Comparative Effectiveness of Indirect and Direct Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in Science Instruction

Authors

  • Lilibeth G. Abrogena Mariano Marcos State University, College of Teacher Education A. Castro Avenue, 2900 Laoag City, Philippines
  • Natividad E. Lorenzo Mariano Marcos State University, College of Teacher Education A. Castro Avenue, 2900 Laoag City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i3.1666

Keywords:

Indirect Interaction, Direct Interaction, Interaction Patterns, Science Concepts, Science Process Skills

Abstract

Using an experimental research design, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of indirect and direct teacher-student interaction patterns in the acquisition of science concepts and science process skills of two matched groups of the first year Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) students of the Mariano Marcos State University College of Teacher Education. Both groups were pre- and post-tested using science concepts and science process skills tests. Mean was used to describe the performance of the students in both tests. The t-test was used to determine the significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean scores of the two groups. Results of the t-test showed no significant difference in the pretest mean scores of both tests while in the posttest, the indirect interaction group performed satisfactorily as compared to the direct interaction group where there were students who performed fairly in both tests. Thus, the t-score of the indirect interaction group was significantly higher than that of the direct interaction group. Indirect teaching is therefore more effective than direct teaching in the students’ acquisition of science concepts and science process skills. Thus, it should be given emphasis for the effective acquisition of science concepts and science process skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antonio, V. V. (2018). Science Laboratory Interest and Preferences of Teacher Education Students: Implications to Science Teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 57-67. 2350-7756 Retrieved from http://www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/APJMR-2018.6.3.08a.pdf

Batuyong, C. T., & Antonio, V. V. (2018). Exploring the Effect of PhET Interactive Simulation-Based Activities on Students’ Performance and Learning Experiences in Electromagnetism. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 121-131. Retrieved online from https://oaji.net/articles/2017/1543-1536135372.pdf

Calzada, M. P. T., & Antonio, V. V. (2023). Development of Technology-Enhanced Lessons in Optics (TELO). American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 2(3), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i3.1599

Carin, A. A. and Sund, R. B. (1975). Teaching Science Through Discovery. 3rd ed. Columbos, Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing Co.

Dunton, J. B., & Co, W. S. (2019). Spiral Progression Approach in Teaching Science and the Performance of Learners in District I, Capiz., Journal of Physics, 1254(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012045

Esguerra, D.J. (2018). DepED urged to lighten teacher workloads following suicide reports. Philippine Daily Inqurer. August 27. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1025288/deped-urged-to-lighten-teacher-workloads-following-suicide-reports http://www.sciepub.com/reference/361869

Gregorio, H. C. (1976). Principles and Methods of Teaching. R. P. Garcia Publishing Co.

Magnaye, L. J. (2022). Pedagogical and Research Competence of the Pre-service Teachers. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 1(3), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i3.391

Navarro, A. M. (2022). School Infrastructure in the Philippines: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Be Heading? ideas.repec.org. https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2022-10.html

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. D. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Paris, J. (2019). Philippines Ranks Among Lowest in Reading, Math, and Science in 2018 study. https://www.rappler.com/nation/246422-philippines-ranking-reading-math-science-pisa-study-2018

Ruutmann, T. & Kipper, H. (2011). Teaching Strategies for Direct and Indirect Instruction in Teaching Engineering. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v1i3.1805

Soriano, J., & Vargas, D. (2021). Adequacy of Instructional Materials and Facilities for the Implementation of K-12 Basic Education Program. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3813237

Singh, A (2021). Importance of Science Education in Schools. The Asian School Publishing

Sshana, Z. J., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science practical work and its impact on students’ science achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.888

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Lilibeth, G. A., & Natividad, E. L. (2023). Comparative Effectiveness of Indirect and Direct Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in Science Instruction. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 2(3), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v2i3.1666