Legal Pluralism, Cultural Governance, and the Postcolonial Politics of Food Heritage and Folklore in Bangladeshi Statehood

Authors

  • Md Habibur Rahman Department of Folklore and Social Development Studies, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi – 6205, Bangladesh
  • Istiaque Bin Islam Department of Food and Nutritional Science, Rajshahi Institute of Biosciences, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Md. Mobashir Rahman Department of Folklore and Social Development Studies, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi – 6205, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajds.v3i2.5969

Keywords:

Cultural Governance, Folklore, Food Heritage, Legal Pluralism, Postcolonial Statehood

Abstract

Food habits in the marginalized communities of Bangladesh are closely related to culture, eco-knowledge, and spiritual faith; e.g., Santal, Chakma, Bengali Hindu community, and the Rohingya. However, such systems are now in conflict with State laws, particularly the Food Safety Act of 2013, which sets the standards of public health that disregard culturally necessary modalities, fermentation, cooking in clay pots, and foraging. The present study adopts a qualitative approach in the form of semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and policy actor interviews among the four communities. The analysis was conducted with NVivo coding and an inductive analysis approach and identified the recurrent themes of food sovereignty, cultural survival, and legal pluralism. Findings demonstrate that traditional practices are quite critical in keeping culture and tradition, but they are frequently lost in the quest by the government to standardize and promote health. Indicatively, open-fire cooking and fermentation, which form the backbone of the foodways of these people, are deemed as unsafe by the existing rules, which could impose change or even secrecy. These obstacles made participants emphasize their ability and determination to defend their heritage and continue lobbying to achieve food sovereignty and culturally relevant policies. The paper indicates that the introduction of a standardized set of rules that could be used in all agroecologies could be unsuitable, as there is a great range of food systems that are dominant in Bangladesh. To fill this gap, an idea of safety with heritage is provided in the paper to expand the process-oriented safety standards to protect the food without removing the cultural practice. It is a non-discriminatory and nutritious model of food governance that aims at protecting the health of both the population and the marginalized group, and that aims at preserving and participating in their food culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appadurai, A. (1988). How to make a national cuisine: Cookbooks in contemporary India. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 30(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500015024

Barton, K. (2014). Protecting traditional food knowledge through geographical indications. International Journal of Food Policy, 16(3), 45–60.

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2022). General principles of food hygiene (CXC 1-1969) (Rev. 2020/2022). FAO/WHO. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius

Finkler, K. (2018). Food sovereignty, food justice, and indigenous food systems. Food Security, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0759-9

Herzfeld, M. (2016). Cultural intimacy: Social poetics and the real life of states, societies, and institutions (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734394

Kikon, D. (2021). Bamboo shoot in our blood: Fermenting flavors and identities in Northeast India. Current Anthropology, 62(S24), S376–S387. https://doi.org/10.1086/713934

McMichael, P. (2009). Food sovereignty, social reproduction, and the agrarian question. In Food sovereignty: A critical dialogue. Yale University.

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638

Nyeleni Forum. (2007). Declaration of the Forum for Food Sovereignty (Nyéléni, Mali). https://nyeleni.org

Patel, R. (2009). Food sovereignty: The challenge to the global food system. In Food sovereignty: A critical dialogue. Yale University.

Rahman, M. H., Rahman, M. M., & Islam, I. B. (n.d.). Indigenous organic agriculture theory: A modern farming system based on folklore and sustainability in the 21st century.

Sutton, D. E. (2001). Remembrance of repasts: An anthropology of food and memory. Berg.von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2002). The dynamics of legal pluralism in South Asia. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 34(46), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2002.10756563

Rahman, M. H., & Rahman, M. M. (2025). Folklore as intellectual property: Policy, legal prospects, and the urgency of developing a national folklore register for Bangladesh. Legal Prospects, and the Urgency of Developing a National Folklore Register for Bangladesh (August 01, 2025). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5383087

Rahman, M. H., Rahman, M. M., & Khan, I. A. (2025). Indigenous water symbolism and management: A comparative study on ecologies of rain and intellectual appropriation in Bangladesh, India, the US, and Germany. HISTORICAL: Journal of History and Social Sciences, 4(3), 339-361. https://doi.org/10.58355/historical.v4i3.202

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Rahman, M. H., Islam, I. B., & Rahman, M. M. (2025). Legal Pluralism, Cultural Governance, and the Postcolonial Politics of Food Heritage and Folklore in Bangladeshi Statehood. American Journal of Development Studies, 3(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajds.v3i2.5969