Students’ Perception of the Interplay of Police Performance and Public Trust
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ijm.v2i1.3184Keywords:
Philippines, Police Performance, TrustAbstract
Effective policing relies on public trust and support. However, trust in law enforcement has declined in many communities—police performance factors like attentiveness, reliability, and responsiveness shape levels of public trust. The researchers surveyed 300 criminology students to analyze the relationship between police performance and public trust. Criminology students were chosen as the target group because they will soon be entering the field of law enforcement. Measures included police performance dimensions and indicators of public trust (procedural justice, effectiveness, values, integrity). Students rated police performance highly, especially responsiveness. Trust indicators were also high. Police attentiveness, reliability, and responsiveness correlate strongly with procedural justice, police effectiveness, values, and integrity. Further, Multiple Regression Analysis revealed that police performance significantly predicts public trust. Based on these findings, the researchers recommend: 1) providing comprehensive training programs for police officers focusing on community policing, communication skills, de-escalation, and bias awareness; 2) establishing strict monitoring systems and adopting a zero-tolerance policy towards misconduct; 3) evaluating police performance regularly through assessments and metrics; and 4) engaging communities through partnerships, meetings, and community policing initiatives. These recommendations aim to strengthen trust-based policing and support achieving U.N. Sustainable Development Goal 16 of encouraging peaceful and inclusive communities, ensuring equal access to justice for everyone, and constructing efficient, responsible, and inclusive organizations at every level.
References
Abril, C., Fernandez, M., & Garcia, R. (2022). Measuring public trust in the police: Development and validation of a new scale. Journal of Criminal Justice Research, 48(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101836
Architha, A. (2020). Development and Validation of Survey Questionnaire Experimental Data – A Systematical Review-based Statistical Approach. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/103996/
Ayalew, Y., Melesse, A. M., & Setegn, S. G. (2018). Evaluation of Three Different MLR Techniques in the Estimation of Daily Rainfall Distribution at the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Atmosphere, 9(5), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050180
Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage.
Muijs, D. (2010). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). Correlational research: When and how to use. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research/
Bennett, S. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
Braga, A. A. & Weisburd, D. L. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(3), pp.323-358.
Bradford, B. (2014). Why do ‘the law’ comply? Procedural justice, group identification and offender compliance. European Journal of Criminology, 11(1), 110-131.
Burgoon, J. K. (2015). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1-2), 30–48.
Chan, D. (2018). Public trust. World Scientific. https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/11258#t=aboutBook
Chakravartty, S. (2018, August 15). Expectancy disconfirmation theory. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/expectancy-disconfirmation-theory-sandeep-chakravartty
Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds.). (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of action research (Vols. 1-2). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406
Cook, K. S. (2015). Social exchange theory. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24053-X
Commoner. (2021, June 16). The Philippine National Police is broken beyond repair. Medium. https://mediacommoner.medium.com/the-philippine-national-police-is-broken-beyond-repair-d079fc4e30fc
Deegan, H., & Rankin, M. (1996). The legitimacy of institutions and authorities: A theoretical framework. Journal of Political Studies, 12(4), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00355.x
Dewiyanti, S. (2021, November 15). Legitimacy theory and its relationship to CSR. Accounting. https://accounting.binus.ac.id/2021/11/15/legitimacy-theory-and-its-relationship-to-csr/
Gau, J. M. (2014). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A test of measurement and structure. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 187-205.
Griffiths, C. T., & Winfree, L. T. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on police performance measurement. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (7th ed., pp. 349-365). Waveland Press.
Haberman, C. P. (2017). Overlapping experiments? Understanding the varying role of place in hot spots policing. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(2), 229-251.
Hurley, M. (2023). Mean. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books
Jackson, J. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051-1071.
Kochel, T. R. (2012). Can police legitimacy promote collective efficacy? Justice Quarterly, 29(3), 384-419.
Lee, H., & Vaughn, M. S. (2016). Service quality and citizen satisfaction with police: Evidence from a southeast Asian city-state. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(2), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-09-2015-0105
Lim, C. H., & Kwak, D. H. (2022). Factors influencing public trust in the police in South Korea: Focus on instrumental, expressive, and normative models. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440211068504.
Longley, R. (2022, October 14). What is procedural justice? ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-procedural-justice-5225379
Lum, C., & Nagin, D. S. (2017). Reinventing American policing. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 339–393. https://doi.org/10.1086/688462
Mazerolle, L. (2013). Shaping Citizen Perceptions of police legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245-274.
Mchomes, E. (2019). Understanding relationships: Correlational research design in social sciences. Journal of Social Science Research, 15(3), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.04.001
Melkamu, M. T., & Teshome, W. (2023). Public trust in the police: Investigating the influence of police performance, procedural fairness, and police-community relations in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2199559.
Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2011). Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr037
Murphy, K., & Barkworth, J. (2014). Victim willingness to report crime to police: Does procedural justice or outcome matter most? Victims & Offenders, 9(2), 178-204.
National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Finding and using health statistics. National Library of Medicine. https://www.nlm.nih.gov
OECD. (2021). Importance of values in building public trust. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/governance/ethics/importance-values-building-public-trust.htm
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Trust In Government. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/governance/trust-in-government/
Ord, B. (2020). Police legitimacy, effectiveness, and community cooperation. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1-30.
Pelayo, M., Montanio, M., & et al. (2019). Public perception on job performance of PNP personnel. Systems Plus College Foundation.
Peyton, K. & Rand, D. G. (2019). A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(40), 19894-19898.
Pickett, J. T., & Ryon, S. B. (2017). Procedurally just cooperation: Explaining support for due process reforms in policing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 9-17.
Prius, R. (2022, December 23). Police misconduct. Criminal Defense Lawyer. https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/police-misconduct.htm
Pryce, D. K., Johnson, D., & Maguire, E. R. (2017). Procedural justice, obligation to obey, and cooperation with police among immigrants. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(5), 697-719.
Quattlebaum, M. H., Murphy, K., & Cherney, S. (2018). Will it matter if they’re listening? A multi-level approach to the influence of police contacts and perceptions of procedural justice on public support for the police. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 45-59.
Rosenbaum, D. P., Maskaly, J., Lawrence, D. S., Escamilla, J. H., Enciso, G., Christoff, T. E., & Posick, C. (2017). The police-community interaction survey: Measuring police performance in new ways. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(1), 112-127.
Shakespeare, V. (2023). What is pilot testing and what are the benefits? Fuel Cycle. https://fuelcycle.com/blog/pilot-testing-how-it-can-improve-research/
Social Weather Stations. (2016). Public trust in the police: Survey results. Social Weather Stations.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2015). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513-548.
Tankebe, J. (2018). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: An empirical assessment of procedural justice, legitimacy, and perceived police corruption. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(4), 336-360.
Taylor, B., Higgins, G. E., & Pearson, C. (2019). Determinants of public trust in the police: A systematic review. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(2), 197-216.
Taylor, S. (2020, February 11). Regression analysis. Corporate Finance Institute. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/data-science/regression-analysis/
Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2020). What is known about the effectiveness of police practices in reducing crime and disorder? Annual Review of Criminology, 4, 427-451
The Justice Collaboratory. (n.d.). Procedural justice theory. Yale Law School. https://law.yale.edu/justice-collaboratory/procedural-justice
Thomas, L. (2023, December 18). Simple random sampling: Definition, steps, & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/simple-random-sampling/
Transparency and Justice Center (TJC). (n.d.). Fairness and transparency in law enforcement. Transparency and Justice Center.
Turney, S. (2023, June 22). Pearson correlation coefficient (r): Guide & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/pearson-correlation-coefficient/
UCLA. (n.d.). What does Cronbach’s alpha mean? UCLA Statistics. https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu
United Nations. (2021). The social contract and the role of public trust in enhancing the social contract. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2021/05/Policy-Brief_Social-Contract.pdf
U. S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Building trust. COPS Office. https://cops.usdoj.gov/buildingtrust
Wolfe, S. E., Coppotelli, H., & Lawson, E. P. (2018). Perceptions of police: race, community policing, and support for vigilante violence. Police quarterly, 21(4), 405-423.
Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. M. (2021). The Expectancy‐Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta‐analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13368
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Janodin A. Sumala, Jan Vincent L. Polison, Jhul Homer L. Denzon, Exequiel Jr. Gono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
