Nano-Adsorptive Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium [Cr(VI)] Using CamelliaSinensis–Derived Biochar–Melamine Nanocomposites

Authors

  • Eisha Tur Radia Soil and Environmental Sciences, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Uzair Department of Biological Sciences, Virtual University of Pakistan, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan
  • Ahmed Yar Department of Chemical Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Sohaib Usman Department of Biosciences, Comsats University Islamabad Sahiwal campus, Pakistan
  • Muzammil Anjum Soil and Environmental Sciences, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajbb.v5i1.7173

Keywords:

Biosorption, Cr(VI) Removal, Hexavalent Chromium, Melamine, Potassium Dichromate, Tea Leaf Adsorbent, UV–Visible Spectrophotometry, Wastewater Treatment

Abstract

Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] is a highly toxic and carcinogenic contaminant commonly found in industrial wastewater. The development of sustainable, low-cost biosorbents for its removal is critical for effective environmental remediation. Conventional chromium removal technologies are often expensive and generate secondary pollutants. Therefore, the synthesis of efficient, biomass-derived adsorbents represents a promising alternative for wastewater treatment applications. A nitrogen-enriched carbonaceous biosorbent was synthesized via pyrolytic carbonization of a 1:1 (w/w) mixture of spent tea leaf powder and melamine at 500 °C for 2 h. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted by varying adsorbent dosage (0.25–1.5 g), initial Cr(VI) concentration (10–100 mg L⁻¹), and contact time (24–48 h). Residual Cr(VI) concentrations were determined using UV–Visible spectrophotometry at 400 nm. Adsorption efficiency increased with higher adsorbent dosage and longer contact time, while decreasing with increasing initial chromium concentration. The maximum removal efficiency of 92.5% was achieved at 1.5 g dosage and 10 mg L⁻¹ Cr(VI) after 48 h. The enhanced performance is attributed to nitrogen functionalization and the porous carbon matrix formed during carbonization. The tea leaf–melamine-derived composite demonstrates high efficiency for Cr(VI) removal and offers a cost-effective, sustainable solution for chromium-contaminated wastewater treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babel, S., & Kurniawan, T. A. (2003). Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 97(1–3), 219–243.

Baral, A., & Engelken, R. D. (2002). Chromium-based regulations and greening in metal finishing industries in the US. Environmental Science & Policy, 5(2), 121–133.

Costa, M., & Klein, C. B. (2006). Toxicity and carcinogenicity of chromium compounds in humans. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 36(2), 155–163.

Crini, G., & Badot, P. M. (2008). Application of chitosan, a natural aminopolysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions. Progress in Polymer Science, 33(4), 399–447.

Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011). Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 407–418.

Gupta, S. S., & Nayak, A. (2012). Adsorption of heavy metals from wastewater using low-cost adsorbents: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 19(5), 1826–1845.

International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1990). Chromium, nickel and welding (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 49). IARC.

Jeyakumar, R., & Chandrasekaran, M. (2014). Bioremediation of hexavalent chromium in contaminated soil by Pseudomonas spp. Journal of Environmental Biology, 35(5), 881–888.

Katz, S. A., & Salem, H. (1994). The toxicology of chromium with respect to its chemical speciation. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 13(3), 217–224.

Kotas, J., & Stasicka, Z. (2000). Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation. Environmental Pollution, 107(3), 263–283.

Li, X., Tang, Y., Cao, X., Lu, D., Luo, F., & Shao, W. (2010). Preparation and evaluation of orange peel cellulose adsorbents for treatment of heavy metal wastewater. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22(8), 1273–1280.

Miretzky, P., & Cirelli, A. F. (2010). Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 180(1–3), 1–19.

Park, D., Yun, Y. S., & Park, J. M. (2005). Reduction of hexavalent chromium with the brown seaweed Ecklonia biomass. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(7), 2290–2293.

Richard, F. C., & Bourg, A. C. (1991). Aqueous geochemistry of chromium: A review. Water Research, 25(7), 807–816.

Saha, R., & Orvig, C. (2010). Biosorbents for hexavalent chromium elimination from industrial and municipal effluents. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 254(23–24), 2959–2972.

Sharma, D. C., & Forster, C. F. (1993). Removal of hexavalent chromium using sphagnum moss peat. Water Research, 27(7), 1201–1208.

Sud, D., Mahajan, G., & Kaur, M. P. (2008). Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions: A review. Bioresource Technology, 99(14), 6017–6027.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25

How to Cite

Radia, E. T. ., Uzair, M. ., Yar, A. ., Usman, S. ., & Anjum, M. . (2026). Nano-Adsorptive Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium [Cr(VI)] Using CamelliaSinensis–Derived Biochar–Melamine Nanocomposites. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajbb.v5i1.7173

Similar Articles

1-10 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.