Adult Migrants as SEND Learners: Reframing Inclusion in ESOL Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v4i1.6269Keywords:
Adult Migrants, ESOL, Inclusive Education, SEND Learners, Universal Design for Learning (UDL)Abstract
Overlapping challenges related to language acquisition, cultural adaptation, and diverse learning needs are some of the issues adult migrant learners face in English as a Second Language (ESOL) classrooms, which also include Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND). However, the area of inclusion in the adult ESOL provision is under theorised and understudied. The present paper explores the conceptualisation and practice of inclusion by ESOL professionals who teach adult migrants and provides a reformulated perspective to the conceptualisation and implementation of inclusion within the framework of Reframe- Redesign- Respond. Data was obtained through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations in adult learning centres in England through the qualitative research design. The results indicate that the concept of inclusion is a process and relational concept and not a policy construct. The concept of inclusion developed by practitioners is based on the idea of inclusion as an ethical promise grounded in empathy and recognition, aligning with the standards of Universal Design for Learning and trauma-informed pedagogy. Nonetheless, both institutional constraints (such as disjointed SEND policies, insufficient funding, and digital inequities) limit the ideal implementation of inclusive practices. The research arrives at the conclusion that not only the pedagogical innovation is necessary in inclusive ESOL provision but also structural reform and policy coherence. This study, by redefining inclusion as a relational, intersectional and transformative process, will help understand better how adult migrant education can be used to promote social justice and fair engagement in lifelong learning.
References
Ainscow, M. (2025). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: learning from international experiences. In A Research Agenda for Inclusive Education (pp. 147–162). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Amor, A. M., Hagiwara, M., Shogren, K. A., Thompson, J. R., Verdugo, M. Á., Burke, K. M., & Aguayo, V. (2019). International perspectives and trends in research on inclusive education: A systematic review. International journal of inclusive education, 23(12), 1277–1295.
AoC. (2025). Annual Conference and Exhibition. Association of College. https://www.aoc.co.uk/events-training/annualconference-exhibition
Barnes, N., Joyce, I., Chen, H., Clarke, S., & Sherman, H. (2025). The further education and skills teacher. In A Guide to the Diploma in Teaching and Related Qualifications (pp. 101–118). Routledge.
Benkirane, S., & Doucerain, M. M. (2022). Considering intersectionality in acculturation: Bringing theory to practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 91, 150–157.
Brown, J. L. (2025). Cultivating ‘inclusive pedagogy’in higher education: What are the beliefs, practices and professional development needs of educators? [The Open University].
Chamo, N., & Yarom-Cohen, T. (2025). Landscapes in the Professional Identity of Special Education Teachers: Perceptions and Practices Related to Universal Design for Learning (UDL).
Collins, P. H., da Silva, E. C. G., Ergun, E., Furseth, I., Bond, K. D., & Martínez-Palacios, J. (2021). Intersectionality as critical social theory: Intersectionality as critical social theory, Patricia Hill Collins, Duke University Press, 2019. Contemporary Political Theory, 20(3), 690.
Council, B. (2025). English for adults. https://www.britishcouncil.org/english/adults
Duda-Mikulin, E. A., & Głowacka, M. (2024). ‘I haven’t met one’: disabled EU migrants in the UK. Intersections between migration and disability post-Brexit. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(6), 1530–1548.
Education, D. F. (2022). Multiply: funding available to improve adult numeracy skills. gov.uk. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/multiply-funding-available-to-improve-numeracy-skills
Field, S. (2024). Inequality in English post-16 education. Oxford Open Economics, 3(Supplement_1), i828–i841.
Fields, L., Dean, B. A., Perkiss, S., & Moroney, T. (2022). Education on the Sustainable Development Goals for nursing students: Is Freire the answer? Nursing Inquiry, 29(4), e12493.
Flanagan, D. (2025). Neoliberal Governments, ESOL Provision and Wider Implications. TESOL Journal, 16(2), e70035.
Fleming, K. (2021). Exploring inclusive partnerships: parents, co-production, and the SEND code of practice (2015) [Sheffield Hallam University].
Florian, L. (2022). Learning Capacity is Not Fixed, It’s Open-Ended. In The Inclusion Dialogue (pp. 66–73). Routledge.
Gibson, P. (2025). Who Am I Teaching?: How a Better Understanding of Children Improves Primary Teaching and Learning. SAGE Publications Limited.
Equality Act 2010. (2010). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
Graham, S. (2022). Self-efficacy and language learning–what it is and what it isn’t. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186–207.
Institute, L. A. W. (2025). Learning and Work Institute. https://learningandwork.org.uk/
Kuneva, L., & Hough, K. L. (2023). Fostering inclusion for refugees and migrants and building trust in the digital public space. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(3), 412–423.
Lamb, B. (2025). Continuity and tensions between the SEND framework and disability rights legislation in recent legislative reforms. In Education, Disability and Social Policy (pp. 20–50). Policy Press.
Long, R., & Roberts, N. (2024). School attendance in England. House of Commons Library.
Makweya, P. P., & Sepadi, M. (2025). The crucial role of empathy in fostering inclusive learning environments. In Global Practices in Inclusive Education Curriculum and Policy (pp. 77–90). IGI Global.
Mathai, K. (2025). Establishing Foundational Principles for a Reading Comprehension Framework: A Qualitative study of teachers’ perspectives of Grade 4 Second Language Speakers in CBSE International Schools of Dubai Birmingham City University.
Migrants, T., Kiyokawa, J. M., & Island, H. (2023). The relationship between attention, dyslexia, and convergence insufficiency. International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities, 11(1), 1.
Morrice, L., Tip, L. K., Collyer, M., & Brown, R. (2021). ‘You can’t have a good integration when you don’t have a good communication’: English-language learning among resettled refugees in England. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 681–699.
Nash, A. (2025). ESOL in Troubled Times: Learner and Teacher Voice in English for Speakers of Other Languages at a Further Education College in England Birmingham City University.
Norwich, B. (2023). Addressing tensions and dilemmas in inclusive education: Resolving democratically. Routledge.
Ofsted. (2023). Five-Year Ofsted Inspection Data. gov.uk. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/five-year-ofsted-inspection-data
Pöyhönen, S., & Simpson, J. (2024). Adult migrants learning minority languages in Europe: An introduction. In Minority Language Learning for Adult Migrants in Europe (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
Rajak, K. K., & Dey, N. G. (2025). Differentiated Assessment Strategies: An Assessment Practice for Diverse Learners in the Inclusive Classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(1), 17–24.
Roski, M., Sebastian, R., Ewerth, R., Hoppe, A., & Nehring, A. (2024). Learning analytics and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A clustering approach. Computers & Education, 214, 105028.
Schiess-Jokanovic, J., Knefel, M., Kantor, V., Weindl, D., Schäfer, I., & Lueger-Schuster, B. (2021). Complex post-traumatic stress disorder and post-migration living difficulties in traumatised refugees and asylum seekers: the role of language acquisition and barriers. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), 2001190.
Sewell, A., Kennett, A., & Pugh, V. (2022). Universal Design for Learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(4), 364–378.
Sidaway, K. (2023). ‘Maybe I can tell to you my story…’: language learning motivation, identity and the needs of adult ESOL students in England University of Warwick.
Siegel, A. A., Zarb, M., Alshaigy, B., Blanchard, J., Crick, T., Glassey, R., Hott, J. R., Latulipe, C., Riedesel, C., & Senapathi, M. (2021). Teaching through a global pandemic: educational landscapes before, during and after COVID-19. In Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 1–25).
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2022). In it together: Teachers, researchers, and classroom SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 106(3), 635–650.
Tavares, V. (2022). Exploring the impact of notions of success based on native-speakerism, individualism and neoliberalism on ESL students’ identities. In Neoliberalization of English language policy in the global south (pp. 153–172). Springer.
Treanor, M., & Troncoso, P. (2023). Digital exclusion in education: What the online learning technology Scholar tells us about inequality in Scottish secondary schools.
Wang, S. H., Lang, N., Bunch, G. C., Basch, S., McHugh, S. R., Huitzilopochtli, S., & Callanan, M. (2021, July). Dismantling persistent deficit narratives about the language and literacy of culturally and linguistically minoritized children and youth: Counter-possibilities. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 6, p. 641796). Frontiers Media SA.
Watson, K. R., & Astor, R. A. (2025). A critical review of empirical support for trauma-informed approaches in schools and a call for conceptual, empirical and practice integration. Review of Education, 13(1), e70025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ozlem Isik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
