Two Worlds, One Classroom: Reciprocal Learning Between Digital Native Students and Digital Immigrant Professors in Moroccan EFL Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i2.1522Keywords:
Digital Immigrants, Digital Natives, EFL Education, Reciprocal Learning, Technology IntegrationAbstract
The gap between digital natives and digital immigrants continues to widen as technology evolves, a divide particularly evident in higher education where digital immigrant professors and digital native students interact despite differing teaching and learning preferences. While prior research has examined technology integration in education, little is known about how EFL students and professors in Moroccan higher education perceive this integration and the reciprocal learning opportunities it creates. This study therefore investigated professors’ perceptions of technology integration, the challenges they face, and what digital native students and digital immigrant professors can learn from one another. An exploratory mixed-methods design was used, involving 206 EFL students and 19 EFL professors from Moulay Ismail University, Morocco, who completed an online questionnaire with closed- and open-ended items. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative responses through thematic analysis. Findings showed that despite challenges such as content overload, misinformation, distraction, and technical issues, both students and professors held positive perceptions of technology integration in EFL education. Results further indicated that digital native students can help professors develop technological skills and navigate digital tools, while digital immigrant professors can help students strengthen information evaluation skills, use traditional learning resources, adapt when technology fails, and value interpersonal communication. These findings underscore the importance of fostering reciprocal learning and collaborative professional development to enhance technology integration in higher education. However, the study was limited to a single university and relied on self-reported data; future research should include multiple institutions, larger samples, and longitudinal or experimental designs.
Downloads
References
Arabac, I. B., & Polat, M. (2013). Dijital yerliler, dijital gocmenler ve sinif yonetimi. Elektronik Sysyal Bilimler, 12(47), 11–20.
Barbuceanu, C. D. (2020). Teaching the digital natives. Revista De Științe Politice, 65, 136–145.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Bilgic, H. G., Dogan, D., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2016). Digital natives in online learning environments: New bottle old wine – the design of online learning environments for today’s generation. Handbook of Research on Engaging Digital Natives in Higher Education Settings, 192–221. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0039-1.ch009
Branscombe, A., Goswami, D., Schwartz, J., Bowen, B. (1992). Students teaching/Teachers learning. Heinemann.
Cimen, B., & Hangul, S. (2021). Digital immigrant teachers’ perceptions about digital native students: An investigation into turkish school context. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 14(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v14i2.1576
Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gallardo-Echenique, E., Marques-Molas, L., Bullen, M., & Strijbos, J. (2015). Let’s talk about digital learners in the digital era. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 156–187.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Meridian. Wiley, New York.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
GU, X., ZHU, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the “Digital natives”: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 392–402.
Guo, R., Dobson, T., & Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: An analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.a
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2011). Adults learning online: Digital choice and/or digital exclusion? New Media & Society, 13(4), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810374789
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2003). Millennials go to college. American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.
Ktoridou, D., & Eteokleous-Grigoriou, N. (2011). Developing digital immigrants’ computer literacy: The case of unemployed women. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(3), 154–163.
Mete, R., Riegel, C., Kozen, & Polka, W. (2017). What every contemporary teacher educator needs to know about technology. . .but, didn’t know about who to ask! The Journal of the Illinois Association of Teacher Educators, 26, 41–55.
National Research Council (1999). Being fluent with information technology. National Academy Press, Washington.
Papert, S., & Resnick, M. (1995). Technological fluency and the representation of knowledge: Proposal to the national science foundation. MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge.
Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education in the post covid-19 era: Students’ perception and learning experience. Education Sciences, 11(10), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100633
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945.
Riegel, C., & Mete, R. (2017). Educational technologies for K-12 learners: What digital natives and digital immigrants can teach one another. Educational Planning, 24(4), 49–58.
Sharma, M. (2017). Teacher in a digital era. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: G Interdisciplinary, 17(3), 10–14.
Tapscott, D. (1998). Educating the Net generation. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 6–11.
The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. (2011). 5th International Conference on Electronic Government, 28(1), 3–10.
Valek, J., & Sladek, P. (2012). Immersed into digital world: Learning and students’ perception. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1866–1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.139
Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2021). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3
Vodanovich, S., Sundaram, D., & Myers, M. (2010). Research commentary: Digital natives and ubiquitous information systems. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 711–723.
Wang, E., Myers, M., & Sundaram, D. (2012). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Towards a model of digital fluency. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 409–419.
Wang, Q., Myers, M., & Sundaram, D. (2013). Digital natives and digital immigrants towards a model of digital fluency. The European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0390-2
Zur, O. (2011). On digital immigrants and digital natives: How the digital divide affects families, educational institutions and the workplace. Zur Institute: Innovative Resources and Online Continuing Education, 1–13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Haytham Elaoufy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
