Verbing the Unverbable: A Pragma-Cognitive Analysis of Creative Verb Formations in New Media Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/jnll.v4i2.8739Keywords:
Construction Grammar, Conversion, Cyberpragmatics, Denominal Verbs, Word FormationAbstract
“The food is not fooding” sounds, at first hearing, like an error. It is instead an instance of a productive and largely unexamined new-media construction in which a noun is converted into a verb and placed beside its own source, so that the clause asks whether the noun is living up to its own name. This study terms the construction sarcastic verbing and analyses it through an integrated framework combining conversion theory, Construction Grammar and cyberpragmatics, informed by the echoic account of irony. Sixty-one candidate instances from Facebook, X and TikTok (November 2025–August 2026) were coded independently by two coders on a three-tier instrument recording derivational route and lexical status, entrenchment and frame type, and pragmatic function and polarity; the thirty-two instances coded identically by both were retained for analysis. Zero-derivation accounts for 29 of the 32 items, and entrenchment spans the full cline from frame-bound coinage to fully lexicalised verbs, indicating a construction caught at several stages of conventionalisation at once. Within the frame-bearing subset (n = 20), negated instances consistently performed mock-complaint and affirmed instances performed praise or social commentary. Because several of the clearest ironic instances involve ordinary verbs with no lexical novelty, the study argues that the construction’s evaluative force resides in the echoic frame rather than in individual coinages.
References
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3
Balteiro, I. (2007). The directionality of conversion in English: A dia-synchronic study (Linguistic Insights, Vol. 59). Peter Lang.
Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge University Press.
Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55(4), 767–811. https://doi.org/10.2307/412745
franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Ghomeshi, J., Jackendoff, R., Rosen, N., & Russell, K. (2004). Contrastive focus reduplication in English (the salad-salad paper). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 22(2), 307–357. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000015789.98638.f9
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
Gottfurcht, C. A. (2008). Denominal verb formation in English [Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University]. https://linguistics.northwestern.edu/documents/dissertations/linguistics-research-graduate-dissertations-gottfurchtdissertation2007.pdf
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. Macmillan.
Joshua, S., & Egbe, P. E. (2025). A pragmatic analysis of slangs in Nigerian social media advertising. Journal of Natural Language and Linguistics, 3(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.54536/jnll.v3i1.4521
Kulkarni, V., & Wang, W. Y. (2017). TFW, DamnGina, Juvie, and Hotsie-Totsie: On the linguistic and social aspects of internet slang [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.08291
Kulkarni, V., & Wang, W. Y. (2018). Simple models for word formation in slang. In M. Walker, H. Ji, & A. Stent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 1424–1434). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1129
Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach (2nd ed.). C. H. Beck.
Michaelis, L. A., & Hsiao, A. M. (2021). Verbing and linguistic innovation. Frontiers in Communication, 6, Article 604763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.604763
Muravyev, N. A., Panchenko, A. I., & Obiedkov, S. A. (2014). Neologisms on Facebook. In Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies: Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue” 2014. https://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2014/materials/pdf/MuravyevNA.pdf
Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 (Nigeria).
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Un Nisa, S. (2024). A linguistic analysis of emoji’s: Exploring the role of language in the digital age of Generation Z. Journal of Natural Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.54536/jnll.v2i1.3222
Wierzbicka, A. (1987). Boys will be boys: “Radical semantics” vs. “radical pragmatics.” Language, 63(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/415385
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87(1–2), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E
Würschinger, Q. (2021). Social networks of lexical innovation: Investigating the social dynamics of diffusion of neologisms on Twitter. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 648583. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.648583
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213
Yus, F. (2016). Humour and relevance. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4
Yusuff, A. A., Sanni, A. O., & Kareem, S. (2024). Communicative and language patterns in popular slangs in Nigeria. Journal of Communication Pedagogy and Practice, 1(1). https://fountainjournals.com/index.php/JCPP/article/view/575
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gabriel Ndamzi Amadi, Michael Alozie Nwala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
