Exploring EFL Learners’ Attitudes Towards the Effectiveness of Recast vs. Explicit Corrective Feedback on Pronunciation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/jnll.v3i1.4162Keywords:
Attitudes, Explicit Corrective Feedback, Learners’ Perception, Oral Corrective Feedback, Perceived Usefulness, RecastAbstract
This study investigates learners’ attitudes towards the effectiveness of recast versus explicit feedback for pronunciation improvement. The data were collected through a semi-structured interview, with ten EFL pupils in their third year as undergraduates from the English department at Ibn Tofail University participating. The data were analyzed thematically to determine themes related to learners’ perceived usefulness of the oral feedback, namely recast and explicit feedback, and the type viewed to be of greater impact on pronunciation. The findings revealed that learners view both recast and explicit feedback as effective. The effectiveness of explicit feedback was attributed to its clarity, being less time-consuming and ability to highlight errors. For recast, its effectiveness was due to its implicitness, which does little to no harm to emotions. Concerning the type learners perceive to have a greater impact, most learners stated that explicit feedback is more effective due to its visibility, making them cautious of repeating mistakes, unlike recast which is sometimes difficult to realize as corrective. However, one learner went for recast, appreciating its gentle approach and expressing how explicit feedback could trigger stress, making learners focus on their embarrassing situation rather than fixing the error. Additionally, one learner highlighted personal preference as a determining factor in the perceived effectiveness of feedback types. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of feedback is closely related to attitudes. Therefore, teachers could employ corrective methods that are explicit enough while making sure they are not too obvious to avoid harming learners emotionally.
References
Alahmed, K. I., & Rakan, B. (2022). The Effect of Explicit Corrective Feedback on Improving the English Pronunciation of Iraqi Intermediate Graders. Journal of Basic Sciences, 7(12), 381-397. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/ecb72cdcb109948e
AlGhafri, M., Mirza, C., & Gabarre, C. (2023). Students’ attitudes towards oral corrective feedback: A case study from Oman. Arab World English Journal, 14(3), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.26
Alsolami, R. (2019). Effect of oral corrective feedback on language skills. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(6), 672-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0906.09
Ahangari, S. (2014). The Effect of Self, Peer and Teacher Correction on the Pronunciation Improvement of Iranian EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 81-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.1p.81
Baker, A. A. (2011). Discourse prosody and teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. TESOL Journal, 2(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2011.259955
Bao, R., & Wang, H. (2023). A comparison between the preferences for oral corrective feedback of teachers and students of Chinese as a second language. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112136
Couper, G. (2017). Teacher Cognition of Pronunciation Teaching: Teachers’ Concerns and Issues. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 820–843. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44984794
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A Research-Based Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486
Faqeih, H. I. (2015). Learners’ Attitudes towards Corrective Feedback. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 664–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.101
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th edition.). Longman.
Hendrickson, J. M. (1978). Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching: Recent Theory, Research, and Practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62(8), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/326176
Isaacs, T., & Harding, L. (2017). Pronunciation assessment. Language Teaching, 50(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000118
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932841
Hartono, D., Basthomi, Y., Widiastuti, O., & Prastiyowati, S. (2022). The Impacts of Teacher’s Oral Corrective Feedback to Students’ Psychological Domain:A Study on EFL Speech Production. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2152619
Karimi, L., & Esfandiari, N. (2016). The Effect of Recast vs. Explicit Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Stress Patterns Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(6), 1166. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0606.05
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Institute of English. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
Lambert, W. E. (1987). The effects of bilingual and bicultural experiences on children’s attitudes and social perspectives. In P. Homel, M. Palij, & D. Aaronson (Eds.), Childhood bilingualism: Aspects of linguistic, cognitive, and social development (pp. 197–221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263197001034
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
Mantle-bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: links to proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb01114.x
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817
Mufidah, Z. M. (2017). The Impact of oral corrective feedback on the level of language anxiety. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconelt-17.2018.48
Nguyen, L. T., Hung, B. P., Duong, U. T. T., & Le, T. T. (2021). Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about pronunciation instruction in Tertiary English as a foreign language education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739842
Oliver, R., & Adams, R. (2021). Oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics, pp. 187-206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.010
Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/329249
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2011). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263-300. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40264353
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x
Simpson, J. M. (2006). Feedback on writing: changing EFL students’ attitudes. TESL Canada Journal, 24(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v24i1.30
Stevick, E. (1976). Memory, Meaning, and Method. Rowley, Ma.: Newbury House.
Xu, C. (2009). Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 270–275. https://doi.org/10.6016/j.jslw.2009.05.005
Yu, W. (2022). Explicit vs. implicit corrective feedback: Which is more effective? In advances in social science, education and humanities research. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220401.123
Wang, W., & Li, S. (2020). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124
Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 El Ghazi Bougataia, Hind Brigui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.