E-VAT Adoption and VAT Revenue Performance in South Asia: Evidence from Bangladesh

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajase.v5i2.8286

Keywords:

BEVAF, Digital Tax Administration, E-Governance, E-VAT, Revenue Mobilization, SME, South Asia, TAM, VAT Compliance Bangladesh

Abstract

Electronic Value Added Tax (E-VAT) schemes play an important role in the process of tax administration modernization in South Asia but have vastly varying revenue effects in countries that have broadly similar tax policy goals. The objective of this study is to elaborate maturity of E-VAT system, performance of the VAT/GST revenue in six selected South Asian economies (S.A.E.) particularly in Bangladesh, taxpayer’s behavior and challenges of implementing E-VAT system in selected S.A.E. It features a sequential explanatory mixed methods design that consists of secondary country-year data for fiscal years 2019-2024 and 25 semi-structured interviews with 5 NBR officials, 10 VAT consultants and 10 VAT-registered SME taxpayers. Due to the small panel sample (n = 25), this exploratory OLS regression analysis is not meant to uncover exact causal relationships. Although the rate of the standard VAT rate in Bangladesh is 15%, and the E-VAT platform has been operational since 2019, Bangladesh has a low VAT-to-GDP ratio of about 3.6%, compared to Nepal (5.3%) and India (6-7%) and the Maldives (approximately 12%). Furthermore, interview evidence showed there are institutional and operational issues in the real-life implementation of the e-invoice tool, including: Different revenue databases exist; The portal cannot always be relied upon when a large volume of e-invoicing occurs; There are low levels of taxpayer training; Taxpayer grievance mechanisms are weak; and E-invoicing is not mandatory. The study proposes the “Bangladesh E-VAT Adoption Framework (BEVAF)” which is an attempt to relate the institutional enablers with technology platform maturity, behavioral compliance results from an institutional perspective. The results validate a plan for the staged implementation of a reform program, touching on the following aspects: e-invoicing, database integration, assistance for taxpayers, audit risk scoring, mobile access to invoices, and penalty procedures reform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, E., & Best, M. (2012). Financing social policy in the presence of informality (Asia Research Centre Working Paper). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://www.lse.ac.uk/asiaResearchCentre

Alabede, J. O., Ariffin, Z., & Idris, K. M. (2011). Individual taxpayers’ attitude and compliance behavior in Nigeria: The moderating role of financial condition and risk preference. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3(5), 91–104.

Asare, J., Akwasi Nkyi, J., Owusu Afriyie, S., & Amoakohene, G. (2025). Realities of digital technology adoption impacts on the financial sectors of developing economies. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 4(3), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v4i3.4721

Bird, R. M., & Gendron, P. P. (2007). The VAT in developing and transitional countries. Cambridge University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. (2023). Notification No. 10/2023-Central Tax: E-invoicing threshold from 1 August 2023. Government of India. https://einvoice1.gst.gov.in/Others/Notifications

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. (2024). GST collection data and annual report 2023–24. Government of India. https://www.cbic.gov.in

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Ebrill, L., Keen, M., Bodin, J. P., & Summers, V. (2001). The modern VAT. International Monetary Fund.

Fjeldstad, O. H., & Moore, M. (2008). Tax reform and state-building in a globalised world. In D. Brautigam, O. H. Fjeldstad, & M. Moore (Eds.), Taxation and state-building in developing countries: Capacity and consent (pp. 235–260). Cambridge University Press.

GST Council, Government of India. (2024). GST revenue statistics and e-invoicing materials. https://gstcouncil.gov.in

Gupta, A. S. (2007). Determinants of tax revenue efforts in developing countries (IMF Working Paper No. 07/184). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451867480.001

Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-governance for development (i-Government Working Paper Series, No. 11). Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester. https://www.gdi.manchester.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper-archive/igov/

Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? (i-Government Working Paper Series, No. 14). Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3540058

International Monetary Fund. (2024). Pakistan: 2024 Article IV consultation and request for an arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility (IMF Country Report No. 24/324). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org

International Monetary Fund. (2024). Sri Lanka: 2024 Article IV consultation and second review under the Extended Fund Facility (IMF Country Report No. 24/161). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400279478.002

Keen, M. (2013). The anatomy of the VAT (IMF Working Paper No. 13/111). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484330586.001

Keen, M., & Lockwood, B. (2010). The value added tax: Its causes and consequences. Journal of Development Economics, 92(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.012

Kochanova, A., Hasnain, Z., & Larson, B. (2020). Does e-government improve government capacity? Evidence from tax compliance costs, tax revenue, and public procurement competitiveness. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx024

Loo, E. C., Evans, C., & McKerchar, M. (2010). Challenges in understanding compliance behavior of taxpayers in Malaysia. Asian-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 16(1), 1–10.

Maldives Inland Revenue Authority. (2023). Annual report 2023. https://www.mira.gov.mv

Minh Le, T., Moreno-Dodson, B., & Bayraktar, N. (2012). Tax capacity and tax effort: Extended cross-country analysis from 1994 to 2009 (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6252). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6252

Ministry of Finance, Bangladesh. (2024). Bangladesh economic review 2023–24. Finance Division, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. https://mof.gov.bd

Ministry of Finance, Economic Stabilization and National Policies, Sri Lanka. (2025). Budget, economic and fiscal position report. https://www.treasury.gov.lk

Mpofu, F. Y., & Moloi, T. (2022). Direct digital taxes and electronic tax administration in developing and emerging countries: Perceived challenges. Risks, 10(9), Article 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10090183

National Board of Revenue, Bangladesh. (2024). Annual report and VAT statistical materials. Government of Bangladesh. https://nbr.gov.bd

Nkwe, N. (2013). Taxpayers’ attitude and compliance behavior among small and medium enterprises in Botswana. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(7), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2013.37071

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Tax Administration 3.0 and electronic invoicing: Initial findings. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2ffc88ed-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Tax administration 2024: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5ea3ef3b-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Revenue statistics in Asia and the Pacific 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6c04402f-en

Okunogbe, O., & Tourek, G. (2024). How can lower-income countries collect more taxes? The role of technology, tax agents, and politics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.38.1.81

Peru, J. (2025). Tax compliance as a driver of sustainability: Modeling for medium enterprises. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 4(5), 74–88. https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ajmri/article/view/5602

Slemrod, J., & Gillitzer, C. (2014). Tax systems. MIT Press.

TADAT Secretariat. (2019). TADAT field guide. Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool. https://www.tadat.org/en/resources/field-guide.html

World Bank. (2025). South Asia development update, April 2025: Taxing times. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org

World Bank. (2025). World development indicators [Database]. World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Islam, M. S. . (2026). E-VAT Adoption and VAT Revenue Performance in South Asia: Evidence from Bangladesh. American Journal of Applied Statistics and Economics, 5(2), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajase.v5i2.8286

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.