Investigating the Impact of Information Communication Technology (ICT) Illiteracy Levels on the Academic Performance of First-Year Students: A Case of Emmanuel University

Authors

  • Makarios Kizito Chimowa Faculty of Education, Emmanuel University, P.O. Box 30583, Lilongwe, Malawi
  • Paul Muotcha Faculty of Education, Emmanuel University, P.O. Box 30583, Lilongwe, Malawi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.2726

Keywords:

Information Communication Technology, University Standards, Illiteracy Levels, Academic Performance

Abstract

Information Communication Technology (ICT), gives University students a better understanding of how an academic work should be presented and submitted for assignments, exercises, examinations, research work and others. The impact of ICT on students’ academic performance in early stages of University Education includes benefits like developing the ability to use the University’s academic standards of writing or presenting class work or assignments, seminars, and also research-related presentations. The benefits of using ICT outweigh its challenges once one acquires the skill, though society may view the use of ICT as unattainable. This study investigated the impact of Information Communication Technology (ICT) illiteracy levels on the academic performance of first year students at Emmanuel University. Based on SDT, ICT Engagement Theory, it is suggested that students’ interests, positive social interactions, autonomy and competence related to ICT increase their intrinsic motivation. This enables them to challenge themselves with self-driven technology use, which can generate conditions conducive to optimal academic performance. Results of the study revealed that lack of knowledge in ICT affects the academic performance of first year university students in many ways. The study recommends that universities should focus on adequately orienting or training first year students in the use of various types of ICT and encourage that they keep practicing the skill to become more skillful and experienced.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aziz, A. & Naz, A. (2019), The impact of digital Literacy on the academic performance of first year students in Packstani University. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(2), 27-34.

Baugh, J. M (2004). Assessment of spreadsheet and database student. Information Systems Education journal.

Bawa, P. (2016). The digital divide and its impact on first year college students. Journal of College Students Development, 57(5), 620626.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology and Society, 13, 63-73.

Dormant, S. M. (2000). Implications of growing up digital. Review of Tapscotts Growing up digital.

Esen, B. K., & Gundogdu, M. (2010). The Relationship between Internet Addiction, peer pressure and perceived social support among adolescents. The International Journal of Educational Researchers, 2(1), 29-36.

Frederick, G. R., Schweizer, H. & Lowe, R. (2006). After the in-service course: Challenges of technology integration, Computers in the

Garrison, D. R., Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7.

John, A., Bargh, G. Katelyn, Y. A. Mckenna (2004). The Internet and Social Life. NewYork: Lawrence Erlbaun Associates Publishers.

Kent, N. & Facer, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people’s home and school ICT use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 440-455. https://www.academia.edu/download/30257689/jcal_different_worlds_paper.pdf

Koc, M. (2005). Implications of learning theories for effective technology integration and preservice teacher training: A critical literature review, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2, 2-18. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/download/51/21/

Kraute, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (2008). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological wellbeing? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.

Lee, J. (2010). The effects of Computer Literacy on Student Achievement and Retention in online learning courses. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(8), 19-28.

Levin, T. & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 417-44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ768874.pdf

Liu Z (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: changes in reading behaviour over the past 10 years. J. Doc., 61(6) 700-12.

Morahan-Martin, J. (1999). Women and Internet: promise and perils. Cyber Psychology and Behaviour, 3(5), 683-696.

Lowther, D. L. et al. (2008). Does technology integration work when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45, 195-213. https://www .memphis.edu/crep/pdfs/publications/does_tech_integration_work_accessible_4_4_18.pdf

Lu, Z., Hou, L & Huang, X. (2010). A Research on a student-centered teaching model in an ICT based English audio-video speaking lass. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 6, 101-123. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42381/article_42381.pdf

Morgan, C.T., 1956. An introduction to Psychology. McGraw-Hill book Co. Inc. N.Y., USA.

Ogbonnaya, N. I. (1997). Teachers’ perception of the management and maintenance of instructional materials in secondary schools. Health Movement Education Journal I. (1), 135-143.

Omogie, I. (1990). Problems of integrating educational technology into teachers’ education in Nigeria. Review of Education 2, 26 – 34.

Onyeachu, J. A. (2006). Integration of ICT(s) in teaching and distance learning in Nigeria. A paper presented at 16th annual national conference of Technological Writers Association of Nigeria (TEWAN) and faculty of education, Abia State University, Utur

Ramirez E. (2003). The impact of the Internet on the reading practices of a university community: the case of UNAM”, Proceedings of the 69th IFLA General Conferences and Council, available at: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/09e-Ramirez.pdf.

Reid, S., (2002). The integration of ICT into classroom teaching. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 48, 30-46. https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=edu_fac

Schumacher, P. & MorahanMartin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and Experience. Computer and Human Behaviour., 17(1), 5-110.

Watts-Taffe, S., Gwinn, C. B. & Horn, M. L., (2003). Preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology with the elementary literacy program. The Reading Teacher, 57, 130-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205332

Yildirim, S., (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: A review of teachers’ ICT use and barriers to integration, International Journal of Instructional Media, 34, 17. https://users.metu.edu.tr/soner/InternationalJournals/8.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-07-11

How to Cite

Chimowa, M. K., & Muotcha , P. (2024). Investigating the Impact of Information Communication Technology (ICT) Illiteracy Levels on the Academic Performance of First-Year Students: A Case of Emmanuel University. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(3), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.2726