Applying UDL to Blended Learning: A Case Study of The Latin American Literature Course

Authors

  • Phan Duy Khoi Linguistics and Literature Department, HCMC University of Education, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Thanh Trung Linguistics and Literature Department, HCMC University of Education, Vietnam
  • Nguyen Thanh Tuan Linguistics and Literature Department, HCMC University of Education, Vietnam
  • Võ Kim Ngoan Linguistics and Literature Department, HCMC University of Education, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v3i2.4617

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Digital Transformation, Higher Education, Latin American Literature, Universal Design for Learning (UDL)

Abstract

This article was conducted in the context of modern education, which demands flexibility and diverse approaches to meet students’ learning needs, particularly during the era of digital transformation and post-pandemic recovery. The study employs three main methods: (1) theoretical research to establish a scientific foundation for UDL (Universal Design for Learning) and blended learning; (2) an experimental method to design, implement, and evaluate a teaching model applying UDL to the Latin American Literature module; and (3) a sociological survey method using questionnaires and interviews to gather feedback from students and lecturers on the model’s effectiveness. The predicted results suggest that applying UDL will enhance interactivity, engagement, and comprehension among students in a blended learning environment. The significance of the study lies in providing a practical framework for integrating UDL into higher education in Vietnam, contributing to improved teaching quality. Initial research findings confirm that this model is not only feasible but also yields positive outcomes in personalizing learning experiences and promoting flexibility in teaching methods.

References

Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39-56. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1104867.pdf

Bernacchio, C., & Mullen, M. (2007). Universal design for learning. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.2975/31.2.2007.167.169

Dewi, S. S., & Dalimunthe, H. A. (2019). The effectiveness of universal design for learning. Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(1), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v6i1.14042

García-Campos, M. D., Canabal, C., & Alba-Pastor, C. (2020). Executive functions in universal design for learning: Moving towards inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 660-674. DOI:10.1080/13603116.2018.1474955

Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, First Edition (pp. 253-259). IGI Global. DOI:10.4018/978-1-59140-553-5.ch047

Guo, S., Chai, Q., & Wang, M. (2022). Evaluation model of online and offline mixed teaching quality in colleges and universities based on BP neural network. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 7560227. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7560227

Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (Eds.). (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications. Guilford pressPress.

Hilot, C. A. M. F., Paderog, J.-K. B., Gaduyon, A. F. E., Jumao-As, J. P., Lagrada, L. M. V., Lamoste, C. M. A., & Batiancila, M. J. Q. (2025). Academic Satisfaction: A Comparative Analysis Between Blended Schedule and Everyday Classroom Instruction Among College Students. American Journal of Human Psychology, 3(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v3i1.4097

Marx, K. and F. Engels, F. . (1994), Collected Works, Volume 20. National Political Publishing House, Hanoi..

Lawsin, N. L. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2023). Improving STS Teaching Practice Through Transversal Competencies Towards Seamless Blended Digital Learning . American Journal of Education and Technology, 2(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i1.1122

Namyssova, G., Tussupbekova, G., Helmer, J., Malone, K., Afzal, M., & Jonbekova, D. (2019). Challenges and benefits of blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Technology in Education, 2(1), 22-31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264247.pdf

Nguyen, T. T. (2016). Magic and literature: The case of modern Latin American fantasy novels. Journal of Science, 5(83), 91. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.0.5(83).402(2016)

Nguyen, T. T. (2019). Measures to enhance the quality of teaching Latin American literature at the Faculty of Literature, University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City: Summary report of the university-level Science and Technology research project (scientific researchDoctoral dissertation, University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City). https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.18.2.2987(2021)

Nguyen, T. T. (2022). Detailed syllabus of Latin American Literature course (Internal document). Ho Chi Minh City University of Education.

Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Detailed syllabus of Latin American Literature course (Internal document). Ho Chi Minh City University of Education.

Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Online pedagogical scenario of Latin American Literature course (Internal document). Ho Chi Minh City University of Education.

Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A Curriculum Every Student Can Use: Design Principles for Student Access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief. ERIC/OSEP Special Project.

Rix, R. W. (2011). Blended learning: Perspectives on mixing online and offline communities of enquiry. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(4), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2011.8.4.423

Rose, D. (2001). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 64-67. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/94000/.

Sharma, D., Sood, A. K., Darius, P. S., Gundabattini, E., Darius Gnanaraj, S., & Joseph Jeyapaul, A. (2022). A study on the online-offline and blended learning methods. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B, 103(4), 1373-1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-022-00766-y

Singh, P., Sinha, R., Koay, W. L., Teoh, K. B., Nayak, P., Lim, C. H., ... & Aryani, D. N. (2021). A comparative study on effectiveness of online and offline learning in higher education. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pasific, 4(3), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijthap.v4i3.1212

Spooner, F., Baker, J. N., Harris, A. A., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Browder, D. M. (2007). Effects of training in universal design for learning on lesson plan development. Remedial and special education, 28(2), 108-116.

Wang, M. J. (2010). Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6).

Downloads

Published

2025-04-26

How to Cite

Phan, D. K., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, T. T., & Ngoan, V. K. (2025). Applying UDL to Blended Learning: A Case Study of The Latin American Literature Course. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 3(2), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v3i2.4617

Similar Articles

11-20 of 72

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.