The Implications of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) in Fostering Livelihoods in Rwanda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajds.v4i1.6185Keywords:
Citizens Assemblies, Livelihood, Participatory Rural Appraisal, Social Equity and Inclusive DevelopmentAbstract
There is a growing emphasis on moving away from conventional survey questionnaires towards innovative participatory appraisal and analysis methods, enabling local rural or urban populations to take on tasks previously carried out by external parties. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) involves an appraisal and analysis process that can result in local community or group action, such as the implementation of experiments planned and de-signed by farmers. The purpose of this paper was to examine the impact of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) on livelihood development in Rwanda, with a focus on a citizens’ assembly in Bugesera district. Specifically, the study aims to assess the benefits of PRA, the main obstacles faced by citizens in fully engaging in PRA initiatives like citizens assemblies and key strategies to address them. Both primary and secondary sources were utilized for this research. Primary data was gathered through questionnaire surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions. The data demonstrated a strong connection between PRA and livelihood development in Rwanda. For instance, findings revealed that PRA resulted in increased accountability of leaders, transparency in public services, greater citizen participation, improved planning, monitoring, and evaluation, and provided a platform for citizens to voice their concerns and needs. Additionally, the data highlighted various challenges hindering full citizen partic-ipation in PRA initiatives, such as lack of education, poverty, corruption, and fear of expressing concerns. Therefore, the study suggests recommendations for the government to promote education, empower economically disadvantaged individuals, enhance decentralization efforts, and implement measures to combat corruption at the local level.
Downloads
References
Adamolekun, L. (1991). Decentralization policies: problems and perspectives. Asian Journal of Public Admin-istration, 13(1), 67-92.
Ahimbazwe, E., Muhindi, S., & Thinguri, R. (2024). Influence of Citizens’ Participation on Human Security in Nyamyumba Sector of Rubavu District in Rwanda. African Quarterly Social Science Review, 1(4).
Ahmad, S., S. M. Khalid, and S. M. Ahmad. (2018). Using Participatory Rural Appraisal for a Community Needs Assessment in Timor-Leste. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 25(4), 63-73.
Alam, A., & Ihsan, S. (2012). Role of participatory rural appraisal in community development (A case study of Barani area development project in agriculture, livestock and forestry development in Ko-hat). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(8), 25.
Arias-Gómez, J., Villasís-Keever, M. Á., & Miranda-Novales, M. G. (2016). The research protocol III. Study population. Revista Alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico: 1993), 63(2), 201-206.
Bainbridge, V. (1998). Participatory Approaches and Agriculture Topic Pack. Brighton: Institute of Develop-ment Studies.
Banks, A. M. (2007). Expanding participation in constitution making: challenges and opportunities. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 49, 1043.
Binns, T., Hill, T., & Nel, E. (1997). Learning from the people: participatory rural appraisal, geography and ru-ral development in the ‘new’ South Africa. Applied Geography, 17(1), 1-9.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John wiley & sons.
Brown, M. E. (2006). Assessing natural resource management challenges in Senegal using data from participa-tory rural appraisals and remote sensing. World Development, 34(4), 751-767.
Campbell, J. (2002). A critical appraisal of participatory methods in development research. International Jour-nal of Social Research Methodology, 5(1), 19-29.
Campbell, J. R. (2001). Participatory rural appraisal as qualitative research: distinguishing methodological is-sues from participatory claims. Human Organization, 60(4), 380-389.
Cavestro, L. (2003). PRA-participatory rural appraisal concepts methodologies and techniques. Padova Univer-sity. Padova PD. Italia.
Chaleunvong, K. (2009). Data collection techniques. Training Course in Reproductive Health, Research Vien-tine.
Chambers, R. (1993). “Participatory rural appraisal” in N. Hudson et al. (eds.), Working with Farmers for Better Land Husbandry. London: Intermediate Technology Publications, pp. 87–95.
Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World development, 22(9), 1253-1268.
Chambers, R. (2004). Participatory Rural Appraisal: Methods and Applications in Rural Planning: Essays in Honour of Robert Chambers (Vol. 5). Concept Publishing Company.
Chandra, G. (2010). Participatory rural appraisal. Katiha, PK, Vaas, KK, Sharma, AP, Bhaumik, U. & Chandra Ganesh (Eds). Issues and tools for social science research in inland fisheries. Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata, India. Bulletin, 163, 286-302.
Christoplos, I. (1995). Representation, Poverty and PRA in the Mekong Delta. Research Report No. 6. Linkoping, Sweden: Linkoping University.
Drijver, C. (1994). Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): a challenge for people and protected areas. Parks, 4(1), 35-40.
Faguet, J. P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2-13.
Gaughan, E. (2009). Introduction to analysis (Vol. 1). American Mathematical Soc.
Gaynor, N. (2014). ‘A nation in a hurry’: the costs of local governance reforms in Rwanda. Review of African Political Economy, 41(sup1), S49-S63.
Gosselink, P., & Thompson, J. (1997). Application of participatory rural appraisal methods for action research on water management. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI).
Hasselskog, M. (2016, May). Participation or what? Local experiences and perceptions of household perfor-mance contracting in Rwanda. In Forum for Development Studies (Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 177-199). Routledge.
King, B. H. (2002). Towards a participatory GIS: evaluating case studies of participatory rural appraisal and GIS in the developing world. Cartography and geographic information science, 29(1), 43-52.
Lara, C. S., Crispín, A. F., & Téllez, M. C. L. (2018). Participatory rural appraisal as an educational tool to em-power sustainable community processes. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 4254-4262.
Leurs, R. (1996). Current challenges facing participatory rural appraisal. Public administration and develop-ment, 16(1), 57-72.
Mathur H.M. (1997). Participatory Development: Some Areas of Current Concern. Sociological Bulletin. 46(1), 53-95.
Mazhar, S. A., Anjum, R., Anwar, A. I., & Khan, A. A. (2021). Methods of data collection: A fundamental tool of research. Journal of Integrated Community Health, 10(1), 6-10.
Menconi, M. E., Grohmann, D., & Mancinelli, C. (2017). European farmers and participatory rural appraisal: A systematic literature review on experiences to optimize rural development. Land Use Policy, 60, 1-11.
MINALOC. (2014). National strategy for community development and local economic development.,
MINALOC. (2018). Governance and Decentralization Sector Strategic Plan (2018/19 – 2023/24).
Mosse, D. (1994). Authority, gender and knowledge: theoretical reflections on the practice of participatory rural appraisal. Development and change, 25(3), 497-526.
Mustanir, A., Barisan, B., & Hamid, H. (2017). Participatory rural appraisal as the participatory planning method of development planning. In Indonesian Association for Public Administration (IAPA) Interna-tional Conference Towards Open Government: Finding the Whole Government Approach (pp. 77-84).
Myers, J. L., Well, A. D., & Lorch Jr, R. F. (2013). Research design and statistical analysis. Routledge.
Narayanasamy, N. (2009). Participatory rural appraisal: Principles, methods and application. SAGE Publica-tions Ltd.
Never Again Rwanda & Interpeace. (2019). Enhancing and reinforcing Rwandan citizen participation in existing local government consultation processes and platforms: Baseline Assessment Report. Nairobi, Kenya: Interpeace ECA.
Nichols-Barrer, I., Protik, A., Berman, J., & Sloan, M. (2015). Impacts of Supporting Civic Participation in Lo-cal Governance: Experimental Evidence from Rwanda. Mathematica Policy Research.
Niyonzima, E., & Bayu, E. K. (2023). Assessing the Contributions of Rwanda Gender Equality Policies to the Women Empowerment in Rwanda. American Journal of Development Studies, 1(2), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajds.v1i2.2099
Protik, A. E., Nichols-Barrer, I., Berman, J., & Sloan, M. (2018). Bridging the information gap between citizens and local governments: Evidence from a civic participation strengthening program in Rwanda. World Development, 108, 145-156.
RGB. (2014). Citizen’s Voice on Service Delivery: Rwanda Citizen Report Card 2013. https://www.rgb.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/RGB/Publications/Citizen_Report_Card-CRC/CRC_2013.pdf
Ruterahagusha, R. (2009). Citizens’ participation and success of decentralized services delivery systems in Rwanda: a case study of Rubavu sector, Kampala International University.
Sandham, L. A., Chabalala, J. J., & Spaling, H. H. (2019). Participatory rural appraisal approaches for public participation in EIA: Lessons from South Africa. Land, 8(10), 150.
Shipsey, R. (2022). Making the 2022 Rwanda Census count. International Journal of Population Data Science, 7(3), 1846.
Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques and determination of sample size in applied statis-tics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1-22.
Stadler, J. (1995). Development, research and participation: Towards a critique of participatory rural appraisal methods. Development Southern Africa, 12(6), 805-814.
Twizeyimana, J. D., Larsson, H., & Grönlund, Å. (2018). E‑government in Rwanda: Implementation, challenges and reflections. Electronic Journal of E-government, 16(1), 19-31.
Webber, L. M., & Ison, R. L. (1995). Participatory rural appraisal design: conceptual and process is-sues. Agricultural systems, 47(1), 107-131.
Work, R. (2002). Overview of decentralization worldwide: a stepping stone to improved governance and human development.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ntambara D., Hahirwa G. J.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
