The Role of Performance Budgeting in Developing Management Control in Universities: Evidence from Morocco

Authors

  • Khaoula Belhassan Ibn Tofail University, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v2i3.2133

Keywords:

Higher Education, Management Control, New Public Management, Performance, Results Based Budgeting

Abstract

Under the combined effect of performance budget reforms and reforms of the higher education sector, universities face a set of constraints but also opportunities. More than ever, they are called upon to engage in strategic thinking and to set up performance reporting mechanisms that promote a new governance style called “the entrepreneurial university”. Management control is the most suitable tool for ensuring consistency of actions towards the objectives pursued. In this paper, we tried to shed light on the role of budgetary reforms in the development of management control in universities. for this we have chosen to conduct a case study which will make it possible to detect the relationship between the performance budgeting devices and the development of management control in Moroccan universities. Results shows that results based budgeting has an important role on the development of management control in universities. Nevertheless, management control practices remain in an embryonic state and should be improved by university’s responsible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belhassan, K., & Azegagh, J. (2020). New Public Management reforms in developing countries: the Moroccan case. International Journal of Business and Technology Studies and Research, 2(3), 50-59.

Brookes, M., & Becket, N. (2007). Quality management in higher education: A review of international issues and practice. International Journal of Quality Standards, 1(1), 85-121.

Bouquin, H., & Pesqueux, Y. (1999). Vingt ans de contrôle de gestion ou le passage d’une technique à une discipline. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 5(3), 93-105.

Middlehurst, R., & Elton, L. (1992). Leadership and management in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 17(3), 251-264.

Lynch, K. (2015). Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 190-207.

Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: is the local dimension still important?. Comparative education, 37(1), 7-20.

Dollado, R. J. (2022). Management Strategies and Practices of In-House Development and Outsourcing of Information Systems in Higher Education Institutions - A Case in Samar, Philippines. American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology, 6(1), 34–41.

Kenny, J. (2008). Efficiency and effectiveness in higher education: Who is accountable for what?. Australian Universities’ Review, The, 50(1), 11-19.

Eggrickx, A. (2012). Réflexion critique sur l’adoption d’outils de gestion par mimétisme: le cas de la LOLF. Management Avenir, (4), 61-82.

Hofstede, G. (1981). Management control of public and not-for-profit activities. Accounting, Organizations and society, 6(3), 193-211.

Janka, M., Heinicke, X., & Guenther, T. W. (2020). Beyond the “good” and “evil” of stability values in organizational culture for managerial innovation: the crucial role of management controls. Review of Managerial Science, 14, 1363-1404.

Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management accounting research, 19(4), 287-300.

Martin-Sardesai, A. (2016). Institutional entrepreneurship and management control systems. Pacific Accounting Review, 28(4), 458-470.

Simons, R. (2019). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives. In Management Control Theory (pp. 173-194). Routledge.

Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business horizons, 59(3), 311-320.

Ozdil, E., & Hoque, Z. (2017). Budgetary change at a university: A narrative inquiry. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 316-328.

Pratolo, S., Sofyani, H., & Anwar, M. (2020). Performance-based budgeting implementation in higher education institutions: Determinants and impact on quality. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1786315.

Raffinot, M., & Samuel, B. (2006). Les cadres de dépenses à moyen terme: un instrument utile pour les pays à faible revenu?. Statéco, 100, 105-120.

Schick, A. (1966). The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform. Public Administration Review, 26(4), 243–258.

Sterck, M., & Scheers, B. (2006). Trends in performance budgeting in seven OECD countries. Public performance & management review, 30(1), 47-72.

Tamer, H., & Knidiri, Z. (2023). University 4.0: Digital Transformation of Higher Education Evolution and Stakes in Morocco. American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions, 2(1), 20-28.

Vale, J., Amaral, J., Abrantes, L., Leal, C., & Silva, R. (2022). Management accounting and control in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 14.

Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. In Applications of case study research. SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-16

How to Cite

Belhassan, K. (2023). The Role of Performance Budgeting in Developing Management Control in Universities: Evidence from Morocco. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 2(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v2i3.2133