Ordinary Least Square, the cornerstone of Econometric Theory; A literature Inquiry

Authors

  • Okeowo Idowu Adeniyi Department of Economics, Caleb University, Imota, Lagos, Nigeria
  • Japinye Abayomi Oluwaseun Banking Supervision Department, Central Bank of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajase.v5i1.6473

Keywords:

Econometrics, Model Selection, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Regression Analysis

Abstract

The widespread application of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is increasingly challenged by assumption violations, numerical instability, and inefficiencies in complex data structures. This  review systematically explores the historical evolution, strengths, limitations, and modern adaptations of OLS in contemporary econometric practice. Following a structured scoping review methodology, this study synthesises literature on OLS and its alternatives. The review identifies key themes, including the historical development of OLS, its theoretical foundations, empirical strengths and weaknesses, and emerging econometric techniques that address its limitations. Thematic coding and a comparative analysis of alternative estimation methods are applied to critically assess the role of OLS in modern econometrics. The findings highlight that while OLS remains a robust estimation technique under classical assumptions, it faces significant challenges in practical applications. Studies indicate that OLS is particularly limited in handling multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, endogeneity, and non-linear relationships. Alternative methods such as Generalized Least Squares (GLS), Instrumental Variables (IV), Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), Ridge Regression, and machine learning-based techniques provide improved estimation in scenarios where OLS fails. The review further identifies an ongoing methodological shift where OLS is increasingly integrated with modern econometric techniques rather than being used in isolation. OLS continues to serve as a fundamental econometric tool, particularly in well-behaved datasets. However, its role is evolving as researchers incorporate robust statistical techniques to mitigate its limitations. Future research should focus on the empirical trade-offs between OLS and modern alternatives, the integration of OLS with machine learning approaches, and the ethical implications of model selection in econometric analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Japinye Abayomi Oluwaseun, Banking Supervision Department, Central Bank of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria

    Bank Examiner

References

Abdullahi, I. & Yahaya, A. (2015) Analysis of quantile regression as alternative to ordinary least squares. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijasp.v3i2.4686

Aldrich, J. (1998). Doing Least Squares: perspectives from Gauss and Yule. International Statistical Review, 66, 61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403657

Anderson, C. & Schumacker, R. E. (2003) A Comparison of five robust regression methods with ordinary least squares regression: relative efficiency, bias, and test of the null hypothesis. Understanding Statistics, 2, 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328031us0202_01

Balzer, W. & Haendler, E. W. (1989). Ordinary Least Squares as a method of measurement. Philosophy of Economics, 30, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/20012202

Banerji, J. (2011). The method of (not so) ordinary least squares: what can go wrong and how to fix them. Contemporary Physics, 52, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2011.563544

Bell, J. (2015). Ordinary Least Squares Revolutionized: establishing the vital missing empirically determined statistical prediction variance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2573840

Chan, M. L. & Oksanen, E. H. (1987). Ordinary Least Squares versus Principal Components Regression: some simulation evidence. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01972332

Chipman, J. S. (2011). Gauss-Markov theorem. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 577–582

Cox, J. C & Oaxaca, R. L. (2008). The use of market experiments to evaluate the performance of econometric estimators. Handbook of experimental economics results, 1078–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00114-x

Deligonul, Z. S., Chabowski, B. R. & Seggie, S. H. (2009). Methodological rigor of Ordinary Least Squares Regression studies in mainstream marketing. Journal of Marketing, 20, 389–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-7979(2009)0000020017

Dempster, A. P., Schatzoff, M. & Wermuth, N. (1977). A simulation study of alternatives to ordinary least squares. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 77–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286909

Flom, P. L. (2015). Alternative methods of regression when ols is not right. SAS Global Forum

Freedman, D. A. (2025). Limits of econometrics. International Econometric Review (IER), 1, 5–17. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/238780

French, M. T. & Popovici, I. (2011). That Instrument is lousy! in Search of agreement when using instrumental variables estimation in substance use research. Health Economics, 20, 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1572

Greene, W. H. (1981). On the asymptotic bias of the ordinary least squares estimator of the tobit model. Econometrica, 49, 505. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913323

Hallin, M. (2014). Gauss-Markov theorem in statistics. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07536

Hansen, B. E. (2022). A Modern Gauss–Markov theorem. Econometrica 90, 1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.2307/48681194

Harefa, A. O., Zega, Y. & Mendrofa, R. N. (2023). The application of the Least Squares method to multicollinear data. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies, 11, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijmss.13/vol11n13039

Helmreich, J. E.& Krog, K. P. (2017). Ordinary Least Squares and Quantile Regression: an inquiry-based learning approach to a comparison of regression methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1296911

Horrace, W. C. & Oaxaca, R. L. (2006). Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model. Economics Letters, 90, 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.08.024

Hu, X. (2023). Using Ordinary Least Squares in Higher Education Research: A Primer. Higher education, 29, 1–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32186-3_13-1

Hübner, N., Wagner, W., Zitzmann, S. & Nagengast, B. (2023). How strong is the evidence for a causal reciprocal effect? Contrasting traditional and new methods to investigate the reciprocal effects model of self-concept and achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09724-6

Inder BA (1987). Bias in the Ordinary Least Squares estimator in the dynamic linear regression model with autocorrelated disturbances. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918708812619

Islamov, B., Turdibaeva, M. & Yusupov, A. S. (2022). Methodological issues of econometric estimating export gravity models. ICFNDS ’22: The 6th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584202.3584244

Ito, M., Noda, A. & Wada, T. (2022). An alternative estimation method for time-varying parameter models. Econometrics, 10, 23–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics10020023

Karafiath, I. (2007). Is there a viable alternative to ordinary least squares regression when security abnormal returns are the dependent variable? https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0079-y

Kline, T. B. & Klammer, J. D. (2001). Path model analyzed with ordinary least squares multiple regression versus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603692

Krämer, W. & Hassler, U. (1998). Limiting efficiency of OLS vs. GLS when regressors are fractionally integrated. Economics Letters, 60, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(98)00126-8

Mahaboob, B., Venkateswarlu, B. & Narayana, C. (2018). A treatise on ordinary least squares estimation of parameters of linear model. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.10.21216

Merriman, M. (1877). On the history of the method of least squares. https://doi.org/10.2307/2635472

Mukhopadhyay, P. & Schwabe, R. (1998). On the performance of the ordinary least squares method under an error component model. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02742874

Nalewaik, J. J. (2008). Lack of signal error (lose) and implications for OLS regression: measurement error for macro data. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2008.15

Okeowo, I A. (2020). Macroeconomic modeling of investment, unemployment and inflation rate. Samuel Adegboyega University Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 100-108.

Okeowo, I A., Adewale, A. S. & Onodingene, H., (2025). Rethinking African in the Global Development Agenda: Pathway to Economic Transformation. Sinergi International Journal of Economics, 3(3), 156-169

Okeowo, I A., Japinye, O. A. (2025). Determinants of output growth volatility in Nigeria. Sinergi International Journal of Economics, 3(3), 132-142

Okeowo, I A., Japinye, O. A. and Segun, A. A. (2025). Maternal mortality in Nigeria and implications for economic development. American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation, 4(3), 168-177.

Okeowo, I A., Onodingene, H., Gilbert I. and Nwokoma, N, A. A. (2025). Casless policy and monetary policy conduct in Nigeria. Innovation, 82, 737-746.

Okeowo, I. A. (2019). Modeling inequality adjustment in West Africa sub region for sustainable development: application of autoregressive distributed lag technique. Samuel Adegboyega University Journal of Management and Social Science, 4(1&2), 121-129.

Okeowo, I. A. (2020). The impact of economic growth on inequality; empirical application of Gini-coefficient. International Journal of Media, Security and Development, 6(1&2), 146-151.

Okeowo, I. A. (2023). Industrialisation and industrial output nexus in Nigeria: a new empirical evidence. Journal of Economics and Allied Research, 8(3), 123-130.

Okeowo, I. A. (2023). Unemployment and inflation trade-off; the Nigerian experience in the context of Philip curve. Journal of Economics and Allied Research, 8(2), 109-119.

Okeowo, I. A. (2024). Classic theory of development, a review of literature. DS Reviews of Commerce and Economics, 1(1), 44-49.

Okeowo, I. A. and Awotade, J. A. (2024). Money supply, exchange rate and output growth volatility in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Allied Research, 9(2), 27-32.

Okeowo, I. A. and Ozekhome, H. (2020). Price level, economic growth and macroeconomic performance in Nigeria: A granger causality modeling and ARDL approach. International Journal of Economic Development, 13(2), 191-221.

Okeowo, I. A., Gilbert, I., Oni, O., Adewale, S. A., Bakare, A. and Sadiq, J. M. (2023). The Effect of Inflation Rate, Exchange Rate, Oil Price and Wage Rate Structure on Nigeria economy. Journal of Economics and Policy Analysis, 8(1), 71-90.

Okeowo, I. A., Oladoke, S. O., Abu, Z., Isaac, O. O. and Adenika, O. A. (2024). Investigation of inflation and wage dynamics in Nigeria: new empirical insights. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and accounting, 24(11), 297-306.

Ouattara, A., Bulte, M. & Lin, W. J. (2021). Scalable econometrics on big data - the logistic regression on spark. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2106.10341

Ozekhome, H A., Esan, B. A. and Okeowo, I. A. (2023). Monetary policy and credit 2023).intermediation nexus in Nigeria: further evidence. African Development Finance Journal, 5(5), 101-117.

Ozekhome, H A., Okeowo, I. A. and Adesokan, A. J. (2024). External-induced shock of COVID-19 pandemic on stock market volatility in African countries. Journal of Applied Financial Econometrics, 5(2), 201-215.

Ozekhome, H A., Okeowo, I. A. and Adesokan, A. J. (2024). External-induced shock of COVID-19 pandemic on stock market volatility in African countries. Journal of Applied Financial Econometrics, 5(2), 201-215.

Ozekhome, O. H. and Okeowo, I. A. and (2022). Do economic and institutional policies matter for sustained economic growth for an oil-dependent Nigerian economy in recession? International Journal of Economic Development, 15(2), 93-121.

Peel, M. J., Goode, M. H. & Moutinho, L. A. (1998). Estimating consumer satisfaction: OLS versus ordered probability models. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047369

Phillips, P. C. (2003). Laws and Limits of Econometrics. The Economic Journal, 113, C26–C52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00114

Plackett, R. L. (1972). Studies in the history of probability and statistics. XXIX: The Discovery of the Method of Least Squares. Biometrika 59, 239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334569

Sapra, S. K. (1998). Bias and inefficiency of an ordinary least squares estimator for logit regressions with continuous dependent variables measured with error. Applied Economics Letters, 5, 745–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048598353925

Shaffer, J. P. (1991). The Gauss-Markov theorem and Random Regressors. The American Statistician 45, 269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684451

Sheynin, O. (2014). Gauss and the method of least squares. https://doi.org/10.15611/sps.2014.12.01

Stigler, S. M. (1981). Gauss and the invention of least squares. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345451

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E. & Zarin, W. (2018). Prisma extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Vinod, H. D. (1978). A Survey of ridge regression and related techniques for improvements over ordinary least squares. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924340

Watson, P. K. (1983). Kalman filtering as an alternative to Ordinary Least Squares: some theoretical considerations and empirical results. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01973191

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press

Appendix I: Combined Search Query

(“Ordinary Least Squares” OR “OLS regression” OR “Least Squares Method” OR “linear regression estimat*” OR “OLS model” OR “OLS estimat*”)

AND

((“historical development” OR “histor*” OR “evolution” OR “origin*” OR “Gauss” OR “Legendre” OR “statistical origin*” OR “early application*” OR “develop* of OLS”)

OR

(“limitation*” OR “bias*” OR “weakness*” OR “criticism*” OR “pitfall*” OR “assumption* fail*” OR “multicollinear*” OR “heteroscedastic*” OR “endogen*” OR “overfit*” OR “mis-specification*” OR “OLS inefficien*”)

OR

(“application*” OR “use case*” OR “applied econometric*” OR “real-world implement*” OR “economic model*ing” OR “economic model*ling” OR “policy evaluat*” OR “forecast*” OR “time-series analys*” OR “market analys*” OR “financial econometric*” OR “panel data analys*”)

OR

(“alternative method*” OR “Generalized Least Squares” OR “Generalised Least Squares” OR “GLS regression” OR “Instrumental Variable*” OR “IV regression” OR “Maximum Likelihood Estimat*” OR “MLE” OR “Bayesian regression” OR “Machine learning regression” OR “Ridge regression” OR “Lasso regression” OR “Quantile regression” OR “Regulari?ed regression” OR “Robust regression” OR “Nonparametric method*”))

AND

(“econometric model*ing” OR “econometric model*ling” OR “statistical infer*” OR “regression analys*” OR “prediction model*” OR “econometric estimation technique*” OR “statistical estimat*” OR “linear model*”)

Downloads

Published

2026-03-18

How to Cite

Adeniyi, O. I. ., & Oluwaseun, J. A. . (2026). Ordinary Least Square, the cornerstone of Econometric Theory; A literature Inquiry. American Journal of Applied Statistics and Economics, 5(1), 56-88. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajase.v5i1.6473

Similar Articles

1-10 of 45

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.