The Use of Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

Authors

  • Novera Bhatti DePaul College of Law, 25 E. Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL 60604, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v5i1.7211

Keywords:

Admissibility, Chain of Custody, Criminal Proceedings, Digital Evidence, Digital Forensics

Abstract

The use of digital evidence has become an essential part of contemporary criminal proceedings as it has radically transformed the way justice systems investigate, prosecute as well as adjudicate crime. The ever-increasing data volume created by computers, mobile devices, cloud computing systems, and Internet of Things devices has presented both unmatched possibilities in the crime detection process and very difficult challenges to the legal systems that are in place to regulate the flow of such data to be collected, stored, analyzed and presented. The current evidentiary and procedural systems - designed to work in a physical evid25 E. Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL 60604, USA.ence world - are, in turn, becoming stretched by the instability, complexity, and location-based fluidity of digital information, introducing systemic threats to procedural fairness and the presumption of innocence. The article goes beyond a pure theoretical and conceptual discussion of the digital evidence at the criminal proceedings level, relying on the digital forensics literature, evidence law, and the theory of governance. It critically analyzes admissibility norms in the leading legal systems, models of the forensic process and regulatory difficulties of new forms of evidence. The paper suggests a four-pillar governance framework such as legal standards, forensic integrity, chain of custody, and fairness and rights with the underlying international harmonisation and technological adaptation mechanisms. This article posits that the digital evidence needs not only technical enhancement of the forensic approach, but a deliberate redefinition of the regulatory structure that is adaptable to the technological advancement without losing the basic principles of criminal justice fairness, accuracy, and protection against false conviction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angel, O. E. M., Mercedes, C., Elisa, Q. L., & Gissel, M. R. M. (2024). Digital evidence as a means of proof in criminal proceedings. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(1), e04585. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-061

Arshad, H., Jantan, A. B., & Abiodun, O. I. (2018). Digital forensics: Review of issues in scientific validation of digital evidence. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 14(4), 956–976. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.04.0084

Batista, D., Mangeth, A. L., Frajhof, I., Alves, P. H., & Endler, M. (2023). Exploring blockchain technology for chain of custody control in physical evidence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(8), Article 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080360

Casey, E. (2011). Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-19445-5

Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., Spathoulas, G., Anagnostopoulos, M., Ghosal, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK: Cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence. Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1), tyac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014

Dmitrieva, A. A., & Pastukhov, P. S. (2023). Concept of electronic evidence in criminal legal procedure. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(1), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-5108.2023.1.155-178

Garfinkel, S. L. (2010). Digital forensics research: The next 10 years. Digital Investigation, 7, S64–S73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2010.05.009

Goodison, S. E., Davis, R. C., & Jackson, B. A. (2015). Digital evidence and the U.S. criminal justice system. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR890

Horsman, G. (2019). Digital evidence: A review of the admissibility of the automated forensic tool. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 29, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2019.03.004

Ismail, I., & Ariffin, K. A. Z. (2025). The admissibility of digital evidence from open-source forensic tools: Development of a framework for legal acceptance. PLOS ONE, 20(1), e0331683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331683

Komalasari, R., & Mustafa, C. (2023). Electronic evidence in the healthy justice system. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(3), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.547-566

Kumar, S., & Kumar, S. (2024). Reimagining the legislative framework: A historical analysis of decolonization and public voice in India’s law-making. American Journal of Society and Law, 3(2), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v3i2.3165

Leroux, O. (2004). Legal admissibility of electronic evidence. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360086042000223508

Losavio, M., Pastukhov, P., & Polyakova, S. (2016). The Internet of Things and the smart city: Legal challenges with digital forensics, privacy, and security. Security and Communication Networks, 9(13), 2128–2137. https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.1469

Mason, S., & Seng, D. (Eds.). (2021). Electronic evidence and electronic signatures. University of London Press. https://doi.org/10.14296/221.9781911507260

Miller, C. M. (2022). A survey of prosecutors and investigators using digital evidence: A starting point. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 42, Article 301416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301416

Nance, K., Hay, B., & Bishop, M. (2012). Digital forensics: Beyond the laboratory. IEEE Security & Privacy, 10(6), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.148

Novak, M. (2020). Digital evidence in criminal cases before the U.S. Courts of Appeals: Trends and issues for digital forensics. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 14(4), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2020.1603

Park, Y., & Jeong, D. (2026). A blockchain-based digital evidence management system: Integrating forensic procedures and multi-party authorization. Information Processing & Management, 63(1), 103946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.103946

Pollitt, M. M. (2013). The history of digital forensics. In Advances in Digital Forensics IX (pp. 3–15). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41148-9_1

Quick, D., & Choo, K. K. R. (2014). Digital forensics out of the box: The use of enterprise search technologies to identify evidence on cloud storage. Digital Investigation, 11(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2014.03.001

Ruan, K., Carthy, J., Kechadi, T., & Baggili, I. (2013). Cloud forensics: An overview. In Advances in Digital Forensics IX (pp. 35–46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41148-9_3

Sabillon, R., Serra-Ruiz, J., Cavaller, V., & Cano, J. J. (2017). Digital forensic analysis of cybercrimes: Best practices and methodologies. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 15(7), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3010363

Slom, F. A. A. (2024). The role of good governance in promoting human rights in Sudan. American Journal of Arts and Human Science. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i3.2884

Stoykova, R. (2021). Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 105575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575

Stoykova, R. A. (2024). A new right to procedural accuracy: A governance model for digital evidence in criminal proceedings. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105912

Tsai, F. C., Chang, S. C., Lin, J. H., & Lin, C. H. (2021). The application of blockchain of custody in criminal investigation process. Procedia Computer Science, 187, 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.054

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

The Use of Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. (2026). American Journal of Society and Law, 5(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsl.v5i1.7211