-3-pens-for-fast-handwriting/

Reynolds. (2024). The best gel pen for smooth, fast, and smudge-free writing. Reynolds. https://www.reynolds-pens.com/blogs/the-best-choice-for-smooth-fast-and-smudge-free-writing-reynolds-racer-gel/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3b7hGy9ISNghAx2pt7u9CvEGSJi5aLu5jerSHs4akvUH8bH4kn8iXw46Y_aem_x9x4u7HClvoxkEMlf5vRQw

Sharif, M., Batool, M., Chand, S., Farooqi, Z. H., Tirmazi, S. A. A. S., & Athar, M. (2019). Forensic discrimination potential of blue, black, green, and red colored fountain pen inks commercially used in Pakistan, by UV/visible spectroscopy, thin layer chromatography, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5980967

Simply Psychology. (2023). Within-subjects design: Examples, pros & cons. https://www.simplypsychology.org/within-subjects-design.html

Statistics Solutions. (2024). Paired sample t-test. Statistics Solutions. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/free-resources/directory-of-statistical-analyses/paired-sample-t-test

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Siton, C. S., Bao, S. C., Rejas, A. M., Cabang, B. A., & Culajara, C. L. B. (2025). Comparing Writing Speed and Quantity with Sign Pens and Ballpoint Pens: An Experimental Analysis. American Journal of Human Psychology, 3(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v3i1.4190