Monitoring and Evaluation Techniques and Project Performance of Internally Displaced Persons’ (IDPs) Project: A Case of Danwadaag in Mogadishu Somalia

Authors

  • Ibrahim Mohamed Warsame Kampala International University (KIU), Uganda https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5179-431X
  • Friday Christopher Department of Political and Administrative Studies, Kampala International University (KIU), Uganda https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7794-7425
  • Benjamin B. Oluka Department of Political and Administrative Studies, Kampala International University (KIU), Uganda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v4i3.4986

Keywords:

Critical Path Identification, Critical Task Scheduling, Danwadaag Project, Monitoring and Evaluation, Project Performance, Risk Allocation

Abstract

The study investigated on the influence of Monitoring and Evaluation Technique on Internally Displaced People on Project Performance with specific on Danwadaag project in Mogadishu Somalia. To examine the effects of Critical Path Identification on Danwadaag Project Performance, to evaluate the effects of Critical Task Scheduling on Danwadaag Project Performance and to investigate effects of Critical Risk Allocation on Danwadaag Project Performance. The study analyzed through two key theories: the Theory of Constraints (TOC) and the Results-Based Management (RBM) approach. The study employed descriptive correlation research design. The study population comprised of 260 subjects, from which a sample size of 158 was selected according to Kothari, 2004, out of whom 128 fully participated in the study, indicating a response rate of 81%. The study used both qualitative and quantitative techniques to collect and analyse data. The findings indicate that Critical Path Identification (CPI) has a significant positive impact on the performance 37.5% while Critical Task Scheduling (CTS) significantly enhances the performance 65.3% and Critical Risk Allocation (CRA) has had a mixed impact on the performance 44.9%. The study concludes that Critical Path Identification (CPI) significantly enhances the performance of the Danwadaag Project by improving task scheduling, coordination, project timelines, and resource management. Similarly, Critical Task Scheduling (CTS) positively impacts project performance by enhancing timeline accuracy, resource allocation, and overall project outcomes. However, Critical Risk Allocation (CRA) demonstrates a mixed influence, suggesting that its effective implementation in planning, monitoring, coordination, and resource allocation can improve project outcomes, though uncertainties about its effectiveness remain. The researcher recommends that the Danwadaag Project management should ensure the full integration of Critical Path Identification (CPI) by involving all key stakeholders, including project team members and external consultants, in task scheduling and resource coordination. The researcher further recommended that the Danwadaag project should prioritize the implementation of Critical Task Scheduling (CTS) by involving all relevant stakeholders, including project teams and coordinators, in the scheduling process. While CRA shows potential for improving project outcomes through risk mitigation, the study acknowledges its limitations and offers recommendations for better implementation. The future studies could assess the role of technology in enhancing the implementation of CPI, CTS, and CRA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Benjamin B. Oluka, Department of Political and Administrative Studies, Kampala International University (KIU), Uganda

Supervisor and Ass. Professor, Department of Political and Administrative Studies (PhD) Kampala International University (KIU).

References

Abeyrama, T., Tilakasena, W., Weber, & Karl, E. (2008). Monitoring in retrospect: Reflections on practical experience and recommendations. In Studies on human settlements development in Asia. Bangkok, India: Division of Human Settlements Development, Asian Institute.

Action Aid. (2008). Accountability, learning, and planning system (with notes to accompany ALPS). London, UK: Action Aid. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from Hamlyn House, Macdonald Road, Archway, London N19 5P.

Alcock, P. (2009). Targets, indicators, and milestones. Public Management Review, 6(2).

Armonia, R. C., Dindo, M., & Campilan, D. (2006). Participatory monitoring and evaluation: The Asian experience. Regional overview paper prepared for the International Workshop on Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, Cavite, Philippines.

Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2013). Performance management: The new realities. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2006). The practice of social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bamberger, M. (2008). Enhancing the utilization of evaluations for evidence-based policymaking. In M. Segone (Ed.), Bridging the gap.

Banihashemi, S., Hosseini, M. R., Golizadeh, H., & Sankaran, S. (2017). Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1103–1119.

Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2010). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the “new public sector.” Management Accounting Research, 11(3).

Charya, B. Y., Kumar, V., Satyamurti, R., & Tandon, R. (2006). Reflections on participatory evaluation: The Private Voluntary Organization for Health-II (PVOH) experience. Paper presented at the International Conference on Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences and Lessons, Cavite, Philippines.

Cheng, M.-I., Dainty, A., & Moore, D. (2007). Implementing a new performance management system within an organization-based organization. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(1).

Cleland, D. I., & Ireland, L. R. (2007). Organization management: Strategic design and implementation (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education. Routledge Falmer.

Crisp, J. (2018). Forced displacement in Africa: Dimensions, difficulties, and policy directions. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 37(2), 152–174.

Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189–201.

Frankel, N., & Gage, A. (2007). M&E fundamentals: A self-guided minicourse. Measure Evaluation. Retrieved February 24, 2014.

Gido, J., Clements, J., & Baker, B. (2018). Successful project management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Heerkens, G., & Baker, B. (2017). Project management: A practical approach. McGraw-Hill Education.

Hailey, J., & Sorgenfrei, M. (2009). Measuring success: Issues in performance measurement (Praxis Programme Series No. 44). INTRAC.

Hogger, R., Kuchli, C., Zimmerman, A., Engler, M., & Vokra, E. (2011). Monitoring: Keeping in touch with reality. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Khan, A. M. (2001). A guidebook on results-based monitoring and evaluation: Key concepts, issues, and applications. Monitoring and Progress Review Division, Ministry of Plan Implementation.

Kohli, U. T., & Chitkara, K. K. (2008). Organization management handbook. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Krzysztof, J., Potkański, T., & Stanisław, A. (2011). Internal organization M&E system and development of evaluation capacity: Experience of the World Bank-funded rural development. World Bank.

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.

Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2021). Project management: The managerial process (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Mackay, K. (2007). How to build monitoring and evaluation systems to support better government. World Bank.

Mafusire, A., Tunya, D., Somorin, O., Ntege-Wassawa, M., Ahmed, M. A. A., Dava, E., Bahemuka, S., Katala, J., Abiyehoy, G. M., Sharan, M., Kyokunda, G., Tambwe, M. S., Nandujja, M. M., Chikoko, M., & Sakwa, S. (2021). African Development Bank African Development Fund Federal Government of Somalia combined 2017–2021 country brief completion report and 2020 country portfolio performance review. East Africa Regional Development and Business Delivery Office (RDGE) & Country Economics Department (ECCE).

Marren, J. (2016). Factors for successful implementation of projects in Somalia. Journal of Somali Development Studies, 8(2), 45–62.

Menkhaus, K. (2017). Conflict assessment and conflict sensitivity in development programming in Somalia. Peaceworks, 121, 1–32.

Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2020). Project management: A managerial approach (10th ed.). Wiley.

Mgendi, G., Shiping, M., & Xiang, C. (2019a). A review of agricultural technology transfer in Africa: Lessons from Japan and China case projects in Tanzania and Kenya. Sustainability, 11(23), 6598.

Mgendi, G., Shiping, M., & Xiang, C. (2019b). A review of agricultural technology transfer in Africa: Lessons from Japan and China case projects in Tanzania and Kenya. Sustainability, 11(23), 6598.

Msila, V., & Setlhako, A. (2013). Evaluation of programs: Reading Carol H. Weiss. University of South Africa, College of Education, Department of Education Leadership and Management. Pretoria, South Africa: Horizon Research Publishing.

Nicholas, J. M., & Steyn, H. (2022). Project management for engineering, business, and technology (6th ed.). Routledge.

Nyonje, R. O., Ndunge, K. D., & Mulwa, A. S. (2012). Monitoring and evaluation of organizations and programs: A handbook for students and practitioners. Aura Publishers.

Ogula, P. A. (2002). Monitoring and evaluation of educational organizations and programs. New Kemit Publishers.

PAMFORK. (2007). Report of workshop on using participatory methodologies for monitoring and evaluation. Participatory Methodologies for Monitoring and Evaluation, South-South Sharing Forum.

Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). Project Management Institute.

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.

Razak, A. A., Majid, Z. A. A., Basrawi, F., Sharol, A. F., Ruslan, M. H., & Sopian, K. (2019). A performance and techno-economic study of different geometrical designs of compact single-pass cross-matrix solar air collector with square-tube absorbers. Solar Energy, 178, 314–330.

Rodgers, P., & Williams, B. (2006). Evaluation for practice improvement and organizational learning. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation. London: Sage Publishers.

Schwandt, T. A., & Burgon, H. (2006). Evaluation and the study of live experience. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation. London: Sage Publishers.

Schwartz, R., & Mayne, J. (2005). Quality matters: Seeking confidence in evaluating, auditing, and performance reporting. Transaction Publishers.

Serpe, A., Smith, T., & Johnson, L. (2022). Addressing challenges to project effectiveness in Somalia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, International Journal of Development Studies, 8(2), 76–89.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2020). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2019.

Wang, J., & Li, S. (2022). Examination of determinants of project performance in construction companies in Mogadishu. European Journal of Business and Management.

Yusuf, R. E. (2020). The impact of international trade on poverty in least developed countries: With empirical study on Bangladesh and Somalia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 9(10).

Zwikael, O., & Meredith, J. (2019). Evaluating the success of a project and the performance of its leaders. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1–13.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-08

How to Cite

Warsame, I. M., Christopher, F., & Oluka, B. B. (2025). Monitoring and Evaluation Techniques and Project Performance of Internally Displaced Persons’ (IDPs) Project: A Case of Danwadaag in Mogadishu Somalia. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 4(3), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v4i3.4986