Exploring Emoji Use and Frequency Among Mongolian Users: Examples from Facebook and Twitter


  • Narmandakh Khaltar Mongolian National University of Education, Mongolia
  • Tsolmon Shirnen Mongolian National University of Education, Mongolia




Internet Linguistics, Computer-Mediated Discourse (CMD) in Mongolia, Emoji Use, Frequency, Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC)


Internet linguistics has been rapidly improving since the advent of the Internet; humanity has come to value or emphasize a new form of communication, the Internet, or computer-mediated communication (CMC) around the world. Emoji is a graphical image, representing attitudes or concepts, and emotional feelings in a simple way. Emojis became popular around 2010 worldwide and can be used on any smartphone or computer in a message or conversation. Dresner & Herring stated that some social factors include the gender and the age of CMD users (2010). Emoji is one of people’s emotional and facial expressions, and its use exceeds the standard norm of the language, especially on Facebook and Twitter, known as the most used platforms in Mongolian internet communication. We have studied one of the sociolinguistics studies, the emoji use on Facebook and Twitter in Mongolian computer-mediated discourse, also known as conversational discourse, comparing people’s age, gender, emoji use, and frequency through the questionnaire we processed. The findings of the study show that people write online using excessive emojis, which means that emojis have become an integral part of people’s everyday life. Following excessive use of emojis, there is a fear that may lead to language extinction, and the spelling rules may be compromised, which could adversely affect the official written language. We hope that this study will contribute to the scholarly literature on computer-mediated discourse in general, Mongolian computer-mediated discourse in particular, and the emoji use and its frequency, a recently introduced in our country and a little-studied feature of computer-mediated discourse.


Download data is not yet available.


Androutsopoulos, J. (2006). Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 419-438.

Borolzoi, D. (2019). Mongolian language norms and rules on the internet, Ulaanbaatar, Dissertation.

David, C. (2001). Language and the Internet, NY, 28.

Dresner, E., & Herring, S. (2010). Functions of the Non-Verbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force in Communication Theory, 249-268.

Enkhmaa, B. (2015). Internet Linguistics, UB, Soyombo Printing, 84-85.

Herring, S. C. (2007). A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse. http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761

Larsson, A. O. (2017). Diversifying Likes. Journalism Practice, 12(3), 326-343.

Lebduska, L. (2014). Emoji, emoji, what for art thou? Harlot: A Revealing Look Arts Persuasion, 1(1).

Markman, K. M., & Oshima, S. (2007). Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse, in Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference, 8.

McCulloch, G. (2019). Because Internet. Understanding the new rules of language. New York City, Riverhead Books.

Nansalmaa, N. (2020). Brain language consciousness. Ulaanbaatar. NUM Press, 314.

Steinmetz, K. (2015). Oxford’s 2015 Word of the Year Is This Emoji. Time. Retrieved from https://time.com/4114886/oxford-word-of-the-year-2015- emoji/.

Tuttle, M. (2016). Emoji essay. Emoji: Imperfectly Filling a Gap in Text-based Communication. Retrieved from https://blogs.ubc.ca/mollytuttle/essay




How to Cite

Khaltar, N., & Shirnen, T. (2022). Exploring Emoji Use and Frequency Among Mongolian Users: Examples from Facebook and Twitter. American Journal of Youth and Women Empowerment, 1(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajywe.v1i1.924