Assessing Coastal Ecological Vulnerability to Sea-Level Rise in the Manokin Watershed: A Ridge Regression Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajdsai.v2i2.7233Keywords:
Ecological Vulnerability, Manokin Watershed, Maryland’s Eastern Shore, Ridge Regression, Sea-Level RiseAbstract
Coastal wetlands of the Mid-Atlantic United States face increasing risks from sea-level rise (SLR), storm surge, and saltwater intrusion, yet spatially explicit, multivariate assessments of ecological vulnerability remain scarce. This study analyzes 400 synthetic habitat vulnerability units across four subareas and seven habitat types within the Manokin Watershed on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. This study characterizes the biophysical landscape using descriptive statistics for 12 continuous environmental variables and key categorical attributes, highlighting differences among habitat types and subareas. Ridge Regression is then applied to model the ecological Vulnerability Index (VI) using 13 biophysical predictors, with emphasis on the influence of projected 2050 SLR. The model attains a 10 fold cross validated R² of 1.00 (RMSE = 3.61 × 10⁻⁸, p < .001), confirming that the VI is essentially a linear combination of its component metrics. The Exposure Index (β = 0.040, z = 31.07, p < .001) and Sensitivity Index (β = 0.030, z = 31.27, p < .001) are the strongest direct predictors, while Adaptive Capacity (β = −0.010) and Ecological Resilience (β = −0.008) provide significant buffering effects. SLR 2050 is statistically significant but functions mainly as an indirect driver through its contribution to exposure. Results indicate that enhancing ecological resilience, shoreline protection, and surrounding conservation areas may reduce vulnerability more effectively than habitat unit scale SLR mitigation efforts.
References
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bilkovic, D. M., & Mitchell, M. M. (2013). Ecological tradeoffs of stabilized salt marshes as a shoreline protection strategy: Effects of artificial hardening on macroinvertebrate assembly. Ecological Engineering, 61, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.011
Boon, J. D., Brubaker, J. M., & Forrest, D. R. (2010). Chesapeake Bay land subsidence and sea level change: An evaluation of past and present trends and future outlook. Virginia institute of marine science, special report, no. 425 in applied marine science and ocean engineering, william & mary. retrieved : https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blog/sramsoe425.pdf
Borchert, S. M., Osland, M. J., Enwright, N. M., & Griffith, K. T. (2018). Coastal wetland adaptation to sea level rise: Quantifying potential for landward migration and coastal squeeze. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(6), 2876–2887. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2664.13169
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Craft, C., Clough, J., Ehman, J., Joye, S., Park, R., Pennings, S., Guo, H., & Machmuller, M. (2009). Forecasting the effects of accelerated sea-level rise on tidal marsh ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1890/070219
Ezer, T., & Corlett, W. B. (2012). Is sea level rise accelerating in the Chesapeake Bay? A demonstration of a novel new approach for analyzing sea level data. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(19), L19605. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053435
Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451
Gain, A. K., Giupponi, C., & Renaud, F. G. (2012). Climate change adaptation and vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in developing countries: A generalized framework and a feasibility study in Bangladesh. Water, 4(2), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.3390/w4020345
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1267351
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Kirwan, M. L., & Megonigal, J. P. (2013). Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature, 504(7478), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12856
Najjar, R. G., Walker, H. A., Anderson, P. J., Barron, E. J., Bord, R. J., Gibson, J. R., Kennedy, V. S., Knight, C. G., Megonigal, J. P., O’Connor, R. E., Polsky, C. D., Psuty, N. P., Richards, B. A., Sorenson, L. G., Steele, E. M., & Swanson, R. S. (2000). The potential impacts of climate change on the mid-Atlantic coastal region. Climate Research, 14(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00014
Schepers, L., Kirwan, M., Guntenspergen, G., & Temmerman, S. (2017). Spatio-temporal development of vegetation die-off in a submerging coastal marsh. Limnology and Oceanography, 62(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10381
Stevens, R. A., Shull, S., Carter, J., Bishop, E., Herold, N., Riley, C. A., & Wasson, K. (2023). Marsh migration and beyond: A scalable framework to assess tidal wetland resilience and support strategic management. PLoS One. 6;18(11):e0293177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293177.
Tate, E. (2012). Social vulnerability indices: A comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069- 012-0152-2
Temmerman, S., Meire, P., Bouma, T. J., Herman, P. M. J., Ysebaert, T., & De Vriend, H. J. (2013). Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature, 504(7478), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12859
Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 58(1), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517- 6161.1996.tb02080.x
Titus, J. G., & Narayanan, V. K. (1995). The probability of sea level rise. U.S. Environmental protection agency, EPA 230-R-95-008, 197 pages. Retrieved from: https://research.fit.edu/media/site-specific/researchfitedu/coast-climate-adaptation- library/united-states/national/us---epa-reports/Titus--Narayanan.-1995.-US-Probability-of-SLR.pdf
Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N.,
Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., & Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–8079. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231335100
Vafeidis, A. T., Schuerch, M., Wolff, C., Spencer, T., Merkens, J. L., Hinkel, J., Lincke, D., Brown, S., & Nicholls, R. J. (2019). Water-level attenuation in global-scale assessments of exposure to coastal flooding: A sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 19(5), 973–984. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-973-2019
Wasson, K., Woolfolk, A., & Fresquez, C. (2019). Ecotones as indicators of changing environmental conditions: Rapid migration of salt marsh-upland boundaries. Estuaries and Coasts, 36(3), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9632-9
Williams, S. J. (2013). Sea-level rise implications for coastal regions. Journal of Coastal Research, 63(sp1), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI63-015.1
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 67(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9868.2005.00503.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Catherine Ngo, Orson Chi, Yeong Nain Chi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
