The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v5i1.7210Keywords:
AI Regulation, Algorithmic Accountability, Artificial Intelligence, Co-Regulation, Legal ProfessionAbstract
The use of artificial intelligence is fundamentally changing the legal profession more than ever before, altering the provision of legal services in terms of research, drafting, contract analysis, predictive analytics, and dispute resolution. Along with the scope and importance of this change, the current regulatory frameworks encompassing international governance tools, supranational laws, national laws, and the frameworks of professional bodies are structurally unsatisfactory to tackle the unique accountability, transparency, confidentiality, access to justice issues that AI creates in the legal environment. The paper contributes to the theoretical and conceptual reasoning about the regulatory issues of AI in the legal profession based on the regulatory theory, legal theory, and the new interdisciplinary research on AI regulation. The paper takes a critical look at the key uses of AI in legal practice, compares five regulatory domains with the particular needs of legal AI governance, and a conceptual model basing on four normative pillars: transparency, accountability, human oversight, and access to justice. The model is designed on the basis of a co-regulatory institutional framework that combines binding statutory standards with professional body skills and international harmonisation processes. The article claims that to regulate AI responsibly within the legal profession, it is necessary to find a purposeful reconceptualization of regulatory architecture that would be responsive to the technical realities of AI deployment but not lose sight of the foundational values of the legal profession and the rule of law.
Downloads
References
Ben-Daniel, D. O. (2025). Impact of generative artificial intelligence on the global entertainment industry and its legal dynamics. American Journal of Society and Law, 4(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v4i1.4566
Binns, R. (2018). Algorithmic accountability and public law. Public Law, 2018(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3016434
Calo, R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2422145
Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080
Daly, A., Hagendorff, T., Hui, L., Loh, W., & McCosker, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence governance and ethics: Global perspectives. In The Oxford handbook of ethics of AI. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.42
Ebers, M. (2021). Standardizing AI: The case of the European Commission’s proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act. The International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 29(4), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaab006
Floridi, L. (2021). The European legislation on AI: A brief analysis of its philosophical approach. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00463-x
Guihot, M., Matthew, A., & Suzor, N. (2017). Nudging robots: Innovative solutions to regulate artificial intelligence. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 20(2), 385–456. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2933610
Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023). Regulating ChatGPT and other large generative AI models: Strategic and legal implications. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1112–1123. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594067
Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Law as computation in the era of artificial intelligence: Anthropocentrism unchained? University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(s1), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2017-0041
Larson, D. A. (2025). Addressing the ethical and legal crossroads: The impact of ChatGPT within the legal field. Information & Communications Technology Law, 34(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2025.2502244
Linna, D. W. (2025). Generative AI systems in legal practice: Offering quality legal services while upholding legal ethics. International Journal of Law in Context, 21(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174455232500012X
Martínez, M. T. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence: An analysis of ethical frameworks disciplining AI in justice. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(3), 633–660. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1266
Mayson, S. (2025). Responsible regulation of artificial intelligence in the legal profession. Modern Law Review, 88(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12988
McGinnis, J. O., & Pearce, R. G. (2014). The great disruption: How machine intelligence will transform the role of lawyers in the delivery of legal services. Fordham Law Review, 82(6), 3041–3066. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2436937
Novelli, C., Hacker, P., Morley, J., Trondal, J., & Floridi, L. (2024). A robust governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 32(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae001
Okibe, S., & Essien, E. O. (2025). EndSARS to EFCC: Trading one nightmare for another. American Journal of Society and Law, 4(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v4i1.3259
Remus, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in legal practice: Benefits, considerations, and ethical implications. DRI White Papers, 2024, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4578901
Remus, D., & Levy, F. (2017). Can robots be lawyers? Computers, lawyers, and the practice of law. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 30(3), 501–558. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2815788
Rodgers, I., Armour, J., & Sako, M. (2023). How technology is (or is not) transforming law firms. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 19, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111522-074716
Sartor, G., & Lagioia, F. (2020). The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on artificial intelligence. European Parliament Panel for the Future of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2861/293
Smuha, N. A. (2021). Beyond the EU AI Act: The role of ethics in AI governance. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977218
Sourdin, T. (2018). Judge v robot? Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making. UNSW Law Journal, 41(4), 1114–1133. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3308825
Surden, H. (2014). Machine learning and law. Washington Law Review, 89(1), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2417415
Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.9785/crer-2021-220402
Wieringa, M. (2020). What to account for when accounting for algorithms: A systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372833
Zalnieriute, M., Bennett Moses, L., & Williams, G. (2019). The rule of law and automation of government decision-making. Modern Law Review, 82(3), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12412
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novera Bhatti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
