Carbon in the Canopy: An Aboveground Carbon Stock Assessment Using Remote Sensing and Forest Inventory Data of Reforested Sites in The City of Koronadal

Authors

  • Krizzel Jan A. Batislaon Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines
  • Keth Lorenz Corre Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines
  • Riz Jorich Franco Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines
  • Zamantha Janylle Funa Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines
  • Dannah Mae Pagod Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines
  • Janne Paulo Panzo Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines
  • Mia Joy A. Inocencio Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines
  • Carlos F. Gaygay Jr. Notre Dame of Marbel University – Integrated Basic Education Department Senior High School, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ijfe.v2i1.7697

Keywords:

Aboveground Biomass, Carbon Sequestration, Climate Change Mitigation, Tree Diversity, Vegetation Cover

Abstract

Reforestation is an important component to mitigate climate change because trees absorb carbon from the air and store it in their biomass. But even though people know that reforestation is good for the environment, there isn’t enough local data on how much carbon is stored in these areas, which makes it hard to tell how well they work to fight climate change. This study helped to fix the deficiency of local carbon stock data in reforested areas within the City of Koronadal by employing forest inventory data and remote sensing techniques. The study employed a quantitative research design that integrated field-based forest measurements with remote sensing analysis. NDVI results showed a positive relationship with field data, indicating that remote sensing is a useful tool in measuring NDVI. Measurements were done on tree species, diameter at breast height (DBH), height, and wood density in 200 m perimeter Barangay San Isidro, Barangay Assumption and Barangay San Jose. Allometric equations were used to determine aboveground biomass, which was further transformed into carbon stock according to IPCC. The Landsat 9 satellite images were provided in QGIS and used to compute the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and to evaluate vegetation cover. The findings indicate a difference between the sites with Barangay San Jose (0.16 t C/ha) and Barangay Assumption (NDVI 0.50) having higher biomass and carbon stock which are dominated mainly by Swietenia macrophylla (Mahogany) for monitoring forest biomass. The findings provide baseline information that can help local government units improve forest management such as the National Greening Program and support climate change mitigation efforts.

References

Abarquez, A., Bush, D., Ata, J., Tolentino, E. L., & Gilbero, D. (2015). Early growth and genetic variation of Swietenia macrophylla in Northern Mindanao, Philippines. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 27(3), 314–321.

Addawe, J. C., Juayong, R. A. B., & Caro, J. D. L. (2024). Prediction of dengue outbreak periods using machine learning. In Atlantis Highlights in Computer Sciences (pp. 380–394). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-582-7_26

Anderson, S., Knapp, B., & Kabrick, J. (2023). Stand-density effects on carbon dynamics in Pinus and Quercus forests. Forest Science, 69(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxac061

Anees, S. A., Mehmood, K., Khan, W. R., Sajjad, M., Alahmadi, T. A., Alharbi, S. A., & Luo, M. (2024). Machine learning and remote sensing for biomass estimation. Ecological Informatics, 82, 102732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102732

Asmussen, M. V., Rubilar, R., Bozo, D., Alzamora, R. M., Elissetche, J. P., Pincheira, M., & Jara, O. (2025). Carbon stock and stand production relationships. Sustainability, 17(8), 3614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083614

Beniušienė, L., Mozgeris, G., Jonikavičius, D., Jurkšienė, G., Šilinskas, B., & Beniušis, R. (2025). Stand density effects on forest health. Forests, 16(10), 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16101606

Bera, D., Chatterjee, N. D., Dinda, S., Ghosh, S., Dhiman, V., Bashir, B., Kumar, P., & Sharma, R. (2024). Carbon sequestration dynamics in forest ecosystems. Land, 13(10), 1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101689

Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D., Fölster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., Lescure, J.-P., Nelson, B. W., Ogawa, H., Puig, H., Riéra, B., & Yamakura, T. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x

Cheng, F., Ou, G., Wang, M., & Liu, C. (2024). Remote sensing estimation of forest carbon stock. Forests, 15(4), 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040681

Dahy, B., Issa, S., Ksiksi, T., & Saleous, N. (2020). Geospatial methods for carbon stock assessment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 540(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012036

Fleishman, E., Noss, R. F., & Noon, B. R. (2006). Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning. Ecological Indicators, 6(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.07.005

Harris, N. L., Gibbs, D. A., Baccini, A., Birdsey, R. A., de Bruin, S., Farina, M., Fatoyinbo, T., Hansen, M. C., Herold, M., Houghton, R. A., Potapov, P. V., Suarez, D. R., Roman-Cuesta, R. M., Saatchi, S. S., Slay, C. M., Turubanova, S. A., & Tyukavina, A. (2021). Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nature Climate Change, 11(3), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC.

Israel, R., Akintunde-Alo, D. A., & Oluwajuwon, T. V. (2025). Landsat vegetation indices for biomass estimation. Discover Forests, 1(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44195-025-00015-7

Lasco, R. D., & Pulhin, F. B. (2003). Philippine forest ecosystems and climate change: Carbon stocks, rate of sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol. Annals of Tropical Research, 25(2), 37–51.

Ma, J., Zhang, W., Ji, Y., Huang, J., Huang, G., & Wang, L. (2023). Biomass estimation using LiDAR. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1176523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1176523

Ma, T., Zhang, C., Ji, L., Zuo, Z., Beckline, M., Hu, Y., Chen, A., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Biomass estimation challenges and advances. Ecological Indicators, 159, 111653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111653

Matiza, C., Mutanga, O., Peerbhay, K., Odindi, J., & Lottering, R. (2024). Biomass estimation in urban landscapes. Journal of Spatial Science, 69(3), 1047–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2023.2184839

Menyailo, O. V., Sobachkin, R. S., Makarov, M. I., & Cheng, C.-H. (2022). Soil organic matter dynamics in forests. Forests, 13(2), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020284

Ojeda, M. N., Jang, M., Park, D., & Kang, H. (2024). Carbon stock estimation in Mt. Arayat. Forest Science and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2024.2337654

Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C. J., & Stenseth, N. C. (2005). Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011

Pragasan, L. A. (2016). Carbon stock of tree vegetation in India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 14(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1402_169183

Raihan, A., Begum, R. A., Mohd Said, M. N., & Pereira, J. J. (2021). Carbon stock and emission reduction through forest conservation in Malaysia. Forests, 12(10), 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101294

Salmo, S. G., Manalo, S. B., Jacob, P. B., Gerona-Daga, M. E. B., Naputo, C. F. P., Maramag, M. W. A., Acma, F. M., & Tibbetts, I. R. (2024). Soil carbon in mangroves. Carbon Balance and Management, 19, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00263-4

Salunkhe, O. R., Valvi, G. R., Singh, S., Rane, G. M., Khan, M. L., Saxena, V., Chaturvedi, R. K., & Raghubanshi, A. S. (2023). Forest carbon stock estimation approaches. Carbon Research, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-023-00012-8

Stein, Z. (2023). Carbon stock and climate mitigation strategies.

Tacconi, L., Boscolo, M., & Brack, D. (2003). Illegal forest activities policy report. Center for International Forestry Research.

Tsedeke, R. E., Dawud, S. M., & Tafere, S. M. (2021). Carbon stock in agroforestry systems. Environmental Systems Research, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-021-00224-5

United Nations. (n.d.). Climate change. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/climate-change

Vicharnakorn, P., Shrestha, R., Nagai, M., Salam, A., & Kiratiprayoon, S. (2014). Carbon stock assessment using remote sensing and forest inventory data in Savannakhet, Lao PDR. Remote Sensing, 6(6), 5452–5479. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6065452

Zhou, X., Hu, C., & Wang, Z. (2023). Biomass and carbon density in forests. Global Ecology and Conservation, 48, e02707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02707

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

Batislaon, K. J. A. ., Corre, K. L. ., Franco, R. J. ., Funa, Z. J. ., Pagod, D. M. ., Panzo, J. P. ., Inocencio, M. J. A. ., & Gaygay Jr., C. F. . (2026). Carbon in the Canopy: An Aboveground Carbon Stock Assessment Using Remote Sensing and Forest Inventory Data of Reforested Sites in The City of Koronadal. International Journal of Forestry and Ecosystem, 2(1), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.54536/ijfe.v2i1.7697

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.