The Micro-Sociology of the Classroom: Group Boundaries, Collective Aggression, and Pedagogical Agency in Student Mobbing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v5i4.8666

Keywords:

Classroom Mobbing, Collective Aggression, Micro-Sociology, Multimodality, Pedagogical Agency, Peer Exclusion

Abstract

Student mobbing is examined in this conceptual article as a collective and relational classroom process rather than as a simple accumulation of individual bullying incidents. Drawing on micro-sociology, social semiotics, peer-group research, and scholarship on classroom interaction, the article develops the Classroom Mobbing Multimodal Framework (CMMF). The framework addresses a gap between approaches that explain bullying primarily through individual perpetrator–victim relations and approaches that recognise peer-group processes without systematically integrating the multimodal resources through which exclusion is enacted. CMMF conceptualises collective exclusion through four interconnected dimensions: linguistic, embodied, spatial, and digital. Its analytical premise is that no isolated sign constitutes evidence of mobbing; rather, meaning emerges through recurrence, coordination, sequence, and context. The article also positions pedagogical agency as relational and situated. Teachers are not expected to monitor students continuously or to infer harmful intent from subtle behaviour. Instead, CMMF is proposed as a heuristic for professional reflection, contextual interpretation, documentation, dialogue, and modification of classroom conditions. An illustrative vignette and coding example demonstrate how the four dimensions could be operationalised in future empirical research. The framework is not a validated diagnostic instrument and the article reports no empirical testing. Its contribution is therefore theoretical and methodological: it provides a structured proposition for examining how collective exclusion may emerge across interactional, group, and pedagogical levels and identifies directions for future qualitative, multimodal, and mixed-methods validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Georgios Potamias, PhD Pedagogy, School Principal, Greece

    I am a PhD educational researcher and experienced educator working at the intersection of multimodality, multimodal literacy, artificial intelligence and educational innovation.
    My research focuses on how multimodal approaches can transform teaching and learning, with particular emphasis on literacy education, History education, digital learning, AI-supported pedagogy and the design and evaluation of innovative educational resources.
    I hold a PhD from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, where my doctoral research examined multimodal literacy and the teaching of History in primary education. I also hold postgraduate degrees in Educational Organization and Administration and Applied Pedagogy.
    Alongside my research activity, I have 20 years of experience in primary education and extensive experience in educational leadership, school innovation, teacher professional development and the implementation of national and European educational initiatives.
    My current research interests include:
    • Multimodality and multimodal literacy
    • AI in education and AI-supported learning
    • Educational innovation and digital pedagogy
    • Multimodal textbook and OER design
    • Literacy and History education
    • Inclusive and sustainable education
    • Educational leadership and organizational development
    I am particularly interested in international research collaborations, academic opportunities, European educational projects and interdisciplinary initiatives connecting educational theory with practice.
    Researcher | Educator | Educational Innovator | School Leader

  • Symeon Nikolidakis, PhD Sociology of Education, Visiting Assistant Professor at University of Limassol, Greece

    PhD Sociology of Education, Visiting Assistant Professor at University of Limassol,

References

Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary

objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132-169.

Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on Bullying at School: Science Forgotten? Developmental Review, 27(1), 90–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002

Eden, S., Heiman, T., &Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions, beliefs and concerns about cyberbullying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1036–1052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01363.x

Forsberg, C., &Thornberg, R. (2016). The social ordering of belonging: Children’s perspectives on bullying. International Journal of Educational Research, 78, 13–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.008

Galanis, G. N., &Triantafyllidou-Galani, S. (2004). Psychological terror in school today. Eleutherna: Scientific Yearbook of the Department of Psychology of the University of Crete, 1.

Girard, R. (1986). The Scapegoat. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Goffman, E., & Best, J. (2005). Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. Aldine Transaction.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Khanolainen, D., Hall, A., Craig, W., Trach, J., Noetzel, J., Starosta, L., Dhungana-Sainju, K., Bjärehed, J., Thornberg, R., Bayram-Özdemir, S., Bjärehed, M., Görzig, A., Wright, M., Betts, L., Swearer, S., & Hymel, S. (2026). An international investigation of variability in teacher perceptions of bias-based bullying and their likelihood of intervening. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 8, 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-025-00285-6

Kazaki, V. (2025). Mobbing. Its presence in public institutions, hospitals and schools [Master’s dissertation, Democritus University of Thrace]. Alexandroupolis.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.

Lamont, M., &Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107

Malama, V. (2015). Cyberbullying in Greece: Investigation of the phenomenon from primary to secondary education [PhD dissertation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens]. Athens, Greece.

Moukatzi, L., Eleftherakis, G., &Zaranis, N. (2026). From static reports to dynamic sensors: a conceptual framework for modeling math anxiety in technology-enhanced learning. Discover Education, 5(1), 471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01512-y

Nikolidakis, S. & Kosmas, P. (2025). «Digital Technologies for Project- Based Learning in Distance Education», in Project-Based Learning, Competency Based Assessments, and Experiential Education for Modern Learners (Athanasekou, M. &Zagorianakos, A. eds.) US: IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Nikolidakis, S. & Kota, E. (2025). «Beyond the Transmission of Knowledge: The Role of the Teacher as a Mediator in Contemporary Pedagogical Paradigms», in Experiential and Inclusive Pedagogies: Mental Health, Ethics, and the Human Dimensions of Learning (Athanasekou, M. &Zagorianakos, A. eds.) US: IGI Global Scientific Publishing

Nikolidakis, S. & Kota, E. (2026). “The Educator as an AI-based Mediator in the Era of Education 5.0: Reducing Educational Inequalities”. 1st International Conference on AI in Education — AI Education 2025, Thessaloniki: International Hellenic University

Nikolidakis, S., Tromara, S. &Pliogou, V. (2026). “From Algorithm to Human: Pedagogical Autonomy, Critical Literacy, and Bridging Social Inequalities in the Age of Artificial Intelligence”. 1st International Conference on AI in Education — AI Education 2025, Thessaloniki: International Hellenic University

Nikolidakis, S., &Potamias, G. (2026). Systemic Vulnerabilities: How School Organizational Culture Shapes Mobbing Practices and Pedagogical Interventions. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(7), https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700382.

Nipedal, C., Nesdale, D., & Killen, M. (2010). Social group norms, school norms, and children’s aggressive intentions. Aggress Behav, 36(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20342

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Wiley.

Papadopoulou, D., & Vasileiou, I. (2026). Making sense of verbal bullying in early childhood: Preschool teachers’ perspectives and reported practices in Athens, Greece. International Journal of Human Behavior and Society Scope, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54536/ijhbss.v1i1.8531

Potamias, G. &Nikolidakis, S. (2026). “The Architecture of Exclusion: A Socio-Pedagogical Analysis of Mobbing Dynamics in Primary and Secondary Education”. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies. 6(4), 958-968

Potamias, G. &Kanari,P.(2026) Multimodal Interpretation of a Mobbing Paradigm in the School Workplace. In Samioti, P., Sipitanos, K &Katsarou, E.(Eds.)Revisiting Disinformation Critical Media Literacy Approaches. Faculty of letters university of Crete: Rethymno 2026. Electronic edition (e-PDF) ISBN 978-618-5762-03-2

Potamias, G. (2024). Pedagogical and didactic competence in contemporary educational environments: The multimodal approach [in Greek]. Grigoris Publications. ISBN: 978-960-612-494-5

Potamias, G. (2026a). Multimodality, Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Learning Environments in Primary Education: The Role of New Technologies in Enhancing Inclusion and Effective Evaluation of Teachers’ Work in New technologies in special and inclusive education Theory, research and teaching practices [in Greek]. (Kosmas, P. &Nikolidakis, eds.) Grigoris Publications. ISBN: 978-960-612-605-5

Potamias, G. (2026b). Evaluating teachers’ multimodal practices in digital and hybrid learning environments: Integrating geography and history through experiential and arts-based pedagogies in primary education.

In M. Athanasekou (Ed.), Experiential Learning and Creative Pedagogies in Digital and Arts Education (pp. 193–220). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-2600-2443-0.ch007

Reyes, C. A. P. D., & Diaz, R. R. (2026). Discipline strategies practiced by the public elementary school teachers in an island district. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 5(3), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v5i3.8050

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007

Sharp, S., & Smith, P. K. (1994). School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203425497

Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., &Frisén, A. (2012). Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643670

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel& W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.

Thornberg, R. (2015). School Bullying as a Collective Action: Stigma Processes and Identity Struggling. Children & Society, 29(4), 310–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12058

Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2018). Victimisation of school bullying: A social ecological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 38, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.11.006

Tsiakalos, G. (2008). School bullying (Pedagogical approach). In Y. Panousis (Ed.), Dangerous children or children at risk? Protagonists and victims of youth criminality (pp. 132–137). Lector.

Whittaker, E., & Kowalski, R. M. (2015). Cyberbullying Via Social Media. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.949377

Downloads

Published

2026-10-20

How to Cite

Potamias, G. ., & Nikolidakis, S. . (2026). The Micro-Sociology of the Classroom: Group Boundaries, Collective Aggression, and Pedagogical Agency in Student Mobbing. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 5(4), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v5i4.8666

Similar Articles

1-10 of 39

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.