Pre-Service Teachers’ Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs and Procedural Fluency in Rational Expressions

Authors

  • Reny Jean A. Valencia College of Teacher Education, University of Mindanao, Philippines
  • Anna Mae B. Pal College of Teacher Education, University of Mindanao, Philippines
  • Glorybave D. Manog College of Teacher Education, University of Mindanao, Philippines
  • Exequiel Jr. Gono College of Teacher Education, University of Mindanao, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v4i1.6059

Keywords:

Davao City, Education, Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs, Personal Teaching Efficacy, Pre-Service Teachers, Procedural Fluency, Rational Expressions

Abstract

Procedural fluency, a vital component of mathematical proficiency, involves the ability to apply mathematical procedures efficiently and accurately. Despite its importance, research indicates that pre-service teachers struggle with procedural fluency, particularly in topics like rational expressions. Therefore, this study examines the relationship between pre-service teachers’ mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs and their procedural fluency in rational expressions. A descriptive-correlational design was employed in this study, and an adapted questionnaire was utilized to measure the MTEB of 176 pre-service teachers from private institutions in the Davao region, along with a test paper to assess their procedural fluency. Data were analysed using the mean, standard deviation, and Spearman’s Rho. Results show that pre-service teachers have a high level of MTEB and a very low level of procedural fluency. Correspondingly, the findings revealed that the overall beliefs in teaching mathematics has a weak negative correlation to procedural fluency, however, specific aspects of rational expressions are connected to their confidence in teaching and their expectations. Hence, it is crucial for pre-service teachers to be provided with interventions that will improve their ability to apply mathematical procedure accurately and efficiently.

References

Akendita, P. A., Arthur, Y. D., & Asare, B. (2025). Moderating effect of teacher efficacy on the relationship between students’ perception of mathematics and students’ mathematics achievement. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 6(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202528932

Ali Al-Mutawah, M., Thomas, R., Mahmoud, E.Y. & Fateel, M.J. (2019). Conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge and problem-solving skills in mathematics: High school graduates work analysis and standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273

Altarawneh, A. & Marei, S. (2021). Mathematical proficiency and pre-service classroom teacher’s instructional performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 354-364. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.354.364

Andal, S. G. & Andrade, R. (2022). Exploring students’ procedural fluency and written adaptive reasoning skills in solving open-ended problems. International Journal of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 2(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.53378/352872

Aytekin, C. and Sahiner, Y. (2020). An investigation of preservice mathematics teachers’ teaching processes about “procedural and conceptual knowledge” related to division with fractions. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 19(2), 958-981. http://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.695840

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bjerke, A. H., & Xenofontos, C. (2023). Teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching mathematics: tracing possible changes from teacher education to professional practice, Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2219982

Blitzer, R. (2022). Algebra and trigonometry, 7th edition. Pearson education. ISBN 978-0-13-692217-9

Byrd, K. and Giles, R. M. (2023). Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching mathematics. Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators, 32(1), 1068-1752. https://tinyurl.com/5xcdwv92

Chirove, M. (2023). Secondary School Learners’ Self-Efficacy and Achievement in Non-Routine Mathematics Problem-Solving. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 508-521. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v4i3.321

Dejoras, A. W. A., & Vistro-Yu, C. P. (2023). Investigating pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ mathematics proficiency and critical citizenship in the design of social-issue-themed mathematics online lessons. Southeast Asian Conference on Education Official Conference Proceedings, 537–550. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2435-5240.2023.44

Department of Education (2020). DepEd Order No. 031, s. 2020: Interim guidelines for assessment and grading in light of the basic education learning continuity plan. https://www.deped.gov.ph

DepEd (2021). General mathematics quarter 1 – module 6: Solving rational equations and inequalities. Alternative Delivery Mode. https://tinyurl.com/r47464jw

Devi, B., Lepcha, N. & Basnet, S. (2023). Application of correlational research design in nursing and medical research. Xi’an Shiyou Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University, 65(11), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YRZ68

Dua, C. C. R., Mancera, A. C., Solis, Y. J. R., Pentang, J. T., & Bautista, R. M. (2022). Preservice teachers’ self-concept, self-efficacy, and attitude: Its implications to mathematics achievement. Studies in Technology and Education, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v1i1.22

Enoch’s, L.G., Smith, P.L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the Mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17256.x

Essuman, I. B., Avorkpo, E. & Kwakye, D. (2024). An analysis of pre-service mathematics teachers’ performance in algebraic expressions. Sociology International Journal, 8(2), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2024.08.00379

Hasanah, A. N., & Yulianti, K. (2020). Error analysis in solving prism and pyramid problems. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1521(3), 032035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032035

Heddens, J. W. & Speer, W. R. (2000). Today’s mathematics.Wiley.

Hendricks, W., Olawale, B. E., & Saddiq, K. (2024). An investigation of high school preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching mathematics. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111262

Hitchison, D., Bergman, B., & Hoelzle, L. (2000). Elementary and Intermediate Algebra

Hosseinzadeh, M. & Moosavinejad, M. (2023). Elementary school teachers’ math teaching efficacy beliefs and job motivation: A correlational study. Iranian Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 41-51. http//doi.org/10.52547/ijer.2.2.41

Houichi, A., & Sarnou, D. (2020). Cognitive Load Theory and its Relation to Instructional Design: Perspectives of Some Algerian University Teachers of English. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8

Hourigan, M. & Leavy, A. M. (2022). Pre-service primary teachers’ mathematics teaching efficacy on entry to initial teacher education. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.3.1.17

Inayah, S., Septian, A., & Suwarman, R. F. (2020). Student Procedural fluency in Numerical Method subjects. Desimal Jurnal Matematika, 3(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v3i1.5316

Kaitera, S., & Harmoinen, S. (2022). Developing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary school by using visual representations on heuristics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1696

Kartal, B. (2020). Mathematics teachers’ teaching efficacy beliefs and attitudes toward teaching: A partial correlation research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(9), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n9.3

Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Impact of children’s math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 1-14. Article 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103096

Keazer, L. & Phaiah, J. (2023). Analyzing prospective elementary teachers’ evidence of conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 15(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2022.2139112

Lyman, A.L. (2022). Procedural fluency in mathematics: Exploring elementary teachers’ knowledge, understanding, and application in classroom practices. Kansas State University, 1-196. https://tinyurl.com/5bvbtfrz

Mendez, M.J., Nacional, A., Quilos, D., & Salva, L.H.M. (2023). Home environmental factors and science anxiety affecting academic performance of pre-service science teachers. SEAQUIS Journal of Science Education, 3(01), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.58249/sjse.v3i01.70

Mohammed, A. A. (2024). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ attitudes towards problem-solving in mathematics education. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajiri.v3i3.3264

Mohamoud, O. (2022). The effect of daily fluency on algebraic procedural fluency in students. Dissertations, Theses, and Projects, 743, 1-47. https://tinyurl.com/4f8p42ys

Murphy, C. B. (2021). Stratified random sampling: Advantages and disadvantages. Investopedia. https://tinyurl.com/yc4rkppb

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM], (2020). Standards for the preparation of middle-level mathematics teachers. https://tinyurl.com/4e8rkkk3

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2023). Procedural Fluency. https://tinyurl.com/223t2pj6

Novita, R., Herman, T., Dasari, D., & Putra, M. (2022). Analyzing second-year university students’ rational number understanding: A case on interpreting & representing fraction. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1747-1762. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1747

Olawale, B.E. & Hendricks, W. (2024). Mathematics teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and its relationship with teaching practices. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 20(1), em2392. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14123

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1

Pandee, M., Tepsuriwong, S. & Darasawang, P. (2020). The dynamic state of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy: a critical incident study in Thailand. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1442-1462. https://tinyurl.com/e7rcxnev

Pelayo, E. O., Lomibao, L. S., & Tan, R. G. (2023). Conceptual understanding vs. procedural fluency: a literature review on the mathematics teacher’s emphasis in teaching of rational algebraic expressions. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.12691/jitl-3-1-10

Pentang, J., Andrade, L. J., Golben, J., Talua, J., Bautista, R., Sercenia, J., Permatasari, D., Bucad, M. J., & Viernes, M. D. (2024). Problem-solving difficulties, performance, and differences among preservice teachers in Western Philippines University. The Palawan Scientist, 16(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.69721/tps.j.2024.16.1.07

Perera, H. & John, J. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for teaching math: Relations with teacher and student outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101842

Powell, S. R., Gilbert, J. K., & Fuchs, L. S. (2019). Variables influencing algebra performance: Understanding rational numbers is essential. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101758

Ramirez, I.S. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ perceived level of teaching skills. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 6(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v6i1.222

Ryve, A., & Hemmi, K. (2019). Educational policy to improve mathematics instruction at scale: conceptualizing contextual factors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09887-6

Salifu, A. S. (2021). Pre-Service Teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of rational numbers in E. P. College of Education, Bimbilla, Ghana. Education Journal, 10(4), 126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.13

Sanchez, L.C. & Falle, T. A. (2022). Difficulties encountered by junior high school on the simplification of rational expressions in Zambales, Philippines. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 03(11), 2582-6832. https://tinyurl.com/4aj2caud

Schmitz, A. (2012). Beginning Algebra: Rational Expressions and Equations. 2012 Book Archive, 1077-1255. https://tinyurl.com/ye2yk3b7

Schulz, A. (2023). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27, 981-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7

Segarra, J., Julià, C., & Valls, C. (2021). Pre-Service teachers’ belief about the efficacy of their Mathematics teaching: A Case Study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11236

Segarra, J. & Julià, C. (2022). Mathematics teaching efficacy belief and attitude of pre-service teachers and academic achievement. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11381. https://tinyurl.com/55a7zkcy

Steinhorst D. (2022). Structural reasoning with rational expressions. Theses and Dissertations. 9801. https://tinyurl.com/37akfp7h

Svensson, C., & Holmqvist, M. (2021). Pre-Service teachers’ procedural and conceptual understanding of pupils’ mean value knowledge in Grade 6. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0649. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11067

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Thomson, M. M., Walkowiak, T. A., Whitehead, A. N., and Huggins, E. (2020). Mathematics teaching efficacy and developmental trajectories: A mixed-methods investigation of novice K-5 teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102953

Twohill, A., NicMhuirí, S., Harbison, L., and Karakolidis, A. (2023). Primary preservice teachers’ mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs: The role played by mathematics attainment, educational level, preparedness to teach, and gender. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10259-5

Velez, A. J. B., & Abuzo, E. P. (2024). Mathematics self-efficacy and motivation as predictors of problem-solving skills of students. TWIST, 19(1), 417-430. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9317-2353

Wang, Q. & Xue, M. (2022). The implications of expectancy-value theory of motivation in language education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 992372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992372

Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

Valencia, R. J. A. ., Pal, A. M. B. ., Manog, G. D. ., & Gono, E. . J. . (2026). Pre-Service Teachers’ Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs and Procedural Fluency in Rational Expressions. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 4(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v4i1.6059

Similar Articles

41-50 of 74

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.