The Use of Interactive Lecture in Teaching Professional Education Courses among Preservice Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajds.v3i2.4502Keywords:
Engagement Trigger, Interactive Lecture, Learning Experience, Student EngagementAbstract
Researches frequently highlight a positive relationship between interactive lectures and student engagement. However, limited studies have specifically explored students’ perceptions and learning experiences on the use of interactive lecture in improving student engagement especially within preservice education. Understanding these perspectives and experiences is important as preservice teachers are more likely to use similar approach in the future, potentially influencing the learning experiences of the next generation of learners. This led to the study’s determination of preservice teachers’ perceptions and their learning experiences regarding the use of interactive lectures in professional education courses, a field where traditional lecturing remains prevalent. In this study, mixed-method approach was used, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data through survey questionnaires, focus group discussions, and reflective journals from 44 preservice teachers enrolled in the Bachelor of Elementary Education program at Mariano Marcos State University College of Teacher Education, Philippines. Findings in the survey indicate that preservice teachers agreed that interactive lectures significantly enhanced their engagement. Thematic analysis further categorized students’ learning experiences and engagement into distinct themes, revealing insights into how interactive lectures shape their learning experiences.
Downloads
References
Afrasiabifar, A., & Asadolah, M. (2019). Effectiveness of shifting traditional lecture to interactive lecture to teach nursing students. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v37n1e07
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Cheema, H., & Arora, R. (2019). Effectiveness of interactive lectures as a teaching methodology in OBG among final-year medical students. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8(19), 1563–1571. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2019/347
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deshpande, P., Deshpande, S., & Kshirsagar, S. (2015). Evaluation of impact of interactive lectures on learning in terms of cognitive outcomes and student satisfaction. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 4(42), 7269–7274. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/1056
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
Ijaz, A., & Haq, S. (2014). Evaluation of strategies to increase students’ involvement for improving interactive lectures in chemical pathology. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 64(2), 237–243. https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/702
Khalid, K., & Ahmad, S. A. (2019). Effectiveness of interactive lecture on knowledge retention and students’ motivation in undergraduate medical education: A mixed-method study. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 69(1), 206–211. https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/2523
Meguid, E. A., & Collins, M. (2017). Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: Traditional versus interactive teaching. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 8, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s131851
Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 37–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redeen.2016.05.001
Ningsih, W. (2023). The analysis of the interactive lecturing approach to enhance students’ learning motivation in higher education institutions. Al-Hijr Journal of Adulearn World, 3(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v2i4.563
Sadykov, T., & Čtrnáctová, H. (2019). The students’ opinions toward interactive lectures. Proceedings of the 3rd International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education, BalticSTE2019, 199–202. https://doi.org/10.33225/balticste/2019.199
Sparf, M. (2021). “I am magic!”: Pupils’ engagement when designing in learning programming. Designs for Learning, 13(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.168
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Madeline T. Fernando

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.